Factors Affecting the Efficiency of the BRICSs' National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Study Based on Dea and Panel Data Analysis

Efficiency scores of the National Innovation System (NIS) for 22 countries, including the BRICS, G7, are calculated with the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Relevant factors that may affect the innovation system efficiency are summarized based on the NIS Approach and the New Growth Theory. Empirical study is further made with the Panel Data Analysis (PDA) and the Principal Component Analysis. The results of efficiency calculation and empirical test show that: (1) The BRICS differ greatly in the efficiency of NIS, with China, India and Russia ranking fairly high, and Brazil, South Africa among the few bottom; (2) The influencing factors involve a lot of elements, including the ICT infrastructure, enterprise RD (3) Enterprises innovation activities are of key importance to the NIS. To improve the efficiency of the innovation system, efforts should be made to improve the market circumstance, governance, and financial structure, and create a sound environment for innovation. (4) ICT infrastructure, economic scale and openness affect the diffusion of knowledge and technology, and in turn the NIS efficiency. (5) The BRICS have characters of low governance level and high natural resources dependency in common, which is determined by their developing stage and extensive growth pattern. To avoid the so called middle-income trap in the coming future, the BRICS should dedicate to transform the factor-driven pattern to an innovation-driven one. As for China, there is still much to be improved in the fields of ICT infrastructure, government governance, education system. During the 12th Planning, more efforts should be put into these fields and make better external conditions for innovation activities.

[1]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[2]  John A. Mathews,et al.  National innovative capacity in East Asia , 2005 .

[3]  Francisco J. Arcelus,et al.  On the efficiency of national innovation systems , 2003 .

[4]  C. Freeman Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems--complementarity and economic growth , 2002 .

[5]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[6]  Jeffrey L. Furman,et al.  The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity , 2000 .

[7]  Economic Development From the Perspective of Evolutionary Economic Theory , 2006 .

[8]  Seema Sharma,et al.  Using patents and publications to assess R&D efficiency in the states of the USA , 2011 .

[9]  Patel Parimal,et al.  National Innovation Systems: Why They Are Important, And How They Might Be Measured And Compared , 1994 .

[10]  B. Casu,et al.  A comparative study of efficiency in European banking , 2003 .

[11]  E. B. Viotti National Learning Systems - A new approach on technological change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea , 2002 .

[12]  Ning Ma,et al.  A study of the relationship between competitiveness and technological innovation capability based on DEA models , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Ayoe Hoff,et al.  Second stage DEA: Comparison of approaches for modelling the DEA score , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Xielin Liu,et al.  Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China’s transitional context , 2001 .

[15]  J. Mathews,et al.  China's national innovative capacity , 2008 .

[16]  Jeffrey L. Furman,et al.  Catching up or standing still? , 2004 .

[17]  Mark Setterfield,et al.  What is Endogenous Growth Theory , 2007 .