Turbulent Fluctuation Velocity: The Most Significant Determinant of Signal Loss in Stenotic Vessels

Studies of flow in a 90%‐stenosis phantom were conducted to elucidate the parameters and mechanisms responsible for signal loss in MR angiographic images. The studies independently evaluated the effect of velocity, Reynolds number, turbulent fluctuation velocity, and turbulence intensity on the amount of post‐stenotic signal loss. Results suggested that the magnitude of the turbulent fluctuation velocity, not merely the presence of turbulence or the intensity of turbulence, was the parameter that determined the extent of the signal loss. The study suggests that future flow phantom studies should be conducted with fluids having physiologic velocities and viscosities to obtain accurate levels of turbulent fluctuation velocities and hence reproduce results of in‐vivo signal‐loss patterns. The mechanism for signal loss is that the temporal and spatial variations of the turbulent fluctuation velocity cause a range of phases to be present within a voxel. Examination of the theoretical aspects of fluid turbulence suggest that shortening gradient durations and imaging during diastole may help reduce signal loss.

[1]  T J Masaryk,et al.  3DFT MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation: potential and limitations as a screening examination. , 1991, Radiology.

[2]  D N Firmin,et al.  The application of phase shifts in NMR for flow measurement , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Orhan Nalcioglu,et al.  Measurement of eddy diffusivity by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging , 1990, Medical Imaging.

[4]  C L Dumoulin,et al.  MR angiography of lower‐extremity arterial disease: Preliminary experience , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  P Boesiger,et al.  FID-acquired-echos (FAcE): a short echo time imaging method for flow artefact suppression. , 1991, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[6]  Orhan Nalcioglu,et al.  Incoherent Flow Imaging , 1986, Other Conferences.

[7]  O Henriksen,et al.  Quantification of complex flow using MR phase imaging--a study of parameters influencing the phase/velocity relation. , 1992, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  R Mezrich,et al.  The comparative evaluation of three-dimensional magnetic resonance for carotid artery disease. , 1991, Journal of vascular surgery.

[9]  Y Nose,et al.  Magnetic resonance signal intensity patterns obtained from continuous and pulsatile flow models. , 1984, Radiology.

[10]  Kuethe Measuring distributions of diffusivity in turbulent fluids with magnetic-resonance imaging. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[11]  J. H. Gao,et al.  Turbulent flow effects on NMR imaging: measurement of turbulent intensity. , 1991, Medical physics.

[12]  E. K. Yucel,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Angiography , 1999 .

[13]  P. J. Keller,et al.  MR angiography with two-dimensional acquisition and three-dimensional display. Work in progress. , 1989, Radiology.

[14]  K.,et al.  Blood flow imaging with MR: spin-phase phenomena. , 1985, Radiology.

[15]  D B Plewes,et al.  Mechanisms of flow‐induced signal loss in MR angiography , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  G Friedmann,et al.  MR imaging of poststenotic flow phenomena: Experimental studies , 1991, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

[17]  D. Giddens,et al.  Analysis of disorder in pulsatile flows with application to poststenotic blood velocity measurement in dogs. , 1978, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  R. Edelman,et al.  Evaluation of the extracranial carotid arteries: correlation of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasonography, and conventional angiography. , 1991, Journal of vascular surgery.

[19]  M Heller,et al.  Appearance of poststenotic jets in MRI: dependence on flow velocity and on imaging parameters. , 1991, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[20]  J. Lumley,et al.  A First Course in Turbulence , 1972 .

[21]  J. Gore,et al.  Mapping of turbulent intensity by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1994, Journal of Magnetic Resonance - Series B.

[22]  C L Dumoulin,et al.  Three‐dimensional phase contrast angiography , 1989, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  W. Bradley,et al.  Blood flow: magnetic resonance imaging. , 1985, Radiology.

[24]  J L Duerk,et al.  Analysis of imaging axes significance in motion artifact suppression technique (MAST): MRI of turbulent flow and motion. , 1989, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[25]  L. Hedlund,et al.  Evaluation of flow through simulated vascular stenoses with gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging. , 1989, Investigative radiology.