Taking case out of the Person-Case Constraint

The Person-Case Constraint ( pcc ) is a restriction on co-occurring weak pronominal direct ( do ) and indirect objects ( io ) that restricts the person value of the do . This article presents a previously unnoticed variant of the pcc found in Slovenian, where the canonical pcc operates alongside a reverse pcc , where the restriction applies to the io . This pattern is not predicted by standard syntactic approaches to the pcc (which rely on inherent asymmetries between the io and do ). It is argued that the pcc (in all its forms) arises with pronouns that are inherently unspecified for a person value and need to receive it externally from a functional head via Agree. The structurally higher pronoun blocks the structurally lower pronoun from receiving a person value, giving rise to the pcc . The reverse pcc then arises due to optional do -over- io clitic movement prior to person valuation. The proposed analysis is shown to capture cross-linguistic variation regarding the pcc including the Strong/Weak pcc split, which is attributed to a variation in the structure of pronouns. The article also establishes a cross-linguistic typology of the reverse pcc , where the reverse pcc exists exclusively as an optional pattern alongside the baseline pcc pattern.

[1]  L. Haegeman,et al.  Negative Concord and (Multiple) Agree: A Case Study of West Flemish , 2010, Linguistic Inquiry.

[2]  K Abels,et al.  Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding , 2003 .

[3]  Ž. Bošković.  On Unvalued Uninterpretable Features , 2009 .

[4]  Knut Tarald Taraldsen,et al.  On Agreement and Nominative Objects in Icelandic , 1995 .

[5]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[6]  Jean-Yves Pollock.  Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP , 1989 .

[7]  E. Anagnostopoulou.  The syntax of ditransitives : evidence from clitics , 2003 .

[8]  Ž. Bošković.  Now I’m a Phase, Now I’m Not a Phase: On the Variability of Phases with Extraction and Ellipsis , 2014, Linguistic Inquiry.

[9]  Adrian Stegovec.  Between you and me: Two Crosslinguistic Generalizations on Person Restrictions , 2017 .

[10]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  The Syntax of Agreement and Concord , 2008 .

[11]  Noam Chomsky.  Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[12]  Želijko Boskovic.  Clitics as Nonbranching Elements and the Linear Correspondence Axiom , 2002 .

[13]  Peter W. Smith,et al.  Feature Mismatches: Consequences for Syntax, Morphology and Semantics , 2015 .

[14]  Željko Bošković,et al.  Rescue by PF Deletion, Traces as (Non)interveners, and the That-Trace Effect , 2011 .

[15]  Morris Halle,et al.  Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection , 1993 .

[16]  Noam Chomsky.  Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use , 1988 .

[17]  M. Řezáč.  The EPP in Breton: An Unvalued Categorial Feature , 2004 .

[18]  W. O'grady,et al.  Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse, and Empathy , 1987 .

[19]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing , 1988 .

[20]  Judith Aissen.  Tzotzil Clause Structure , 1987 .

[21]  M. Řezáč.  The Fine Structure of Cyclic Agree , 2003 .

[22]  Carol Rosen,et al.  Rethinking Southern Tiwa : the Geometry of a Triple-Agreement Language , 1990 .

[23]  Alessandro Duranti,et al.  Object clitic pronouns in Bantu and the topicality hierarchy , 2010 .

[24]  Adrian Stegovec,et al.  Not two sides of one coin: Clitic person restrictions and Icelandic quirky agreement , 2016 .

[25]  Applicative constructions in Maasai , 2004 .

[26]  John R. Moore,et al.  What Does It Take To Be A Dative Subject , 2000 .

[27]  Adrian Stegovec.  Obviā et Imperā ! A case for ‘ perspectival control ’ in directive clauses , 2016 .

[28]  M. McGinnis.  On Markedness Asymmetries in Person and Number , 2005 .

[29]  Omer Preminger,et al.  Agreement and Its Failures , 2014 .

[30]  Milena Milojević Sheppard,et al.  Negative) Imperatives in Slovene , 2002 .

[31]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Problems of projection , 2013 .

[32]  Hazel Pearson,et al.  The Sense of Self: Topics in the Semantics of De Se Expressions , 2013 .

[33]  ðeljko Boškoviƒ.  Unifying first and last conjunct agreement , 2009 .

[34]  A. Marantz.  Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions , 1993 .

[35]  Peggy Speas,et al.  Configurational Properties of Point of View Roles , 2011 .

[36]  Igor Mel’čuk,et al.  Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice , 1987 .

[37]  Susi Wurmbrand,et al.  The Domain of Agreement , 2005 .

