Viscoelastic characterization of in vitro canine tissue.

Mechanical properties of biological tissues are of interest for assessing the performance of elastographic methods that evaluate the stiffness characteristics of tissue. The mechanical properties of interest include the frequency-dependent complex moduli, storage and loss moduli of tissues. Determination of the mechanical properties of biological tissues is often limited by proper geometry of the sample, as well as homogeneity of the stress-strain relationship. Measurements were performed on in vitro canine liver tissue specimens, over a frequency range from 0.1 to 400 Hz. Tests were conducted using an EnduraTEC ELF 3200, a dynamic testing system for determining the mechanical properties of materials. Both normal tissues and thermal lesions prepared by radio frequency ablation were tested. Experiments were conducted by uniaxially compressing tissue samples using Plexiglas platens larger than the specimens and measuring the load response. The resulting moduli spectra were then fit to a modified Kelvin-Voigt model, called the Kelvin-Voigt fractional derivative model. The data agree well with the model and in comparing the results from the normal tissue with that of the thermal lesions, the concept of a complex modulus contrast is introduced and its applications to elastography are discussed.

[1]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Elastic Moduli of Breast and Prostate Tissues under Compression , 1998, Ultrasonic imaging.

[2]  B Suki,et al.  Effects of collagenase and elastase on the mechanical properties of lung tissue strips. , 2000, Journal of applied physiology.

[3]  L. Wilson,et al.  Ultrasonic Measurement of Small Displacements and Deformations of Tissue , 1982 .

[4]  T. Szabo,et al.  A model for longitudinal and shear wave propagation in viscoelastic media , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Michael Burcher,et al.  A novel ultrasound indentation system for measuring biomechanical properties of in vivo soft tissue. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  Michele J. Grimm,et al.  ESTIMATING THE MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF BRAIN TISSUE AT IMPACT FREQUENCIES : A CURVE-FITTING SOLUTION , .

[7]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Phantom materials for elastography , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  J Ophir,et al.  Fundamental limitations on the contrast-transfer efficiency in elastography: an analytic study. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  L. S. Taylor,et al.  Preliminary Results of Cyclic Uniaxial Compression of Bovine Liver , 2003 .

[10]  L. Wilson,et al.  Ultrasonic measurement of small displacements and deformations of tissue. , 1982, Ultrasonic imaging.

[11]  R Vanderby,et al.  Interrelation of creep and relaxation: a modeling approach for ligaments. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  Wen-Chun Yeh,et al.  Elastic modulus measurements of human liver and correlation with pathology. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  Kevin J. Parker,et al.  A Kelvin-Voight Fractional Derivative Model for Viscoelastic Characterization of Liver Tissue , 2002 .

[14]  L. Bilston,et al.  On the viscoelastic character of liver tissue: experiments and modelling of the linear behaviour. , 2000, Biorheology.

[15]  J. Ophir,et al.  Elastography: A Quantitative Method for Imaging the Elasticity of Biological Tissues , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[16]  R. Bagley,et al.  A Theoretical Basis for the Application of Fractional Calculus to Viscoelasticity , 1983 .

[17]  S J Kirkpatrick,et al.  Mechanical properties of coagulated albumin and failure mechanisms of liver repaired with the use of an argon-beam coagulator with albumin. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  Abbas Samani,et al.  Measuring the elastic modulus of ex vivo small tissue samples. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Sung Min Kim,et al.  Comparison of Viscoelastic Properties of the Pharyngeal Tissue: Human and Canine , 1999, Dysphagia.

[20]  K B Arbogast,et al.  Material characterization of the brainstem from oscillatory shear tests. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  W. O’Brien,et al.  Young's modulus measurements of soft tissues with application to elasticity imaging , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[22]  Viscoelastic Effects in Sonoelastography: Impact on Tumor Detectability , 2001 .

[23]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lung tissue viscoelasticity: a mathematical framework and its molecular basis. , 1994, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  J. Crandall,et al.  Nonlinear viscoelastic effects in oscillatory shear deformation of brain tissue. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[25]  Lynne E. Bilston,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of pig kidney in shear, experimental results and modelling , 2002 .

[26]  M. Ishihara,et al.  Viscoelastic Characterization of Biological Tissue by Photoacoustic Measurement , 2003 .

[27]  A.R. Skovoroda,et al.  Measuring the Elastic Modulus of Small Tissue Samples , 1998, Ultrasonic imaging.

[28]  C. R. Hill,et al.  Measurement of soft tissue motion using correlation between A-scans. , 1982, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[29]  Denis Laurendeau,et al.  Non-linear Soft Tissue Deformations for the Simulation of Percutaneous Surgeries , 2001, MICCAI.

[30]  DYNAMIC MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF AGAROSE GEL BY A FRACTIONAL DERIVATIVE MODEL , 2002 .

[31]  Kai-Nan An,et al.  Dynamic mechanical properties of agarose gels modeled by a fractional derivative model. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.