Assessing Renewable Energy Production Capabilities Using DEA Window and Fuzzy TOPSIS Model

Climate change and air pollution are among the key drivers of energy transition worldwide. The adoption of renewable resources can act as a peacemaker and give stability regarding the damaging effects of fossil fuels challenging public health as well as the tension made between countries in global prices of oil and gas. Understanding the potential and capabilities to produce renewable energy resources is a crucial pre-requisite for countries to utilize them and to scale up clean and stable sources of electricity generation. This paper presents a hybrid methodology that combines the data envelopment analysis (DEA) Window model, and fuzzy technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (FTOPSIS) in order to evaluate the capabilities of 42 countries in terms of renewable energy production potential. Based on three inputs (population, total energy consumption, and total renewable energy capacity) and two outputs (gross domestic product and total energy production), DEA window analysis chose the list of potential countries, including Norway, United Kingdom, Kuwait, Australia, Netherlands, United Arab Emirates, United States, Japan, Colombia, and Italy. Following that, the FTOPSIS model pointed out the top three countries (United States, Japan, and Australia) that have the greatest capabilities in producing renewable energies based on five main criteria, which are available resources, energy security, technological infrastructure, economic stability, and social acceptance. This paper aims to offer an evaluation method for countries to understand their potential of renewable energy production in designing stimulus packages for a cleaner energy future, thereby accelerating sustainable development.

[1]  Mevlut Uyan.  GIS-based solar farms site selection using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in Karapinar region, Konya/Turkey , 2013 .

[2]  Prasun Chakraborti,et al.  Exploration of PROMETHEE II and VIKOR methodology in a MCDM approach for ascertaining the optimal performance-emission trade-off vantage in a hydrogen-biohol dual fuel endeavour , 2017 .

[3]  Eyup Dogan,et al.  The moderating role of renewable and non-renewable energy in environment-income nexus for ASEAN countries: Evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression , 2021 .

[4]  C. Kahraman,et al.  Evaluation of renewable energy alternatives using MACBETH and fuzzy AHP multicriteria methods: the case of Turkey , 2013 .

[5]  Ying Wang,et al.  Strategic renewable energy resources selection for Pakistan: Based on SWOT-Fuzzy AHP approach , 2020 .

[6]  Ömer Alkan,et al.  Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA , 2020 .

[7]  Artur Karczmarczyk,et al.  Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection , 2018, Omega.

[8]  A. Aslani,et al.  Energy security in Andalusia: The role of renewable energy sources , 2020 .

[9]  Lu Gan,et al.  Economic Feasibility Analysis for Renewable Energy Project Using an Integrated TFN–AHP–DEA Approach on the Basis of Consumer Utility , 2017 .

[10]  S. Schneider,et al.  A contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernment Panel on Climate Change , 2001 .

[11]  Chia-Nan Wang,et al.  Supporting Better Decision-Making: A Combined Grey Model and Data Envelopment Analysis for Efficiency Evaluation in E-Commerce Marketplaces , 2020, Sustainability.

[12]  Gi-Tae Yeo,et al.  Environmental efficiency analysis of port cities: Slacks-based measure data envelopment analysis approach , 2014 .

[13]  Kaidi Wan,et al.  Measurement and evolution of eco-efficiency of coal industry ecosystem in China , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[14]  Jin-Li Hu,et al.  Renewable energy and macroeconomic efficiency of OECD and non-OECD economies , 2007 .

[15]  Jin Zhong,et al.  Construction of a responsible investment composite index for renewable energy industry , 2015 .

[16]  Zacharoula Andreopoulou,et al.  Renewable energy sources: Using PROMETHEE II for ranking websites to support market opportunities , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[17]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[18]  Mohammad Aslam Uqaili,et al.  Multi-Criteria Analysis of Electricity Generation Scenarios for Sustainable Energy Planning in Pakistan , 2018 .

[19]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Role of renewable energy in China’s energy security and climate change mitigation: An index decomposition analysis , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[20]  He-Yau Kang,et al.  A DEA window analysis on the product family mix selection for a semiconductor fabricator , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  A. Paletto,et al.  Assessment of environmental impact of biomass power plants to increase the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies , 2019, Heliyon.

[22]  G. Nilay Yücenur,et al.  An integrated solution with SWARA&COPRAS methods in renewable energy production: City selection for biogas facility , 2020 .

[23]  Chia-Nan Wang,et al.  Analyzing Operational Efficiency in Real Estate Companies: An Application of GM (1,1) and DEA Malmquist Model , 2021, Mathematics.

[24]  Feng Zhang,et al.  An Analysis of the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problem for Distributed Energy Systems , 2018, Energies.

[25]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  P. Zhou,et al.  Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: A slacks-based efficiency measure , 2012 .

[27]  Mohd Amran Mohd Radzi,et al.  Spatial matching of large-scale grid-connected photovoltaic power generation with utility demand in Peninsular Malaysia , 2017 .

[28]  Amar Bennadji,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation of renewable energy alternatives for electricity generation in a residential building , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[29]  José Luis Zofío,et al.  Environmental efficiency and regulatory standards: the case of CO2 emissions from OECD industries , 2001 .

[30]  Gonzalo Escribano Francés,et al.  Energy security and renewable energy deployment in the EU: Liaisons Dangereuses or Virtuous Circle? , 2016 .

[31]  Lindsey Bressler,et al.  Energy security in Israel and Jordan: The role of renewable energy sources , 2019, Renewable Energy.

[32]  Arunodaya Raj Mishra,et al.  A novel approach to extended fuzzy TOPSIS based on new divergence measures for renewable energy sources selection , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[33]  Gokhan Sahin,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making in the location selection for a solar PV power plant using AHP , 2018, Measurement.

