Stomatal acclimation over a subambient to elevated CO2 gradient in a C3/C4 grassland

An investigation to determine whether stomatal acclimation to [CO 2 ] occurred in C 3 /C 4 grassland plants grown across a range of [CO 2 ] (200‐550 µ mol mol − − − 1 ) in the field was carried out. Acclimation was assessed by measuring the response of stomatal conductance ( g s ) to a range of intercellular CO 2 (a g s ‐ C i curve) at each growth [CO 2 ] in the third and fourth growing seasons of the treatment. The g s ‐ C i response curves for Solanum dimidiatum (C 3 perennial forb) differed significantly across [CO 2 ] treatments, suggesting that stomatal acclimation had occurred. Evidence of non‐linear stomatal acclimation to [CO 2 ] in this species was also found as maximum g s ( g smax ; g s measured at the lowest C i ) increased with decreasing growth [CO 2 ] only below 400 µ mol mol − 1 . The substantial increase in g s at subambient [CO 2 ] for S. dimidiatum was weakly correlated with the maximum velocity of carboxylation ( V cmax ; r 2 = 0·27) and was not associated with CO 2 saturated photosynthesis ( A max ). The response of g s to C i did not vary with growth [CO 2 ] in Bromus japonicus (C 3 annual grass) or Bothriochloa ischaemum (C 4 perennial grass), suggesting that stomatal acclimation had not occurred in these species. Stomatal density, which increased with rising [CO 2 ] in both C 3 species, was not correlated with g s . Larger stomatal size at subambient [CO 2 ], however, may be associated with stomatal acclimation in S. dimidiatum . Incorporating stomatal acclimation into modelling studies could improve the ability to predict changes in ecosystem water fluxes and water availability with rising CO 2 and to understand their magnitudes relative to the past.

[1]  Responses in stomatal conductance to elevated CO2 in 12 grassland species that differ in growth form , 1996, Vegetatio.

[2]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  CO2 alters water use, carbon gain, and yield for the dominant species in a natural grassland , 1994, Oecologia.

[3]  D. M. Gates,et al.  Interactive effects of light, leaf temperature, CO2 and O2 on photosynthesis in soybean , 1985, Planta.

[4]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves , 1981, Planta.

[5]  H. W. Polley,et al.  Increasing CO2 and plant-plant interactions: effects on natural vegetation , 2004, Vegetatio.

[6]  K. Griffin,et al.  Effects of low and elevated CO2 on C3 and C4 annuals , 2004, Oecologia.

[7]  K. Griffin,et al.  Effects of low and elevated CO2 on C3 and C4 annuals , 2004, Oecologia.

[8]  H. W. Polley,et al.  Gas exchange and photosynthetic acclimation over subambient to elevated CO 2 in a C 3 -C 4 grassland , 2001 .

[9]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf gas exchange responses of 13 prairie grassland species to elevated CO2 and increased nitrogen supply , 2001 .

[10]  J. Bunce Direct and acclimatory responses of stomatal conductance to elevated carbon dioxide in four herbaceous crop species in the field , 2001 .

[11]  J. Morison,et al.  Stomatal acclimation to increased CO2 concentration in a Florida scrub oak species Quercus myrtifolia Willd , 2001 .

[12]  J. R. Coleman,et al.  Effects of low atmospheric CO(2) on plants: more than a thing of the past. , 2001, Trends in plant science.

[13]  J. Coleman,et al.  Elevated CO2 increases productivity and invasive species success in an arid ecosystem , 2000, Nature.

[14]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Root water uptake and transport: using physiological processes in global predictions. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[15]  H. W. Polley,et al.  Elongated chambers for field studies across atmospheric CO2 gradients. , 2000 .

[16]  J. Ward,et al.  Is atmospheric CO2 a selective agent on model C3 annuals? , 2000, Oecologia.

[17]  S. Wand,et al.  Responses of wild C4 and C3 grass (Poaceae) species to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration: a meta‐analytic test of current theories and perceptions , 1999 .

[18]  James F. Reynolds,et al.  VALIDITY OF EXTRAPOLATING FIELD CO2 EXPERIMENTS TO PREDICT CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS , 1999 .

[19]  A. Knapp,et al.  Biomass production and species composition change in a tallgrass prairie ecosystem after long‐term exposure to elevated atmospheric CO2 , 1999 .

[20]  A. Jarvis,et al.  Stomatal behaviour, photosynthesis and transpiration under rising CO2. , 1999 .

[21]  C. Tucker,et al.  Interactions between vegetation and climate: radiative and physiological effects of doubled atmospheric co2 , 1999 .

[22]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  1 – Interactive Effects of Water Stress and Elevated CO2 on Growth, Photosynthesis, and Water Use Efficiency , 1999 .

[23]  C. Körner,et al.  Soil moisture dynamics of calcareous grassland under elevated CO2 , 1998, Oecologia.

[24]  C. Reid,et al.  Effects of elevated [CO2] and/or ozone on limitations to CO2 assimilation in soybean (Glycine max) , 1998 .