[38]  Danny Fox,et al.  Cyclic Linearization of Syntactic Structure , 2005 .

[39]  M. Řezáč,et al.  Person Licensing and the Derivation of PCC Effects , 2003 .

[40]  eljko Bokovi.  On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree: An Even More Minimal Theory , 2007, Linguistic Inquiry.

[41]  Ofelia Zepeda,et al.  A Papago grammar , 1983 .

[42]  Željko Bošković,et al.  The copy theory of movement: A view from PF , 2007 .

[43]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  The Polysynthesis Parameter , 1995 .

[44]  Adrian Stegovec,et al.  Perspectival control and obviation in directive clauses , 2019, Natural Language Semantics.

[45]  Hagit Borer,et al.  Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages , 1984 .

[46]  Karlos Arregi,et al.  Morphotactics: Basque Auxiliaries and the Structure of Spellout , 2012 .

[47]  Milan Rezac,et al.  Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of Language , 2010 .

[48]  A Nevins,et al.  An Apparent `Number Case Constraint' in Romanian: The Role of Syncretism , 2010 .

[49]  Laura Kalin,et al.  Aspect splits without ergativity , 2014 .

[50]  M. Starke,et al.  The Typology of Structural Deficiency. A Case Study of the Three Classes of Pronouns , 1999 .

[51]  B. Moskal.  Domains on the Border: Between Morphology and Phonology , 2015 .

[52]  eljko Bokovi.  Clitics as Nonbranching Elements and the Linear Correspondence Axiom , 2002, Linguistic Inquiry.

[53]  Die Personalpronomen im Zürichdeutschen , 1999 .

[54]  Nigel G. J. Richards,et al.  What Moves Where In Which Language , 1991 .

[55]  Marc Richards.  Defective Agree, Case Alternations, and the Prominence of Person , 2014 .

[56]  Francisco Ordóñez,et al.  Some Clitic Combinations in the Syntax of Romance , 2002 .

[57]  M. Řezáč.  Phi-Agree and theta-related Case , 2008 .

[58]  David M. Perlmutter.  Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax , 1973 .

[59]  Andrew Nevins,et al.  Multiple agree with clitics: person complementarity vs. omnivorous number , 2011 .

[60]  !? (Where’s the Ban on Imperative Questions?) , 2017 .

[61]  On the Licensing of Pronominal Clitics : the Properties of Object Clitics in Spanish and Catalan * , 2002 .

[62]  Omer Preminger,et al.  Breaking Agreements: Distinguishing Agreement and Clitic Doubling by Their Failures , 2009, Linguistic Inquiry.

[63]  J. Bobaljik,et al.  Two Heads Aren’t Always Better Than One , 2002 .

[64]  Elena Anagnostopoulou,et al.  Notes on the Person Case Constraint in Germanic (with special reference to German) , 2008 .

[65]  Željko Bošković,et al.  On the Nature of the Syntax-Phonology Interface: Cliticization and Related Phenomena , 2001 .

[66]  Bonet i Alsina,et al.  Morphology after syntax : pronominal clitics in romance , 1991 .

[67]  Kristina Riedel,et al.  The Syntax of Object Marking in Sambaa: A comparative Bantu perspective , 2009 .

[68]  Irene P. Warburton,et al.  Modern Greek clitic pronouns and the ‘surface structure constraints’ hypothesis , 1977, Journal of Linguistics.

[69]  Pablo Albizu.  Generalized person-case constraint: a case for a syntax-driven inflectional morphology , 2013 .

[70]  Norbert Corver,et al.  The copy theory of movement , 2007 .

[71]  Norvin Richards,et al.  Movement in Language: Interactions and Architectures , 2001 .

[72]  A. Kratzer.  Making a Pronoun: Fake Indexicals as Windows into the Properties of Pronouns , 2009, Linguistic Inquiry.

[73]  Juan Romero,et al.  The Object Agreement Constraint , 2007 .

[74]  Milan Rezac,et al.  Cyclic Agree , 2009, Linguistic Inquiry.

[75]  Brown,et al.  Constraining XP Sequences , 1995 .

[76]  Ken Hiraiwa,et al.  Multiple Agree and the Defective Intervention Constraint in Japanese * , 2002 .

[77]  Susi Wurmbrand,et al.  Notes on Agreement in Itelmen , 2002 .

[78]  S. Franks.  Parameters of Slavic morphosyntax , 1995 .

[79]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Problems of projection: Extensions , 2015 .

[80]  David Adger,et al.  Syntax and Syncretisms of the Person Case Constraint , 2007 .

[81]  S. Franks.  Clitics are/become Minimal(ist) , 2016 .

