A Monolithic Approach to Fluid–Composite Structure Interaction

We study a nonlinear fluid–structure interaction (FSI) problem between an incompressible, viscous fluid and a composite elastic structure consisting of two layers: a thin layer (membrane) in direct contact with the fluid, and a thick layer (3D linearly elastic structure) sitting on top of the thin layer. The coupling between the fluid and structure, and the coupling between the two structures is achieved via the kinematic and dynamic coupling conditions modeling no-slip and balance of forces, respectively. The coupling is evaluated at the moving fluid–structure interface with mass, i.e., the thin structure. To solve this nonlinear moving-boundary problem in 3D, a monolithic, fully implicit method was developed, and combined with an arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian approach to deal with the motion of the fluid domain. This class of problems and its generalizations are important in e.g., modeling FSI between blood flow and arterial walls, which are known to be composed of several different layers, each with different mechanical characteristics and thickness. By using this model we show how multi-layered structure of arterial walls influences the pressure wave propagation in arterial walls, and how the presence of atheroma and the presence of a vascular device called stent, influence intramural strain distribution throughout different layers of the arterial wall. The detailed intramural strain distribution provided by this model can be used in conjunction with ultrasound B-mode scans as a predictive tool for an early detection of atherosclerosis (Zahnd et al. in IEEE international on ultrasonics symposium (IUS), pp 1770–1773, 2011).

[1]  Charles S. Peskin,et al.  Simulations of the Whirling Instability by the Immersed Boundary Method , 2004, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[2]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  A Computational Framework for Fluid-Solid-Growth Modeling in Cardiovascular Simulations. , 2009, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering.

[3]  D. Perić,et al.  A Fully Implicit Computational Strategy for Strongly Coupled Fluid–Solid Interaction , 2007 .

[4]  Boris Muha,et al.  A note on optimal regularity and regularizing effects of point mass coupling for a heat-wave system , 2014, 1403.3965.

[5]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  On the Volume Conservation of the Immersed Boundary Method , 2012 .

[6]  M Cerrolaza,et al.  Analysis of 3D transient blood flow passing through an artificial aortic valve by Lattice-Boltzmann methods. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  M. Heil An efficient solver for the fully-coupled solution of large-displacement fluid-structure interaction problems , 2004 .

[8]  Z. Feng,et al.  The immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method for solving fluid-particles interaction problems , 2004 .

[9]  Nico Westerhof,et al.  The diastolic flow-pressure gradient relation in coronary stenoses in humans. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Alfio Quarteroni,et al.  Comparisons between reduced order models and full 3D models for fluid-structure interaction problems in haemodynamics , 2014, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[11]  S. Čanić,et al.  Mathematical analysis of the quasilinear effects in a hyperbolic model blood flow through compliant axi‐symmetric vessels , 2003 .

[12]  James E. Moore,et al.  Stented artery biomechanics and device design optimization , 2007, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[13]  C. Peskin,et al.  A computational fluid dynamics of `clap and fling' in the smallest insects , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[14]  Joel L. Berry,et al.  Experimental and Computational Flow Evaluation of Coronary Stents , 2000, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  W. Wall,et al.  Truly monolithic algebraic multigrid for fluid–structure interaction , 2011 .

[16]  P. Tallec,et al.  Fluid structure interaction with large structural displacements , 2001 .

[17]  Fabio Nobile,et al.  Numerical approximation of fluid-structure interaction problems with application to haemodynamics , 2001 .

[18]  Alfio Quarteroni,et al.  FaCSI: A block parallel preconditioner for fluid-structure interaction in hemodynamics , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[19]  Fernando Alfonso,et al.  Current treatment of in-stent restenosis. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Ricardo H. Nochetto,et al.  Dynamics of Biomembranes: Effect of the Bulk Fluid , 2011 .

[21]  Xiao-Chuan Cai,et al.  A fully implicit domain decomposition based ALE framework for three-dimensional fluid-structure interaction with application in blood flow computation , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[22]  F. Auricchio,et al.  Mechanical behavior of coronary stents investigated through the finite element method. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  C Dumoulin,et al.  Mechanical behaviour modelling of balloon-expandable stents. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  A. Quarteroni,et al.  A SEMI-IMPLICIT APPROACH FOR FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION BASED ON AN ALGEBRAIC FRACTIONAL STEP METHOD , 2007 .

