Distribution of peak shear stress in finite element models of reinforced concrete slabs

Abstract Existing reinforced concrete solid slab bridges in the Netherlands are re-assessed for shear based on a Unity Check: the ratio of the shear stress caused by the applied loads to the shear capacity of the concrete cross-section. The governing shear stress resulting from the self-weight, weight of the wearing surface, distributed and concentrated live loads, can be determined with a simplified spreadsheet-based method, the Quick Scan (Level of Assessment I) as well as with a linear finite element model (Level of Assessment II). When a finite element model is used, a distribution of shear stresses over the width of the slab bridge is automatically found. To compare the governing shear stress caused by the loads to the shear capacity, it is necessary to determine over which width the peak shear stress from the finite element model can be distributed. To answer this question, a finite element model is compared to an experiment. The experiment consists of a continuous, reinforced concrete slab subjected to a single concentrated load close to the support. Seven bearings equipped with load cells that measure the reaction force profile along the width of the slab are used to compare to the stress profile obtained from the finite element model. From this analysis, it is found that the peak shear stress in a linear finite element model can be distributed over 4 d l with d l the effective depth to the longitudinal reinforcement of the slab. The comparison of measured reaction force profiles over the support to the stress profile from a finite element model results in a research-based distribution width that replaces the rules of thumb that were used until now.

[1]  Ane de Boer,et al.  Recommendations for the Shear Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Slab Bridges from Experiments , 2013 .

[2]  R.D.J.M. Steenbergen,et al.  Determining the in situ concrete strength of existing structures for assessing their structural safety , 2012 .

[3]  Joost C. Walraven,et al.  Shear in One-Way Slabs under Concentrated Load Close to Support , 2013 .

[4]  Beatrice Belletti,et al.  Analytical and numerical evaluation of the design shear resistance of reinforced concrete slabs , 2014 .

[5]  Joost C. Walraven,et al.  One-Way Slabs Subjected to Combination of Loads Failing in Shear , 2012 .

[6]  Joost C. Walraven,et al.  Database of wide concrete members failing in shear , 2015 .

[7]  Eva O. L. Lantsoght,et al.  Material properties: Felt and reinforcement: for shear test of reinforced concrete slab , 2011 .

[8]  Cor van der Veen,et al.  Proof load testing of reinforced concrete slab bridges in the Netherlands , 2017 .

[9]  Ane de Boer,et al.  Quick Scan on Shear in Existing Slab Type Viaducts , 2013 .

[10]  Joost C. Walraven,et al.  Transition from one-way to two-way shear in slabs under concentrated loads , 2015 .

[11]  Tamon Ueda,et al.  EFFECTIVE WIDTH FOR SHEAR FAILURE OF RC DEEP SLABS , 1999 .

[12]  P. G. Bergan,et al.  Nonlinear finite element analysis of concrete structures , 1979 .

[13]  Joost C. Walraven,et al.  Recommendations for the shear assessment of reinforced concrete solid slab bridges , 2014 .

[14]  Eva O. L. Lantsoght,et al.  Levels of approximation for the shear assessment of reinforced concrete slab bridges , 2017 .

[15]  C. Veen,et al.  Plastic Model for Asymmetrically Loaded Reinforced Concrete Slabs , 2017, "SP-321: Recent Developments in Two-Way Slabs: Design, Analysis, Construction, and Evaluation".

[16]  Joost C. Walraven,et al.  Influence of Width on Shear Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Members , 2014 .