A unified finite element algorithm for two-equation models of turbulence

Abstract This paper presents a simple change of dependent variables for turbulence quantities that achieves two goals: the resulting formulation preserves positivity of all turbulence variables; and leads naturally to a simple algorithm applicable to all two-equation models of turbulence. It is also a useful means for comparing the structure of different turbulence models. The approach consists in solving for the natural logarithm of the turbulence variables. The methodology is illustrated by applying it to three popular models: the standard k – ϵ model; the k – τ model of Speziale; and the k – ω model of Wilcox. When logarithmic variables are used, transport equations for one model are obtained by adding or subtracting those from another model and by using the simple relationships that exist between the logarithms of k , ϵ , ω and τ . An existing adaptive finite element algorithm developed for the logarithmic form of the k – ϵ model is applied to the other models without any change. The formulation is verified on a shear layer possessing a closed form solution. The approach is then applied to turbulent flow over backward facing step for which measurements are available. Computations show that solutions of controlled accuracy can be achieved using the same solution algorithm for all models thus opening the way to systematic comparison studies.

[1]  Michael S. Shur,et al.  Comparative numerical testing of one- and two-equation turbulence models for flows with separation and reattachment , 1995 .

[2]  Dominique Pelletier,et al.  Adaptive Remeshing for the k-Epsilon Model of Turbulence , 1997 .

[3]  P. Raviart,et al.  Conforming and nonconforming finite element methods for solving the stationary Stokes equations I , 1973 .

[4]  Nahmkeon Hur,et al.  A highly-resolved numerical study of turbulent separated flow past a backward-facing step , 1991 .

[5]  P. Chou On velocity correlations and the solutions of the equations of turbulent fluctuation , 1945 .

[6]  T. Barth,et al.  A one-equation turbulence transport model for high Reynolds number wall-bounded flows , 1990 .

[7]  D. Pelletier,et al.  Positivity preserving formulations for adaptive solution of two-equation models of turbulence , 1996 .

[8]  L. Franca,et al.  Stabilized finite element methods. II: The incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 1992 .

[9]  Dominique Pelletier,et al.  AN ADAPTIVE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR A TWO- EQUATION TURBULENCE MODEL IN WALL-BOUNDED FLOWS , 1997 .

[10]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part 1: The recovery technique , 1992 .

[11]  D. Pelletier,et al.  An adaptive finite element method for turbulent heat transfer , 1996 .

[12]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part 2: Error estimates and adaptivity , 1992 .

[13]  D. Pelletier,et al.  An Adaptive Finite Element Scheme for Turbulent Free Shear Flows , 1997 .

[14]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Adaptive remeshing for compressible flow computations , 1987 .

[15]  F. Menter ZONAL TWO EQUATION k-w TURBULENCE MODELS FOR AERODYNAMIC FLOWS , 1993 .

[16]  R. Nichols Development and validation of a two-equation turbulence model with wall functions for compressible flow , 1996 .

[17]  D. Wilcox Turbulence modeling for CFD , 1993 .

[18]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[19]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[20]  D. Knight,et al.  A Navier-Stokes algorithm for turbulent flows using an unstructured grid and flux difference splitting , 1994 .

[21]  D. Pelletier,et al.  A pressure based adaptive finite element algorithm for compressible viscous flows , 1996 .

[22]  Tuan Ngo,et al.  Numerical solution of turbulent flow past a backward facing step using a nonlinear K-epsilon model , 1987 .

[23]  D. C. Wilcox,et al.  Turbulence-Model Predictions for Turbulent Boundary Layers , 1974 .

[24]  F. Menter Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows , 1992 .

[25]  T. Hughes,et al.  A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: V. Circumventing the Babuscka-Brezzi condition: A stable Petrov-Galerkin formulation of , 1986 .

[26]  Dominique Pelletier,et al.  Positivity Preservation and Adaptive Solution for the k-? Model of Turbulence , 1998 .

[27]  M. Nallasamy,et al.  Turbulence models and their applications to the prediction of internal flows: a review , 1987 .

[28]  T. Hughes,et al.  The Galerkin/least-squares method for advective-diffusive equations , 1988 .

[29]  Ridha Abid,et al.  A critical evaluation of two-equation models for near wall turbulence , 1990 .