Phase and velocity distributions in vertically upward high-viscosity two-phase flow

Abstract The two-phase pressure drop in vertical industrial pipes is mainly determined by gravitation and acceleration of the fluid, which means that the void fraction is key an important parameter in any model to predict pressure drops. Typically, these models are applied in industry to size pumps and, e.g., emergency relief systems. There is a shortage of void fraction data in the literature for liquids with a dynamic viscosity above 1000 mPa s. Adiabatic experiments have been performed of mixtures of nitrogen and solutions of polyvinylpyrrolidone (Luviskol ® ) in water with dynamic viscosities in the range 900–7000 mPa s. Inner tube diameter was 54.5 mm. Mass flux and quality were varied in a wide range: 8–3500 kg/m 2 /s and 0–82%, respectively. The corresponding superficial velocities were 0.005–3.4 m/s for the liquid and 0–30 m/s for the nitrogen. For comparison, reference measurements were taken of mixtures of nitrogen with water (1 mPa s). Care has been taken to measure only well-developed flows. Time-averaged local void fraction profiles have been determined with a linearly traversed γ-ray densitometer. Analysis shows that at high superficial gas velocity (gas Reynolds numbers in the range 0–1.2 × 10 5 have been studied, liquid Reynolds numbers in the range 0.2–1.7 × 10 5 ) the total superficial velocity profile is peaking in the centre of the tube. With increasing superficial gas velocity the peaking gets stronger. It is shown that time- and space-averaged void fractions are not well predicted with existing correlations. Two new correlations are presented, one of them in terms of the distribution parameter. The other, in terms of the velocity slip, unifies the results of low- and high-viscosity mixtures.

[1]  Michael R. Davis,et al.  Structural development of gas-liquid mixture flows , 1976, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  R. Lockhart Proposed Correlation of Data for Isothermal Two-Phase, Two-Component Flow in Pipes , 1949 .

[3]  N. Zuber,et al.  Average volumetric concentration in two-phase flow systems , 1965 .

[4]  D. McNeil,et al.  The effects of a highly viscous liquid phase on vertically upward two-phase flow in a pipe , 2003 .

[5]  A. P. Burdukov,et al.  Local characteristics of upward gas-liquid flows , 1981 .

[6]  A. E. Dukler,et al.  Modelling flow pattern transitions for steady upward gas‐liquid flow in vertical tubes , 1980 .

[7]  G. S. Woods,et al.  Vertical Two-Phase Flow: Part III: Pressure Drop , 1998 .

[8]  Ivo Kljenak,et al.  Space-time evolution of the nonhomogeneous bubble distribution in upward flow , 1993 .

[9]  T. Furukawa,et al.  Prediction of the effects of liquid viscosity on interfacial shear stress and frictional pressure drop in vertical upward gas–liquid annular flow , 1998 .

[10]  C. S. Kabir,et al.  Performance of a two-phase gas/liquid flow model in vertical wells , 1990 .

[11]  Franz Mayinger,et al.  Strömung und Wärmeübergang in Gas-Flüssigkeits-Gemischen , 1982 .

[12]  Lutz Friedel,et al.  Reproductive accuracy of selected void fraction correlations for horizontal and vertical upflow , 1998 .

[13]  D. Chisholm Two-Phase Flow in Pipelines and Heat Exchangers , 1983 .

[14]  Timothy J. O'Hern,et al.  Gamma-densitometry tomography of gas holdup spatial distribution in industrial-scale bubble columns , 1995 .

[15]  Isao Kataoka,et al.  Turbulence structure of air-water bubbly flow—II. local properties , 1975 .

[16]  D. L. George,et al.  Three-phase material distribution measurements in a vertical flow using gamma-densitometry tomography and electrical-impedance tomography , 2001 .

[17]  D. Beattie,et al.  Steam-water void fraction for vertical upflow in a 73.9 mm pipe , 1986 .

[18]  E J Farrell Tomographic imaging of attenuation with simulation correction for refraction. , 1981, Ultrasonic imaging.