[25]  J. Morison Stomatal response to increased CO2 concentration , 1998 .

[26]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Ecosystem water fluxes for two grasslands in elevated CO2: a modeling analysis , 1998, Oecologia.

[27]  D. Sims,et al.  Nonlinearity of photosynthetic responses to growth in rising atmospheric CO2: an experimental and modelling study , 1998 .

[28]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  C4 photosynthesis, atmospheric CO2, and climate , 1997, Oecologia.

[29]  H. Visscher,et al.  Predicting the response of leaf stomatal frequency to a future CO2-enriched atmosphere: constraints from historical observations , 1997 .

[30]  B. Drake,et al.  MORE EFFICIENT PLANTS: A Consequence of Rising Atmospheric CO2? , 1997, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology.

[31]  G. J. Collatz,et al.  Comparison of Radiative and Physiological Effects of Doubled Atmospheric CO2 on Climate , 1996, Science.

[32]  J. Šantrůček,et al.  Acclimation of Stomatal Conductance to a CO2-Enriched Atmosphere and Elevated Temperature in Chenopodium album , 1996 .

[33]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Stomatal responses to increased CO2: implications from the plant to the global scale , 1995 .

[34]  B. Drake,et al.  Acclimation of photosynthesis in relation to Rubisco and non‐structural carbohydrate contents and in situ carboxylase activity in Scirpus olneyi grown at elevated CO2 in the field , 1995 .

[35]  A. Henderson‐sellers,et al.  Sensitivity of global climate model simulations to increased stomatal resistance and CO2 increases , 1995 .

[36]  D. Ackerly,et al.  Plant growth and reproduction along CO2 gradients: non‐linear responses and implications for community change , 1995 .

[37]  R. Sage Was low atmospheric CO2 during the Pleistocene a limiting factor for the origin of agriculture , 1995 .

[38]  David Pollard,et al.  Use of a land-surface-transfer scheme (LSX) in a global climate model: the response to doubling stomatal resistance , 1995 .

[39]  A. Knapp,et al.  Effect of Elevated CO2 on Stomatal Density and Distribution in a C4 Grass and a C3 Forb under Field Conditions , 1994 .

[40]  Z. Tuba,et al.  Response of Photosynthesis, Stomatal Conductance, Water Use Efficiency and Production to Long-Term Elevated CO2 in Winter Wheat , 1994 .

[41]  Jack A. Morgan,et al.  Consequences of growth at two carbon dioxide concentrations and two temperatures for leaf gas exchange in Pascopyrum smithii (C3) and Bouteloua gracilis (C4) , 1994 .

[42]  D. F. Parkhurst,et al.  Diffusion of CO2 and other gases inside leaves. , 1994, The New phytologist.

[43]  H. W. Polley,et al.  Stomatal density and aperture length in four plant species grown across a subambient CO2 gradient , 1993 .

[44]  F I Woodward,et al.  Ecophysiological responses of plants to global environmental change since the Last Glacial Maximum. , 1993, The New phytologist.

[45]  J. Jouzel,et al.  Extending the Vostok ice-core record of palaeoclimate to the penultimate glacial period , 1993, Nature.

[46]  H. Policy,et al.  Increase in C3 plant water-use efficiency and biomass over Glacial to present C02 concentrations , 1993, Nature.

[47]  R. Sage,et al.  Photosynthetic acclimation to sub-ambient CO2 (20 Pa) in the C3 annual Phaseolus vulgaris L. , 1992 .

[48]  H. W. Polley,et al.  Carbon Dioxide and Water Fluxes of C 3 Annuals and C 3 and C 4 Perennials at Subambient CO 2 Concentrations , 1992 .

[49]  Park S. Nobel,et al.  Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology , 1991 .

[50]  W. Schlesinger,et al.  Resource‐Use Efficiency and Drought Tolerance In Adjacent Great Basin and Sierran Plants , 1991 .

[51]  Catherine Potvin,et al.  THE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF ECOPHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE CURVES OBTAINED FROM EXPERIMENTS INVOLVING REPEATED MEASURES , 1990 .

[52]  C. Lorius,et al.  Vostok ice core provides 160,000-year record of atmospheric CO2 , 1987, Nature.

[53]  F. I. Woodward,et al.  Stomatal numbers are sensitive to increases in CO2 from pre-industrial levels , 1987, Nature.

[54]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  On the economy of plant form and function. , 1988 .

[55]  T. Givnish Optimal stomatal conductance, allocation of energy between leaves and roots, and the marginal cost of transpiration , 1986 .

[56]  H. Jones Partitioning stomatal and non‐stomatal limitations to photosynthesis , 1985 .

[57]  P. Kramer 13 – Drought Tolerance and Water Use Efficiency , 1983 .

[58]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity , 1979, Nature.

[59]  Yann Kerr,et al.  Soil Moisture , 1922, Botanical Gazette.

[60]  J. Ward,et al.  Strain Is atmospheric CO 2 a selective agent on model C 3 annuals ? , 2022 .