[34]  Tufan Demirel,et al.  MULTI-CRITERIA WIND POWER PLANT LOCATION SELECTION USING FUZZY AHP , 2008 .

[35]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul , 2010 .

[36]  Ommercial Banks.  Data Envelopment Analysis and Commercial Bank Performance : A Primer With Applications to Missouri Banks , 2003 .

[37]  Roghayeh Ghasempour,et al.  Analysis of Solar Farm Site Selection Based on TOPSIS Approach , 2018 .

[38]  S. Shah.  Feasibility study of renewable energy sources for developing the hydrogen economy in Pakistan , 2020 .

[39]  E. Chamanehpour,et al.  Site selection of wind power plant using multi-criteria decision-making methods in GIS: A case study , 2017 .

[40]  Y. Hamam,et al.  Selection of a Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for a Low-Income Household , 2019, Sustainability.

[41]  Reza Kiani Mavi,et al.  Energy and environmental efficiency of OECD countries in the context of the circular economy: Common weight analysis for malmquist productivity index. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[42]  R. Idris,et al.  GIS multi-criteria for power plant site selection , 2012, 2012 IEEE Control and System Graduate Research Colloquium.

[43]  Ilhan Talinli,et al.  A Holistic Approach for Wind Farm Site Selection by FAHP , 2017 .

[44]  Subhes C. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Sustainable Energy Development Index: A multi-dimensional indicator for measuring sustainable energy development , 2015 .

[45]  H. Gitinavard,et al.  A soft computing based-modified ELECTRE model for renewable energy policy selection with unknown information , 2017 .

[46]  Claudiu Cicea,et al.  Environmental efficiency of investments in renewable energy: Comparative analysis at macroeconomic level , 2014 .

[47]  Andrés Honrubia-Escribano,et al.  An AHP-based multi-criteria model for sustainable supply chain development in the renewable energy sector , 2020, Expert Syst. Appl..

[48]  H. Essid,et al.  The analysis of energy efficiency of the Mediterranean countries: A two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach , 2017 .

[49]  Bai-Chen Xie,et al.  Dynamic environmental efficiency evaluation of electric power industries: Evidence from OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) and BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries , 2014 .

[50]  P. Zhou,et al.  Total-factor carbon emission performance of the Chinese transportation industry: A bootstrapped non-radial Malmquist index analysis , 2015 .

[51]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[52]  Andrea Frattolillo,et al.  Development of a Geographical Information System (GIS) for the Integration of Solar Energy in the Energy Planning of a Wide Area , 2014 .

[53]  A. Aslani,et al.  Analysis of the robustness of energy supply in Japan: Role of renewable energy , 2020 .

[54]  Rakesh Kumar Bajaj,et al.  A robust decision making approach for hydrogen power plant site selection utilizing (R, S)-Norm Pythagorean Fuzzy information measures based on VIKOR and TOPSIS method , 2020 .

[55]  H. B. Milner.  Endeavour , 1965, Nature.

[56]  S. Solomon.  The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[57]  Merve Cengiz Toklu,et al.  Location selection for wind plant using AHP and axiomatic design in fuzzy environment , 2018, Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN).

[58]  George Halkos,et al.  Assessing 28 EU member states' environmental efficiency in national waste generation with DEA , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[59]  Xiao Wang,et al.  The comprehensive evaluation of renewable energy system schemes in tourist resorts based on VIKOR method , 2020 .

[60]  Jose Ignacio Munoz-Hernandez,et al.  Monte Carlo approach to fuzzy AHP risk analysis in renewable energy construction projects , 2019, PloS one.

[61]  Juozas Augutis,et al.  Impact of the Renewable Energy Sources on the Energy Security , 2014 .

[62]  Mads Troldborg,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from renewable energy sources: A review of lifecycle considerations , 2014 .

[63]  Ş. Cîrstea,et al.  Evaluating Renewable Energy Sustainability by Composite Index , 2018 .

[64]  Yunna Wu,et al.  An Internal Type-2 Trapezoidal Fuzzy Sets-PROMETHEE-II based Investment Decision Framework of Compressed Air Energy Storage Project in China under the Perspective of Different Investors , 2020 .

[65]  Victor Moutinho,et al.  Assessing eco-efficiency through the DEA analysis and decoupling index in the Latin America countries , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[66]  Dorothea Hilhorst,et al.  Synthesis Report , 2018, Reshaping Decentralised Development Co-operation.

[67]  Chia-Nan Wang,et al.  Hydrogen Power Plant Site Selection Under Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making (FMCDM) Environment Conditions , 2019, Symmetry.

[68]  Ümran Şengül,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey , 2015 .

[69]  A. Kengpol,et al.  Design of a decision support system for site selection using fuzzy AHP: A case study of solar power plant in north eastern parts of Thailand , 2012, 2012 Proceedings of PICMET '12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies.

[70]  Mara Madaleno,et al.  The economic and environmental efficiency assessment in EU cross-country: Evidence from DEA and quantile regression approach , 2017 .

[71]  Chia-Nan Wang,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Model for the Selection of Suppliers in the Textile Industry , 2020, Symmetry.

[72]  Pedro Macedo,et al.  A new frontier approach to model the eco-efficiency in European countries , 2015 .

[73]  Magdalena Ligus,et al.  Determination of most suitable low-emission energy technologies development in Poland using integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method , 2018, Energy Procedia.

[74]  Yanghon Chung,et al.  The static and dynamic environmental efficiency of renewable energy: A Malmquist index analysis of OECD countries , 2015 .

[75]  J. Arán Carrión,et al.  The electricity production capacity of photovoltaic power plants and the selection of solar energy sites in Andalusia (Spain) , 2008 .

[76]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance , 2006 .

[77]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Achievements of the European Union Countries in Seeking a Sustainable Electricity Sector , 2019, Energies.