Effects of End Plates and Blockage on Low-Reynolds-Number Flows Over Airfoils

Measurements on airfoils at low Reynolds numbers can have a strong dependence on the experimental setup as a result of the sensitivity of the transitioning separated shear layer that develops over the model. In this investigation, the effects of two aspects of the experimental setup, namely end plates and test-section blockage, on lowReynolds-numberairfoilexperiments areexploredthroughmeasurementsonaNACA0018airfoilmodelatachord Reynolds number of 100,000. The improvement in mean spanwise uniformity with end plates installed is quantified and demonstrates the importance of using end plates in two-dimensional airfoil experiments at low Reynolds numbers. Consistent with previous studies on the use of end plates on circular cylinder models, it is found that mean quantities measured on the center-span plane are least sensitive to end-plate spacing for spacings greater than roughly 7 times the projected model thickness. It is shown that the end-plate configuration affects vortex-shedding characteristics and disturbance amplification in the separated shear layer. Blockage effects are investigated by comparing measurements before andafter adaptive-wall test-section streamlining forsolid-blockage ratios between 4 and 8%. These blockage ratios are shown to cause errors in lift as high as 9% of the maximum lift and 3.5% in the wake vortex-shedding frequency. The results of this investigation can be used to estimate the effects of blockage on flow development in low-Reynolds-number airfoil experiments. It is demonstrated that a common blockagecorrectionmethodcanaccuratelycorrectliftmeasurementsformoderateblockagesinlow-Reynolds-numberairfoil experiments for conditions under which a separation bubble forms over the model.

[1]  E. D. Obasaju DiscussionOn the effects of end plates on the mean forces on square sectioned cylinders , 1979 .

[2]  Peter Stansby,et al.  The effects of end plates on the base pressure coefficient of a circular cylinder , 1974, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[3]  Hussain H. Al-Kayiem,et al.  Velocity calibration relationships for hot-wire anemometry , 1988 .

[4]  S. Yarusevych,et al.  Novel Time-Resolved Pressure Measurements on an Airfoil at Low Reynolds Numbers , 2011 .

[5]  Peter W. Bearman,et al.  Investigation of the flow behind a two-dimensional model with a blunt trailing edge and fitted with splitter plates , 1965, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  Serhiy Yarusevych,et al.  Vortex Shedding of an Airfoil at Low Reynolds Numbers , 2011 .

[7]  S. Katzoff,et al.  Wind-tunnel-wall corrections , 1948 .

[8]  Thomas J. Mueller,et al.  Effect of Endplates on Two-Dimensional Airfoil Testing at Low Reynolds Number , 2001 .

[9]  Stephen W.D. Wolf Adaptive wall technology for improved wind tunnel testing techniques—A review , 1995 .

[10]  T. A. Fox,et al.  On the use of end plates with circular cylinders , 1990 .

[11]  G. P. Russo,et al.  An experimental comparison of two adaptation strategies in an adaptive-walls wind-tunnel , 1995 .

[13]  N. Fujisawa,et al.  Experimental study on flow and noise characteristics of NACA0018 airfoil , 2007 .

[14]  Stephen W. D. Wolf The design and operational development of self-streamlining two-dimensional flexible walled test sections , 1983 .

[15]  John Foss,et al.  Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics , 2007 .

[16]  Thomas J. Mueller,et al.  Low Reynolds Number Vehicles , 1985 .

[17]  Thomas J. Mueller,et al.  Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics of Low-Aspect-Ratio, Thin/Flat/Cambered-Plate Wings , 2000 .

[18]  W. Nitsche,et al.  Update on progress in adaptive wind tunnel wall technology , 2004 .

[19]  J. Marchman Aerodynamic testing at low Reynolds numbers , 1986 .

[20]  E. C. Maskell,et al.  A Theory of the Blockage Effects on Bluff Bodies and Stalled Wings in a Closed Wind Tunnel , 1963 .

[21]  Uwe Ganzer,et al.  A review of adaptive wall wind tunnels , 1985 .

[22]  Hongxing Yang,et al.  The ultra-low Reynolds number airfoil wake , 2010 .

[24]  C. Apelt,et al.  The effects of tunnel blockage and aspect ratio on the mean flow past a circular cylinder with Reynolds numbers between 104 and 105 , 1982, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  L. J. Pohlen,et al.  The influence of free-stream disturbances on low Reynolds number airfoil experiments , 1983 .

[26]  K. R. Cooper,et al.  Extensions to Maskell’s theory for blockage effects on bluff bodies in a closed wind tunnel , 2001, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[27]  Stephen W. D. Wolf,et al.  Predictive wall adjustment strategy for two-dimensional flexible walled adaptive wind tunnel: A detailed description of the first one-step method , 1988 .

[28]  J. G. Kawall,et al.  A digital technique for the simultaneous measurement of streamwise and lateral velocities in turbulent flows , 1983, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[29]  W. A. Mair,et al.  VORTEX WAKES OF BLUFF CYLINDERS IN SHEAR FLOW , 1975 .

[30]  S. H. Chue,et al.  Pressure probes for fluid measurement , 1975 .

[31]  Ryan J Gerakopulos,et al.  Novel Time-Resolved Pressure Measurements on an Airfoil at a Low Reynolds Number , 2012 .

[32]  H. C. Garner,et al.  SUBSONIC WIND TUNNEL WALL CORRECTIONS , 1966 .

[33]  Tim Lee,et al.  Investigation of flow over an oscillating airfoil , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[34]  Yoshinobu Kubo,et al.  Effects of end plates and blockage of structural members on drag forces , 1989 .

[35]  I. Tani Low-speed flows involving bubble separations , 1964 .

[36]  W. A. Timmer Two-Dimensional Low-Reynolds Number Wind Tunnel Results for Airfoil NACA 0018 , 2008 .

[37]  S. Yarusevych,et al.  On vortex shedding from an airfoil in low-Reynolds-number flows , 2009, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[38]  Theodore G. Ayers,et al.  Review of Flight-to-Wind-Tunnel Drag Correlation Edwin , 1982 .

[39]  Peter W. Bearman,et al.  Aspect ratio and end plate effects on vortex shedding from a circular cylinder , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[40]  T. Mueller,et al.  Laminar separation bubble characteristics on an airfoil at low Reynolds numbers , 1987 .

[41]  Robert J. Moffat,et al.  Describing the Uncertainties in Experimental Results , 1988 .