Many-to-many exchange without money: why people share their resources

This paper extends our knowledge of the growing movement of collaborative consumption, or people sharing with others, in a collective shift away from the outright purchase of things. The focus of the study is on the sharing of land, one of our most widely held and debt-laden assets, for food production, a fundamental human need that has not been the topic of other collaborative consumption research. The research presents a netnographic study of the motivations to participate in Landshare, a non-profit scheme operating in the UK, Canada, and Australia, which “connects growers to people with land to share.” The study finds there are significant social belonging and other benefits stemming from collaborative consumption and, in the case of Landshare, a new finding not previously reported in consumer behaviour research, of physical and mental health benefits. This expands the study of exchange as a consumer-to-consumer phenomenon, where no money changes hands.

[1]  Jay M. Handelman,et al.  Don’t read this; or, who cares what the hell anti‐consumption is, anyways? , 2010 .

[2]  Paul W. Ballantine,et al.  Sharing as a form of anti‐consumption? An examination of toy library users , 2010 .

[3]  Cait Lamberton,et al.  When is Ours Better than Mine? A Framework for Understanding and Altering Participation in Commercial Sharing Systems , 2012 .

[4]  Holger Rohn,et al.  Collaborative consumption : towards a resource-saving consumption culture , 2013 .

[5]  Christopher R. Plouffe Examining “peer‐to‐peer” (P2P) systems as consumer‐to‐consumer (C2C) exchange , 2008 .

[6]  Jennifer Reynolds,et al.  Growing urban health: community gardening in South-East Toronto. , 2007, Health promotion international.

[7]  N. Forster,et al.  The Analysis of Company Documentation , 2006 .

[8]  Rainer Alt,et al.  Sharing Economy , 2016, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[9]  M. Newcombe,et al.  Paradox, performance and food: managing difference in the construction of femininity , 2014 .

[10]  C. Williams,et al.  Why do households use alternative consumption practices? , 2005 .

[11]  J. Potts,et al.  Towards a general theory of thrift , 2014 .

[12]  Oded Nov,et al.  Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community: A multidimensional perspective , 2010 .

[13]  Isabelle Szmigin,et al.  Living production‐engaged alternatives: An examination of new consumption communities , 2010 .

[14]  Giana M. Eckhardt,et al.  Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing , 2012 .

[15]  A. Muñiz,et al.  How Brand Community Practices Create Value , 2009 .

[16]  Rachel Botsman,et al.  What's Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption , 2010 .

[17]  N Yannopoulou,et al.  User-Generated Brands and Social Media: Couchsurfing and Airbnb , 2013 .

[18]  Kelly D. Martin,et al.  Broadening the Paradigm of Marketing as Exchange: A Public Policy and Marketing Perspective , 2014 .

[19]  Michael G. Luchs,et al.  Toward a Sustainable Marketplace: Expanding Options and Benefits for Consumers , 2011 .

[20]  Devan Rosen,et al.  CouchSurfing: Belonging and trust in a globally cooperative online social network , 2011, New Media Soc..

[21]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Open Collaboration for Innovation: Principles and Performance , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[22]  R. Kozinets The Field behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities , 2002 .

[23]  R. Belk Sharing: Table 1 , 2010 .

[24]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[25]  Oded Nov,et al.  Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives: The roles of contribution context and personal values , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Helene Cherrier,et al.  Anti-consumption discourses and consumer-resistant identities , 2009 .

[27]  Pia A. Albinsson,et al.  Alternative marketplaces in the 21st century: Building community through sharing events , 2012 .

[28]  Michael G. Luchs,et al.  Sustainable Consumption: Opportunities for Consumer Research and Public Policy , 2011 .

[29]  Juho Hamari,et al.  The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  Lucy Atkinson Green moms: the social construction of a green mothering identity via environmental advertising appeals , 2014 .

[31]  T. Abel,et al.  Landscape and well-being: a scoping study on the health-promoting impact of outdoor environments , 2010, International Journal of Public Health.

[32]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[33]  Teresa Davis,et al.  Advertising food in Australia: Between antinomies and gastro‐anomy , 2010 .

[34]  A. Tukker,et al.  Environmental Impacts of Products:Policy Relevant Information and Data Challenges , 2006 .

[35]  Michelle Renee Nelson,et al.  Downshifting Consumer = Upshifting Citizen? An Examination of a Local Freecycle Community , 2007 .

[36]  Hélène de Burgh-Woodman,et al.  Sustainability and the human/nature connection: a critical discourse analysis of being “symbolically” sustainable , 2013 .

[37]  S. Fournier Special Session Summary Consumer Resistance: Societal Motivations, Consumer Manifestations, and Implications in the Marketing Domain , 1998 .

[38]  Marcus Felson,et al.  Community Structure and Collaborative Consumption: A Routine Activity Approach , 1978 .

[39]  John L. Florell,et al.  Sharing , 1979 .

[40]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[41]  Oded Nov,et al.  Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community: A multidimensional perspective , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[42]  R. Basselier,et al.  The Rise of the Sharing Economy , 2023, BCP Business & Management.