Emergent semantics and cooperation in multi-knowledge environments: The ESTEEM architecture

In the present global society, information has to be exchangeable in open and dynamic environments, where interacting peers do not necessarily share a common understanding of the world at hand, and do not have a complete picture of the context where the interaction occurs. In this paper, we present the Esteem approach and the related peer architecture for emergent semantics in dynamic and multi-knowledge environments. In Esteem, semantic communities are built around declared interests in the form of manifesto ontologies, and their autonomous nature is preserved by allowing a shared semantics to naturally emerge from peer interactions.

[1]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  Data exchange: semantics and query answering , 2003, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[2]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Meteor-s web service annotation framework , 2004, WWW '04.

[3]  Maurizio Lenzerini Principles of P2P Data Integration , 2004, DIWeb.

[4]  Claudia Linnhoff-Popien,et al.  A Context Modeling Survey , 2004 .

[5]  Tiziana Catarci,et al.  Trusting Data Quality in Cooperative Information Systems , 2002, OTM.

[6]  Maarten van Steen,et al.  CYCLON: Inexpensive Membership Management for Unstructured P2P Overlays , 2005, Journal of Network and Systems Management.

[7]  Hector Garcia-Molina,et al.  Limited reputation sharing in P2P systems , 2004, EC '04.

[8]  Mariano Fernández-López,et al.  Ontological Engineering , 2003, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[9]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Remindin': semantic query routing in peer-to-peer networks based on social metaphors , 2004, WWW '04.

[10]  Carlo Curino,et al.  Context information for knowledge reshaping , 2009, Int. J. Web Eng. Technol..

[11]  Monica Scannapieco,et al.  Towards an Open Source Toolkit for Building Record Linkage Workflows , 2006 .

[12]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Emergent Semantics Principles and Issues , 2004, DASFAA.

[13]  Renée J. Miller,et al.  Mapping data in peer-to-peer systems: semantics and algorithmic issues , 2003, SIGMOD '03.

[14]  Dimitrios Gunopulos,et al.  Exploiting locality for scalable information retrieval in peer-to-peer networks , 2005, Inf. Syst..

[15]  Valeria De Antonellis,et al.  Ontology-based methodology for e-service discovery , 2006, Inf. Syst..

[16]  Karl Aberer,et al.  The chatty web: emergent semantics through gossiping , 2003, WWW '03.

[17]  Letizia Tanca,et al.  A methodology for a Very Small Data Base design , 2007, Inf. Syst..

[18]  Roberto Beraldi,et al.  TERA: topic-based event routing for peer-to-peer architectures , 2007, DEBS '07.

[19]  Dan Suciu,et al.  The Piazza peer data management system , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[20]  Paolo Bouquet,et al.  Peer-Mediated Distributed Knowledge Management , 2003, AMKM.

[21]  Anne H. H. Ngu,et al.  QoS-aware middleware for Web services composition , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[22]  Natalya F. Noy,et al.  Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches , 2004, SGMD.

[23]  Steffen Staab,et al.  A Metadata Model for Semantics-Based Peer-to-Peer Systems , 2003 .

[24]  Matthias Baldauf,et al.  A survey on context-aware systems , 2007, Int. J. Ad Hoc Ubiquitous Comput..

[25]  Maurizio Lenzerini,et al.  Data integration: a theoretical perspective , 2002, PODS.

[26]  Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.  TAP: a Semantic Web platform , 2003, Comput. Networks.

[27]  Silvana Castano,et al.  Semantically routing queries in peer-based systems: the H-Link approach , 2008, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[28]  Silvana Castano,et al.  Matching Ontologies in Open Networked Systems: Techniques and Applications , 2006, J. Data Semant..

[29]  Karl Aberer,et al.  Managing trust in a peer-2-peer information system , 2001, CIKM '01.

[30]  Luca De Santis,et al.  Automatic Record Matching in Cooperative Information Systems , 2002 .

[31]  Valeria De Antonellis,et al.  Semantic-Enriched Service Discovery , 2006, 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW'06).