Technology's four roles in understanding individuals' conservation of natural resources

An overview is presented of four ways in which human beings and technology interact with respect to the conservation of natural resources. The four roles technology plays are: (1) as intermediary, (2) as amplifier, (3) as determinant, and (4) as promoter of environmentally significant behavior. A review of pertinent literature supports the conclusion that behavioral scientists can contribute considerably to reducing overall environmental impact by analyzing human behavior and technology in concert. Problems and opportunities for interventions aimed to enhance resource conservation are discussed, such as rebound effects, allocation of control, and communication with users through technological-environmental and sensory inputs. A major conclusion is that well-designed technical environments, systems, and products have a great potential for supporting environmentally sustainable behavior.

[1]  P. Stern.  New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .

[2]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[3]  E. Hertwich.  Consumption and the Rebound Effect: An Industrial Ecology Perspective , 2005 .

[4]  D. McKenzie‐Mohr,et al.  Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[5]  Catherine Dillon.  Emotional responses to immersive media , 2007 .

[6]  O. Ahtola,et al.  Effects of Cost-Related Feedback on Consumer Knowledge and Consumption Behavior: A Field Experimental Approach , 1986 .

[7]  C. Midden,et al.  Mass‐Media Information Campaigns and Knowledge‐Gap Effects , 1997 .

[8]  N Moray,et al.  Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[9]  Adriaan Slob,et al.  User behavior and technology development : shaping sustainable relations between consumers and technologies , 2006 .

[10]  Ehrlich Ehrlich,et al.  Healing the Planet , 1992 .

[11]  Wander Jager,et al.  Simulating Human Behavior for Understanding and Managing Environmental Resource Use , 2007 .

[12]  Pallak,et al.  Commitment and energy conservation , 1980 .

[13]  Lt Lorna McCalley.  From motivation and cognition theories to everyday applications and back again: the case of product-integrated information and feedback , 2006 .

[14]  L. Steg,et al.  Normative, Gain and Hedonic Goal Frames Guiding Environmental Behavior , 2007 .

[15]  Gwendolyn Brandon,et al.  REDUCING HOUSEHOLD ENERGY CONSUMPTION: A QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE FIELD STUDY , 1999 .

[16]  Florian G. Kaiser,et al.  Disclosing situational constraints to ecological behavior : a confirmatory application of the mixed Rasch model , 2001 .

[17]  N.M.C. van Kesteren,et al.  Technological innovations and energy conservation: Satisfaction with and effectiveness of an in-business control system , 2006 .

[18]  S. Oskamp.  A sustainable future for humanity? How can psychology help? , 2000 .

[19]  P. J. Tichenor,et al.  MASS MEDIA FLOW AND DIFFERENTIAL GROWTH IN KNOWLEDGE , 1970 .

[20]  Osamu Saeki,et al.  Effectiveness of an energy-consumption information system for residential buildings , 2006 .

[21]  M. Newborough,et al.  Dynamic energy-consumption indicators for domestic appliances: environment, behaviour and design , 2003 .

[22]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Effects of Stereoscopic Presentation, Image Motion, and Screen Size on Subjective and Objective Corroborative Measures of Presence , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[23]  C. Vlek,et al.  A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation , 2005 .

[24]  Cjh Cees Midden,et al.  Communications about environmental risks and risk-reducing behaviour : the impact of fear on information processing. , 2001 .

[25]  F. Kaiser,et al.  The proposition of a general version of the theory of planned behavior: Predicting ecological behavior , 2003 .

[26]  Anthony Leiserowitz,et al.  Day After Tomorrow: Study of Climate Change Risk Perception , 2004 .

[27]  Cees J. H. Midden,et al.  The effects of errors on system trust, self-confidence, and the allocation of control in route planning , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[28]  Florian G. Kaiser,et al.  Goal-directed conservation behavior: the specific composition of a general performance , 2004 .

[29]  G. Bartels,et al.  Marketing for Sustainability. , 2002 .

[30]  Carmen Tanner,et al.  CONSTRAINTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOUR , 1999 .

[31]  Anton Gustafsson,et al.  The power-aware cord: energy awareness through ambient information display , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[32]  Lt Lorna McCalley,et al.  Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: The roles of goal-setting and social orientation , 2002 .

[33]  H. Wilke,et al.  Role of Negative Emotion in Communication about CO2 Risks , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[34]  P. Stern.  Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[35]  Jeannet H. Van Houwelingen,et al.  The Effect of Goal-Setting and Daily Electronic Feedback on In-Home Energy Use , 1989 .

[36]  M. Whitton,et al.  Effect of latency on presence in stressful virtual environments , 2003, IEEE Virtual Reality, 2003. Proceedings..

[37]  Linda Steg,et al.  ⊡ Human Behavior and Environmental Sustainability: Problems, Driving Forces, and Research Topics , 2007 .

[38]  R. Bruce Hutton,et al.  Evaluating Energy Conservation Programs , 1981 .

[39]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[40]  John Thøgersen,et al.  Spillover processes in the development of a sustainable consumption pattern , 1999 .

[41]  Florian G. Kaiser,et al.  The motivational and instantaneous behavior effects of contexts : steps towards a theory of goal-directed behavior , 2005 .

[42]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Presence within Virtual Environments as a Function of Visual Display Parameters , 1996, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[43]  M. Lombard,et al.  Presence and Television: The Role of Screen Size. , 2000 .

[44]  D. Greene,et al.  Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey , 2000 .

[45]  W. Jevons,et al.  On the Coal Question , 1873, Nature.

[46]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  The Effects of Pictorial Realism, Delay of Visual Feedback, and Observer Interactivity on the Subjective Sense of Presence , 1996, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[47]  C. Midden,et al.  Using feedback, reinforcement and information to reduce energy consumption in households: A field-experiment , 1983 .

[48]  Florian G. Kaiser,et al.  Contextual Conditions of Ecological Consumerism , 2004 .

[49]  T. Völlink,et al.  Go for less: the effect of feedback and goal setting on household energy and water consumption , 2004 .

[50]  Al Anneloes Meijnders,et al.  What's wrong with virtual trees? Restoring from stress in a mediated environment , 2006 .