Realization Theorems for Justification Logics: Full Modularity

Justification logics were introduced by Artemov ini¾ź1995 to provide intuitionistic logic with a classical provability semantics, a problem originally posed by Godel. Justification logics are refinements of modal logics and formally connected to them by so-called realization theorems. A constructive proof of a realization theorem typically relies on a cut-free sequent-style proof system for the corresponding modal logic. A uniform realization theorem for all the modal logics of the so-called modal cube, i.e.,i¾źfor the extensions of the basic modal logici¾źK with any subset of the axiomsi¾źd, t, b, 4,i¾źandi¾ź5, has been proven using nested sequents. However, the proof was not modular in that some realization theorems required postprocessing in the form of translation on the justification logic side. This translation relied on additional restrictions on the language of the justification logic in question, thus, narrowing the scope of realization theorems. We present a fully modular proof of the realization theorems for the modal cube that is based on modular nested sequents introduced by Marin and Straβburger.

[1]  Richard L. Mendelsohn,et al.  First-Order Modal Logic , 1998 .

[2]  Lutz Straßburger,et al.  On Nested Sequents for Constructive Modal Logics , 2015, Log. Methods Comput. Sci..

[3]  Sergei N. Artëmov Explicit provability and constructive semantics , 2001, Bull. Symb. Log..

[4]  Christopher Smith,et al.  Volume 10 , 2021, Engineering Project Organization Journal.

[5]  Roman Kuznets,et al.  Self-Referential Justifications in Epistemic Logic , 2010, Theory of Computing Systems.

[6]  Melvin Fitting,et al.  The logic of proofs, semantically , 2005, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[7]  Yevgeny Kazakov,et al.  On logic of knowledge with justifications , 1999 .

[8]  Raul Hakli,et al.  Does the deduction theorem fail for modal logic? , 2011, Synthese.

[9]  Thomas Studer,et al.  Realizing public announcements by justifications , 2014, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[10]  Kai Brünnler,et al.  Deep sequent systems for modal logic , 2009, Arch. Math. Log..

[11]  J. Davenport Editor , 1960 .

[12]  F. J. Pelletier,et al.  316 Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic , 1982 .

[13]  Melvin Fitting Realizations and LP , 2009, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[14]  Melvin Fitting,et al.  Realization using the model existence theorem , 2016, J. Log. Comput..

[15]  Natalia Rubtsova On Realization of S5-modality by Evidence Terms , 2006, J. Log. Comput..

[16]  Junhua Yu,et al.  Self-referentiality of Brouwer-Heyting-Kolmogorov semantics , 2014, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[17]  Lutz Straßburger,et al.  Label-free Modular Systems for Classical and Intuitionistic Modal Logics , 2014, Advances in Modal Logic.

[18]  Melvin Fitting,et al.  Modal interpolation via nested sequents , 2015, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[19]  Melvin Fitting Nested Sequents for Intuitionistic Logics , 2014, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[20]  Roman Kuznets,et al.  Realization for justification logics via nested sequents: Modularity through embedding , 2012, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[21]  Roman Kuznets,et al.  Making knowledge explicit: How hard it is , 2006, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[22]  Sergei N. Artëmov Justification Logic , 2008, JELIA.

[23]  M. de Rijke,et al.  Modal Logic , 2001, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science.