Effect of inoculum type and timing of application of Coniothyrium minitans on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum: control of sclerotinia disease in glasshouse lettuce

The effects of Coniothyrium minitans inoculum quality and an 8-week interval between inoculum application and crop planting on sclerotinia (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) disease in three successive lettuce crops were investigated in a glasshouse trial. Spore suspensions of three isolates of C. minitans (Conio, IVT1 and Contans) applied at 108 CFU m−2 and a standard Conio maizemeal–perlite application (06 L m−2, 1011 CFU m−2) were assessed for their ability to control S. sclerotiorum. Only the maizemeal–perlite inoculum (isolate Conio) consistently reduced sclerotinia disease. In the third lettuce crop only, isolates IVT1 and Contans formulated by Prophyta and isolate IVT as an oil–water formulation, all applied as spore suspensions, reduced disease at harvest compared with the untreated control. Recovery, viability and C. minitans infection of sclerotia buried during the 8-week period prior to each of the three lettuce crops, and of sclerotia formed on the crop, were tested. Only the maizemeal–perlite inoculum (isolate Conio) reduced the recovery of sclerotia buried in soil for weeks between inoculum application and crop planting, reducing their viability and increasing infection by C. minitans. Eight weeks was sufficient to enable C. minitans to infect sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum, and may account for disease control. After harvest of the second and third crops, maizemeal–perlite treatment (isolate Conio) reduced the number and viability of sclerotia recovered on the soil surface and increased infection by C. minitans compared with spore-suspension treatments. The effect of inoculum concentration and the influence of soil temperature (varying with time of year) on infection of sclerotia by C. minitans are discussed.

[1]  J. Whipps,et al.  Production, survival and evaluation of solid-substrate inocula ofConiothyrium minitans againstSclerotinia sclerotiorum , 2005, European Journal of Plant Pathology.

[2]  A. Mead,et al.  Effect of inoculum type and timing of application of Coniothyrium minitans on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum: influence on apothecial production , 2004 .

[3]  J. Whipps,et al.  Effect of Inoculum Rates and Sources of Coniothyrium minitans on Control of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Disease in Glasshouse Lettuce , 2002, European Journal of Plant Pathology.

[4]  J. Whipps,et al.  A Glasshouse Cropping Method for Screening Lettuce Lines for Resistance to Sclerotinia Sclerotiorum , 2002, European Journal of Plant Pathology.

[5]  A. Mead,et al.  Evaluation of different Coniothyrium minitans inoculum sources and application rates on apothecial production and infection of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum sclerotia , 2003 .

[6]  J. Whipps,et al.  Use of Coniothyrium minitans transformed with the hygromycin B resistance gene to study survival and infection of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum sclerotia in soil. , 2003, Mycological research.

[7]  S. Welham,et al.  REML analysis of mixed models , 2002 .

[8]  J. Whipps,et al.  Potential for Integrated Control of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Glasshouse Lettuce Using Coniothyrium minitans and Reduced Fungicide Application. , 2001, Phytopathology.

[9]  E. Bremer,et al.  Foliar application of fungal biocontrol agents for the control of white mold of dry bean caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. , 2000 .

[10]  A. Stewart,et al.  Selection of mycoparasites of sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum isolated from New Zealand soils , 2000 .

[11]  P. Vereijken,et al.  Long-Term Biosanitation by Application of Coniothyrium minitans on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum-Infected Crops. , 1999, Phytopathology.

[12]  R. Cooke,et al.  Role of soil mesofauna in dispersal of Coniothyrium minitans: transmission to sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum , 1998 .

[13]  R. Cooke,et al.  Role of soil mesofauna in dispersal of Coniothyrium minitans : Mechanisms of transmission , 1998 .

[14]  R. Cooke,et al.  Splash dispersal of Coniothyrium minitans in the glasshouse , 1998 .

[15]  J. Lewis,et al.  Formulation Of Microorganisms To Control Plant Diseases , 1998 .

[16]  J. Ristaino,et al.  Agriculture, Methyl Bromide, and the Ozone Hole: Can We Fill the Gaps? , 1997, Plant disease.

[17]  J. Whipps,et al.  Production, survival and evaluation of liquid culture-produced inocula of Coniothyrium minitans against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum , 1997 .

[18]  J. Whipps,et al.  Use of Coniothyrium minitans and Gliocladium virens for Biological Control of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Glasshouse Lettuce , 1995 .

[19]  J. Whipps,et al.  Effect of Coniothyrium minitans on sclerotial survival and apothecial production of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in field‐grown oilseed rape , 1995 .

[20]  J. Whipps,et al.  Glasshouse trials of Coniothyrium minitans and Trichoderma species for the biological control of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in celery and lettuce. , 1991 .

[21]  J. Whipps,et al.  Screening for sclerotial mycoparasites of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. , 1990 .

[22]  B. Wheeler,et al.  A method for inducing apothecia from sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum , 1987 .

[23]  M. Challen,et al.  Polypropylene straw ampoules for the storage of microorganisms in liquid nitrogen , 1986 .

[24]  J. Lynch,et al.  The use of micro-organisms to control plant disease , 1986 .

[25]  H. C. Huang,et al.  Pathogenicity and survival of the tan-sclerotial strain of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum , 1983 .

[26]  P. Merriman,et al.  Reduction of sclerotial inoculum of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum with Coniothyrium minitans. , 1980 .

[27]  G. Turner,et al.  On Coniothyrium minitans and its parasitism of Sclerotinia species. , 1976 .

[28]  P. Merriman Survival of sclerotia of sclerotinia sclerotiorum in soil , 1976 .

[29]  H. Tribe On the parasitism of Sclerotinia trifoliorum by Coniothyrium minitans , 1957 .