[82]  Uwe Junghanns,et al.  Two reflexive markers in Slavic , 2010 .

[83]  Martin Walkow,et al.  Goals, Big and Small , 2012 .

[84]  Ellen Woolford,et al.  More on the Anaphor Agreement Effect , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[85]  H. Harley,et al.  Person and Number in Pronouns: A Feature-Geometric Analysis , 2002 .

[86]  E. Bonet,et al.  The person-case constraint: a morphological approach , 1994 .

[87]  G. Cinque.  Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective , 1999 .

[88]  Jelena Runić.  The Person-Case Constraint: A Morphological Consensus , 2013 .

[89]  Josef Vachek,et al.  Β. FUNCTIONAL SYNTAX , 1975 .

[90]  D. Pesetsky,et al.  The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features , 2006 .

[91]  Mario Montalbetti,et al.  After binding : on the interpretation of pronouns , 1984 .

[92]  M. Saito.  (A) Case for labeling: labeling in languages without ɸ-feature agreement , 2015 .

[93]  M. Baker,et al.  The Macroparameter in a Microparametric World , 2008 .

[94]  Hiroyuki Ura,et al.  Multiple Feature-Checking: A Theory of Grammatical Function Splitting , 1998 .

[95]  Marios Mavrogiorgos,et al.  Clitics in Greek: A minimalist account of proclisis and enclisis , 2010 .

[96]  Anna Cardinaletti,et al.  On different types of clitic clusters , 2007 .

[97]  Arhonto Terzi.  Clitic Combinations, Their Hosts and Their Ordering , 1999 .

[98]  Ž. Bošković.  On the clitic switch in Greek imperatives , 2004 .

[99]  M. Starke,et al.  The Typology of Structural Deficiency : on the Three Grammatical Classes , 1994 .

[100]  Richard S. Kayne.  The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[101]  K. M. Migdalski,et al.  The Syntax of Compound Tenses in Slavic , 2006 .

[102]  David M. Perlmutter.  Syntactic Representation, Syntactic Levels, and the Notion of Subject , 1982 .

[103]  Paul Portner,et al.  A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects , 2012 .

[104]  Željko Bošković,et al.  Be careful where you float your quantifiers , 2004 .

[105]  J. Bobaljik.  Morphosyntax : the syntax of verbal inflection , 1995 .

[106]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Minimalist inquiries : the framework , 1998 .

[107]  J. Bobaljik,et al.  Subject positions and the roles of TP , 1996 .

[108]  Ken Hiraiwa,et al.  Dimensions of symmetry in syntax : agreement and clausal architecture , 2005 .

[109]  Oana Ciucivara,et al.  A syntactic analysis of pronominal clitic clusters in Romance The view from Romanian , 2009 .

[110]  Maria Polinsky,et al.  Revisiting the Person Case Constraint in Czech , 2011 .

[111]  Sandra Stjepanovic,et al.  What do second position cliticization, scrambling and multiple wh-fronting have in common? , 1999 .

[112]  Efthymia Georgala,et al.  Applicatives In Their Structural And Thematic Function: A Minimalist Account Of Multitransitivity , 2012 .

[113]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Introducing Arguments , 2002 .

[114]  久野 暲.  Functional syntax : anaphora, discourse and empathy , 1987 .

[115]  Carson T. Schütze.  Syncretism and double agreement with Icelandic nominative objects , 2003 .

[116]  Juan Uriagereka.  Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in western romance , 1995 .

[117]  E. Anagnostopoulou.  Strong and Weak Person Restrictions: A feature checking analysis , 2005 .

[118]  F. Nicol.  Romance clitic clusters: On diachronic changes and cross-linguistic contrasts , 2005 .

[120]  Isabelle Charnavel,et al.  The clitic binding restriction revisited: Evidence for antilogophoricity , 2015 .

[121]  M. Rivero.  Spanish Quirky Subjects, Person Restrictions, and the Person-Case Constraint , 2004, Linguistic Inquiry.

[122]  K Abels,et al.  *[P clitic]! – Why? , 2001 .

[123]  S. Wechsler.  Chapter 15. Self-ascription in conjunct-disjunct systems , 2018 .

[124]  T. Messick.  The Morphosyntax of Self-ascription: A Cross-linguistic Study , 2017 .

[125]  Howard Lasnik,et al.  Restricting the Theory of Transformations: A Case Study , 1990 .

[126]  Moira Yip,et al.  Case in Tiers , 1987 .

[127]  A. Nevins.  The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects , 2007 .

[128]  Danny Fox,et al.  Cyclic Linearization and its interaction with other aspects of grammar: a reply , 2005 .