Laboratory tests for single-event effects

Integrated circuits are currently tested at accelerators for their susceptibility to single-event effects (SEE's). However, because of the cost and limited accessibility associated with accelerator testing, there is considerable interest in developing alternate testing methods. Two laboratory techniques for measuring SEE, one involving a pulsed laser and the other /sup 252/Cf, are described in detail in this paper. The pulsed laser provides information on the spatial and temporal dependence of SEE, information that has proven invaluable in understanding and mitigating SEE in spite of the differences in the physical mechanisms responsible for SEE induced by light and by ions. Considerable effort has been expended on developing /sup 252/Cf as a laboratory test for SEE, but the technique has not found wide use because it is severely limited by the low energy and short range of the emitted ions that are unable to reach junctions either covered with dielectric layers or deep below the surface. In fact, there are documented cases where single-event latchup (SEL) testing with /sup 252/Cf gave significantly different results from accelerator testing. A detailed comparison of laboratory and accelerator SEE data is presented in this review in order to establish the limits of each technique.

[1]  James F. Ziegler,et al.  Handbook of Stopping Cross-Sections for Energetic Ions in All Elements , 1980 .

[2]  R Harboe-Sorensen,et al.  Cosmic Ray Simulation Experiments for the Study of Single Event Upsets and Latch-Up in CMOS Memories , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[3]  A. H. Johnston,et al.  Laser simulation of single-particle effects , 1992 .

[4]  A. Peczalski,et al.  Charge-collection mechanisms of heterostructure FETs , 1994 .

[5]  S. Buchner,et al.  Critical evaluation of the pulsed laser method for single event effects testing and fundamental studies , 1994 .

[6]  A. B. Campbell,et al.  Single-event dynamics of high-performance HBTs and GaAs MESFETs , 1993 .

[7]  Bharat L. Bhuva,et al.  Simulation of SEU transients in CMOS ICs , 1991 .

[8]  T. R. Weatherford,et al.  Laser confirmation of SEU experiments in GaAs MESFET combinational logic (for space application) , 1992 .

[9]  Martin Becker,et al.  A new method for using /sup 252/Cf in SEU testing (SRAM) , 1990 .

[10]  P. T. McDonald,et al.  Practical approach to ion track energy distribution , 1988 .

[11]  J. E. Vinson,et al.  Single Event Upset Rate Predictions for Complex Logic Systems , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[12]  Stephen LaLumondiere,et al.  Correlation of picosecond laser-induced latchup and energetic particle-induced latchup in CMOS test structures , 1995 .

[13]  J. S. Browning Single-event correlation between heavy ions and 252Cf fission fragments , 1990 .

[14]  W. R. Curtice,et al.  Elimination of charge-enhancement effects in GaAs FETs with a low-temperature grown GaAs buffer layer , 1995 .

[15]  A. B. Campbell,et al.  Pulsed laser-induced SEU in integrated circuits: a practical method for hardness assurance testing , 1990 .

[16]  R. Harboe-Sorensen,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Effect of Absorbers on the Let of the Fission Particles Emitted by CF-252 , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[17]  A. B. Campbell,et al.  Radiation characterization of the ADSP2100A digital signal processor , 1991 .

[18]  W. D. Raburn,et al.  Laser Simulation of Single Event Upsets , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[19]  J. C. Pickel,et al.  Use of CF-252 to Determine Parameters for SEU Rate Calculation , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[20]  R. C. Block,et al.  SEU tests with an improved Cf-252 system , 1993, RADECS 93. Second European Conference on Radiation and its Effects on Components and Systems (Cat. No.93TH0616-3).

[21]  A. B. Campbell,et al.  Implications of the spatial dependence of the single-event-upset threshold in SRAMs measured with a pulsed laser , 1994 .