[25]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Simulating the fluid dynamics of natural and prosthetic heart valves using the immersed boundary method , 2009 .

[26]  Fabio Nobile,et al.  Added-mass effect in the design of partitioned algorithms for fluid-structure problems , 2005 .

[27]  Alfio Quarteroni,et al.  Computational vascular fluid dynamics: problems, models and methods , 2000 .

[28]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  A coupled momentum method for modeling blood flow in three-dimensional deformable arteries , 2006 .

[29]  A. Leuprecht,et al.  Numerical study of hemodynamics and wall mechanics in distal end-to-side anastomoses of bypass grafts. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  Mate Kosor,et al.  Mechanical behavior of fully expanded commercially available endovascular coronary stents. , 2011, Texas Heart Institute journal.

[31]  F. Baaijens A fictitious domain/mortar element method for fluid-structure interaction , 2001 .

[32]  Zhifang Lin,et al.  Lattice Boltzmann method for simulating the viscous flow in large distensible blood vessels. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  Xiao-Chuan Cai,et al.  Scalable parallel methods for monolithic coupling in fluid-structure interaction with application to blood flow modeling , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[34]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  An adaptive, formally second order accurate version of the immersed boundary method , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[35]  L. Fauci,et al.  Biofluidmechanics of Reproduction , 2006 .

[36]  Annalisa Quaini,et al.  Modular vs. non-modular preconditioners for fluid-structure systems with large added-mass effect , 2008 .

[37]  Alfio Quarteroni,et al.  Numerical modeling of fluid–structure interaction in arteries with anisotropic polyconvex hyperelastic and anisotropic viscoelastic material models at finite strains , 2016, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[38]  J. Gunn,et al.  The influence of physical stent parameters upon restenosis. , 2004, Pathologie-biologie.

[39]  C. Peskin Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart , 1977 .

[40]  C. Peskin The immersed boundary method , 2002, Acta Numerica.

[41]  oris,et al.  Existence of a weak solution to a nonlinear fluid-structure interaction problem modeling the flow of an incompressible , viscous fluid in a cylinder with deformable walls , 2012 .

[42]  D. Vray,et al.  Intramural shear strain can highlight the presence of atherosclerosis: A clinical in vivo study , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[43]  Joel L. Berry,et al.  Fluid and Solid Mechanical Implications of Vascular Stenting , 2002, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows☆ , 1981 .

[45]  G. Cottet,et al.  EULERIAN FORMULATION AND LEVEL SET MODELS FOR INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION , 2008 .

[46]  A. Huerta,et al.  Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian Methods , 2004 .

[47]  Ernst Rank,et al.  Two-dimensional simulation of fluid–structure interaction using lattice-Boltzmann methods , 2001 .

[48]  Neal L. Eigler,et al.  PHARMACO-MECHANICAL APPROACH TO CAD Stent Design : Implications for Restenosis , 2002 .

[49]  Patrick Patrick Anderson,et al.  A combined fictitious domain/adaptive meshing method for fluid–structure interaction in heart valves , 2004 .

[50]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Immersed boundary model of aortic heart valve dynamics with physiological driving and loading conditions , 2012, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[51]  Suncica Canic,et al.  A partitioned scheme for fluid-composite structure interaction problems , 2015, J. Comput. Phys..

[52]  Aaron L Fogelson,et al.  Platelet-wall interactions in continuum models of platelet thrombosis: formulation and numerical solution. , 2004, Mathematical medicine and biology : a journal of the IMA.

[53]  Paolo Crosetto,et al.  Parallel Algorithms for Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems in Haemodynamics , 2011, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[54]  U. Sigwart,et al.  A stent is not just a stent: Stent construction and design do matter in its clinical performance. , 2004, Singapore medical journal.

[55]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations , 2008 .

[56]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Solution techniques for the fully discretized equations in computation of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time formulations , 2006 .

[57]  Preprint Seria,et al.  Existence of a solution to a fluid-multi-layered-structure interaction problem , 2013 .

[58]  Andreas O Frank,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics and stent design. , 2002, Artificial organs.

[59]  Fabio Nobile,et al.  Fluid-structure partitioned procedures based on Robin transmission conditions , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..