The Limits of Flexibility: Comments on the Post-Fordist Vision of Production and Its Geography

Recently some economic geographers have drawn our attention to what are alleged to be fundamental changes in production, based on the adoption of more flexible machines and labour within firms, and more flexible relations between firms. Certain spatial implications such as reagglomeration of production are said to have resulted from these changes, or are believed to be underway. This paper critically examines these contentions by setting out the fundamental elements of these changes, considering the degree of their pervasiveness throughout western economies, and the extent to which such changes really do represent a distinct break with the past history and geography of production. In doing so, this paper seeks to uncover the true motivations underlying technological change in the workplace, exposing some common misconceptions about the new flexible production methods and their impacts.

[1]  J. Rees.  TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE AND REGIONAL SHIFTS IN AMERICAN MANUFACTURING , 1979 .

[2]  Charles F. Sabel,et al.  Work and Politics , 1982 .

[3]  Fergus Murray,et al.  The decentralisation of production — the decline of the mass-collective worker? , 1983 .

[4]  John R. Harris,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[5]  David F. Noble.  Forces of production : a social history of industrial automation , 1984 .

[6]  C. R. Estall,et al.  Stock control in manufacturing: The just-in-time system and its locational implications. , 1985 .

[7]  Across the Industrial Divide: A Review Article , 1985 .

[8]  Ann Markusen,et al.  Profit cycles, oligopoly, and regional development , 1985 .

[9]  Productive Decentralisation in Three European Regions , 1985 .

[10]  Harley Shaiken,et al.  Work Transformed: Automation and Labor in the Computer Age , 1985 .

[11]  W. Diebold,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide , 1985 .

[12]  Allen J. Scott,et al.  Industrial Organization and Location: Division of Labor, the Firm, and Spatial Process , 1986 .

[13]  M. Hepworth,et al.  The geography of technological change in the information economy , 1986 .

[14]  R. Jaikumar.  Postindustrial manufacturing , 1986 .

[15]  C. Debresson,et al.  Forces of production : a social history of industrial automation , 1985 .

[16]  H. Shaiken,et al.  The Work Process Under More Flexible Production , 1986 .

[17]  E. Schoenberger.  Technological and Organizational Change in Automobile Production: Spatial Implications 1 , 1987 .

[18]  Karl-H. Ebel.  The impact of industrial robots on the world of work , 1987, Robotics.

[19]  The Impact of Technological Change upon the Spatial Pattern of UK Employment within Major Corporations , 1987 .

[20]  M. Gertler.  PROGRESS REPORT: CAPITAL, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY DYNAMICS IN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT , 1987 .

[21]  M. Storper,et al.  Flexible Specialization and Regional Industrial Agglomerations: The Case of the U.S. Motion Picture Industry , 1987 .

[22]  I. Welber,et al.  Factory of the future , 1987, IEEE Control Systems Magazine.

[23]  Erica Schoenberger,et al.  From Fordism to Flexible Accumulation: Technology, Competitive Strategies, and International Location , 1988 .

[24]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Flexible Integration, Scope Economies, and Strategic Alliances: Social and Spatial Mediations , 1988 .

[25]  M. Gertler.  Some Problems of Time in Economic Geography , 1988 .