The Four Literatures of Social Science

This chapter reviews bibliometric studies of the social sciences and humanities. SSCI bibliometrics will work reasonably well in economics and psychology, whose literatures share many characteristics with science, and less well in sociology, characterised by a typical social science literature. The premise of the chapter is that quantitative evaluation of research output faces severe methodological difficulties in fields whose literature differs in nature from scientific literature. Bibliometric evaluations are based on international journal literature indexed in the SSCI, but social scientists also publish books, write for national journals and for the non-scholarly press. These literatures form distinct, yet partially overlapping worlds, each serving a different purpose. For example, national journals communicate with a local scholarly community, and the non-scholarly press represents research in interaction with contexts of application. Each literature is more trans-disciplinary than its scientific counterpart, which itself poses methodological challenges. The nature and role of each of the literatures will be explored here, and the chapter will argue that by ignoring the three other literatures of social science bibliometric evaluation produces a distorted picture of social science fields.

[1]  William G. Madow,et al.  The Literature of the Social Sciences. , 1960 .

[2]  Carnot E. Nelson,et al.  Communication among scientists and engineers , 1970 .

[3]  Maurice B. Line The Influence of the Type of Sources used on the Results of citation analyses , 1979, J. Documentation.

[4]  Sydney J. Pierce Characteristics of Professional Knowledge Structures: Some Theoretical Implications of Citation Studies. , 1987 .

[5]  A. Nederhof Books and chapters are not to be neglected in measuring research productivity. , 1989 .

[6]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Some Aspects of Scholarly Communication in Linguistics: An Empirical Study. , 1990 .

[7]  D. Hicks,et al.  Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: A Reflexive Citation Analysis or Science Disciplines and Disciplining Science , 1991 .

[8]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Has the Study of Philosophy at Dutch Universities Changed under Economic and Political Pressures? , 1991 .

[9]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Quality Judgments of Journals as Indicators of Research Performance in the Humanities and the Social and Behavioral Sciences. , 1991 .

[10]  Urs Schoepflin,et al.  Problems of representativity in the social sciences citation index , 1992 .

[11]  A. Raan,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of six economics research groups: A comparison with peer review , 1993 .

[12]  Matthias Winterhager,et al.  Bibliometrische Basisdaten zur Entwicklung der Sozialwissenschaften in Deutschland , 1994 .

[13]  Peter M Burnhill,et al.  On measuring the relation between social science research activity and research publication , 1994 .

[14]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[15]  H. Ohly,et al.  Informations- und Wissensverarbeitung in den Sozialwissenschaften , 1994 .

[16]  Pam Royle,et al.  The Use of Bibliometric Indicators to Measure the Research Productivity of Australian Academics , 1994 .

[17]  W. Powell,et al.  Careers in Print: Books, Journals, and Scholarly Reputations , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A bibliometric study on ageing and reception processes of scientific literature , 1995, J. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: a study of sociology , 1997, J. Documentation.

[20]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[21]  Patrick Thomas A bibliometric analysis of fashions in management literature , 1997 .

[22]  Berenika M. Webster,et al.  Polish Sociology Citation Index as an example of usage of national citation indexes in scientometric analysis of social sciences , 1998, J. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A Bibliometric Study of Reference Literature in the Sciences and Social Sciences , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[24]  J. Sylvan Katz,et al.  Bibliometric indicators and the social sciences , 1999 .

[25]  Grant Lewison,et al.  Evaluation of books as research outputs in history of medicine , 2001 .

[26]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The changing composition of innovative activity in the US -- a portrait based on patent analysis , 2001 .

[27]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[28]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Towards Research Performance in the Humanities , 2002, Libr. Trends.

[29]  Michael Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Mode 2 in Societal Context*) , 2003 .

[30]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? , 2003, J. Documentation.

[31]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Visibility and impact of research in Psychiatry for North European countries in EU, US and world contexts , 2002, Scientometrics.

[32]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Assessing the quality of scholarly journals in Linguistics:An alternative to citation-based journal impact factors , 2001, Scientometrics.

[33]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The International Visibility and Citation Impact of Scandinavian Research Articles in Selected Social Science Fields: The Decay of a Myth , 2000, Scientometrics.

[34]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Research performance indicators for university departments: A study of an agricultural university , 1993, Scientometrics.

[35]  Berenika M. Winclawska,et al.  Polish Sociology Citation Index (principles for creation and the first results) , 2005, Scientometrics.

[36]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social and beha vioural sciences: A comparative study , 1989, Scientometrics.

[37]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Specialties and disciplines in science and social science: An examination of their structure using citation indexes , 1979, Scientometrics.

[38]  Francis Narin,et al.  Patent bibliometrics , 2005, Scientometrics.

[39]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A bibliometric approach to social sciences. National research performances in 6 selected social science areas, 1990–1992 , 2005, Scientometrics.

[40]  A. Villagrá Rubio,et al.  Scientific production of Spanish universities in the fields of Social Sciences and Language , 1992, Scientometrics.

[41]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A stochastic model for the ageing of scientific literature , 2005, Scientometrics.

[42]  Anton J. Nederhof,et al.  Mapping the social and behavioral sciences world-wide: Use of maps in portfolio analysis of national research efforts , 2006, Scientometrics.

[43]  Moshe Yitzhaki,et al.  The ‘language preference’ in sociology: Measures of ‘language self-citation’, ‘relative own-language preference indicator’, and ‘mutual use of languages’ , 2006, Scientometrics.

[44]  Anton J. Nederhof,et al.  Profiling institutes: Identifying high research performance and social relevance in the social and behavioral sciences , 1999, Scientometrics.

[45]  Diana Hicks,et al.  The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences , 1999, Scientometrics.

[46]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in journals covered by the SSCI database using reference analysis , 2006, Scientometrics.

[47]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Publication behaviour and international impact: Scandinavian clinical and social medicine, 1988–96 , 1999, Scientometrics.