An XFEM approach for modelling delamination in composite laminates

Abstract A First-order Shear Deformation Theory (FSDT) is chosen to simulate composite laminates in the linear and the geometrically non-linear regimes. The formulation is based on the Equivalent Single Layer (ESL) theory that fails to predict the delamination onset in composite laminates. The lack of resolving three-dimensional states and correct transverse stresses in this model is principally improved using post-processing. In order to precisely compute interlaminar stresses, a non-frictional linear adhesive contact model is applied in the context of the eXtended Finite Element Method (XFEM). The discontinuities are imposed within any arbitrary interface by enriching the displacement field. Thus two sub-domains define the plane of the discontinuity. Thereafter, the aforementioned adhesive contact can be formulated at the discontinued interface. Stress values are retrieved at nodal points using the interface constitutive equation. Consequently, the interface formulations are extended into the softening regime to model the delamination growth as a mixed-mode cohesive effect. The accuracy of the proposed method in predicting the interlaminar stresses and the delamination propagation is demonstrated by comparing the results with the ones available in literature. By combining the lower-order plate theory and the novel XFEM technique, the model is able to accurately calculate the delamination onset and the propagation with less computational effort.

[1]  G. J. Turvey,et al.  DR large deflection analysis of orthotropic mindlin plates with simply-supported and clamped-edge conditions , 1991 .

[2]  P. Camanho,et al.  Mixed-Mode Decohesion Finite Elements for the Simulation of Delamination in Composite Materials , 2002 .

[3]  M. A. Crisfield,et al.  Progressive Delamination Using Interface Elements , 1998 .

[4]  P. Ribeiro,et al.  Geometrically non-linear static analysis of unsymmetric composite plates with curvilinear fibres: p-version layerwise approach , 2014 .

[5]  J. N. Reddy,et al.  Modelling of thick composites using a layerwise laminate theory , 1993 .

[6]  M. Meo,et al.  A meshfree penalty-based approach to delamination in composites , 2009 .

[7]  António J.M. Ferreira,et al.  A formulation of the multiquadric radial basis function method for the analysis of laminated composite plates , 2003 .

[8]  René de Borst,et al.  Application of the Discontinuous Solid-Like Shell Element to Delamination , 2004 .

[9]  John C. Brewer,et al.  Quadratic Stress Criterion for Initiation of Delamination , 1988 .

[10]  Eugenio Oate,et al.  Structural Analysis with the Finite Element Method. Linear Statics: Beams, Plates and Shells - v. 2 , 2013 .

[11]  Michael W. Hyer,et al.  Stress Recovery in Composite Laminates , 2011 .

[12]  Ning Hu,et al.  Stable numerical simulations of propagations of complex damages in composite structures under transverse loads , 2007 .

[13]  J. Reddy Mechanics of laminated composite plates and shells : theory and analysis , 1996 .

[14]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Extended finite element method for cohesive crack growth , 2002 .

[15]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing , 1999 .

[16]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing , 1999 .

[17]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  A general methodology for deriving shear constrained Reissner‐Mindlin plate elements , 1992 .

[18]  Richard M. Barker,et al.  A Finite-Element Analysis Including Transverse Shear Effects for Applications to Laminated Plates , 1971 .

[19]  Ning Hu,et al.  Finite element simulation of delamination growth in composite materials using LS-DYNA , 2009 .

[20]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models , 2007 .

[21]  J. N. Reddy,et al.  Recovery of interlaminar stresses and strain energy release rates in composite laminates , 1999 .

[22]  Ireneusz Lapczyk,et al.  Progressive damage modeling in fiber-reinforced materials , 2007 .

[23]  J. L. Curiel Sosa,et al.  Delamination modelling of GLARE using the extended finite element method , 2012 .

[24]  C. Chia Nonlinear analysis of plates , 1980 .

[25]  M. Crisfield,et al.  Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues , 2001 .

[26]  L. Sluys,et al.  A level set model for delamination – Modeling crack growth without cohesive zone or stress singularity , 2012 .

[27]  de R René Borst,et al.  On the numerical integration of interface elements , 1993 .

[28]  Garth N. Wells,et al.  A solid‐like shell element allowing for arbitrary delaminations , 2003 .

[29]  Hiroshi Suemasu,et al.  X-FEM analyses of a thin-walled composite shell structure with a delamination , 2010 .

[30]  A. Vautrin,et al.  An interface debonding law subject to viscous regularization for avoiding instability: Application to the delamination problems , 2008 .

[31]  Victor Birman,et al.  On the Choice of Shear Correction Factor in Sandwich Structures , 2000, Mechanics of Sandwich Structures.

[32]  Christos Kassapoglou,et al.  Interlaminar stress recovery for three-dimensional finite elements , 2010 .

[33]  E. Barbero Finite element analysis of composite materials , 2007 .