Longitudinal Change in Knee Cartilage Thickness and Function in Subjects with and without MRI-Diagnosed Cartilage Damage

Objective Cartilage damage diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly prevalent in the population. In this article, we explore whether such cartilage damage is associated with greater longitudinal change in 3D cartilage thickness and knee function in subjects without (risk factors of) knee osteoarthritis. Design Eighty-two knees of Osteoarthritis Initiative healthy reference cohort participants had baseline and 4-year follow-up MRI and knee function data. Baseline presence of semiquantitatively assessed MRI-based cartilage damage (MOAKS [MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score] ≥ grade 1.0) was recorded by an experienced radiologist. Longitudinal femorotibial cartilage thickness change was determined after segmentation, using location-independent methodology. Knee function was evaluated by patient-reported outcomes and functional performance measures. Statistical comparisons included analysis of covariance adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index. Results Forty-five percent of the participants had cartilage damage in at least one femorotibial subregion; the cartilage thickness change score was 15% greater in participants with than in those without damage (1216 ± 434 vs. 1058 ± 277 µm). This difference reached borderline statistical significance with and without adjustment for age, sex, and body mass index (P = 0.05). No significant differences in the change of patient-reported outcomes of knee function (PASE [physical activity score of the elderly] and WOMAC [Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index]) or chair stand test results were detected. Of those without femorotibial damage, 58% had cartilage damage in at least one femoropatellar subregion; these had a 9% greater femorotibial cartilage change score than those without femoropatellar or femorotibial damage (difference not statistically significant). Conclusions In the absence of osteoarthritis risk factors, semiquantitatively assessed MRI-based cartilage damage appears to be associated with greater longitudinal location-independent femorotibial cartilage thickness changes, but not with greater functional deteriorations.

[1]  L. Sharma,et al.  Radiographically normal knees with contralateral joint space narrowing display greater change in cartilage transverse relaxtion time than those with normal contralateral knees: a model of early oa? - Data From The Osteoarthritis Initiative. , 2019, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[2]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Baseline structural tissue pathology is not strongly associated with longitudinal change in transverse relaxation time (T2) in knees without osteoarthritis. , 2019, European journal of radiology.

[3]  W. Wirth,et al.  Cartilage loss in radiographically normal knees depends on radiographic status of the contralateral knee - data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. , 2019, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[4]  L. Sharma,et al.  Knee tissue lesions and prediction of incident knee osteoarthritis over 7 years in a cohort of persons at higher risk. , 2017, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[5]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Location-independent analysis of structural progression of osteoarthritis-Taking it all apart, and putting the puzzle back together makes the difference. , 2017, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[6]  M. Nevitt,et al.  MRI findings associated with development of incident knee pain over 48 months: data from the osteoarthritis initiative , 2016, Skeletal Radiology.

[7]  L. Sharma,et al.  Baseline radiographic osteoarthritis and semi-quantitatively assessed meniscal damage and extrusion and cartilage damage on MRI is related to quantitatively defined cartilage thickness loss in knee osteoarthritis: the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study. , 2015, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[8]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Can structural joint damage measured with MR imaging be used to predict knee replacement in the following year? , 2015, Radiology.

[9]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Five‐Year Followup of Knee Joint Cartilage Thickness Changes After Acute Rupture of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament , 2015, Arthritis & rheumatology.

[10]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Imaging research results from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI): a review and lessons learned 10 years after start of enrolment , 2014, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[11]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Recent advances in osteoarthritis imaging—the Osteoarthritis Initiative , 2012, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[12]  Ali Guermazi,et al.  Prevalence of abnormalities in knees detected by MRI in adults without knee osteoarthritis: population based observational study (Framingham Osteoarthritis Study) , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  Thomas Baum,et al.  Obesity increases the prevalence and severity of focal knee abnormalities diagnosed using 3T MRI in middle-aged subjects—data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative , 2012, Skeletal Radiology.

[14]  R. Boudreau,et al.  Evolution of semi-quantitative whole joint assessment of knee OA: MOAKS (MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score). , 2011, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[15]  T. Mosher,et al.  Knee articular cartilage damage in osteoarthritis: analysis of MR image biomarker reproducibility in ACRIN-PA 4001 multicenter trial. , 2011, Radiology.

[16]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Reference values and Z-scores for subregional femorotibial cartilage thickness--results from a large population-based sample (Framingham) and comparison with the non-exposed Osteoarthritis Initiative reference cohort. , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[17]  Erika Schneider,et al.  The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[18]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  A Technique for Regional Analysis of Femorotibial Cartilage Thickness Based on Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  T. Mosher,et al.  Cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time mapping: overview and applications. , 2004, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.