Development and evaluation of potential accident scenarios involving pedestrians and AEB-equipped vehicles to demonstrate the efficiency of an enhanced open-source simulation framework.

This study introduces a method that allows the generation and safety evaluation of a scenario catalog derived from potential car-pedestrian conflict situations. It is based on open-source software components and uses the road layout standard OpenDRIVE to derive participants' motion profiles with the support of available accident data. The method was implemented upon the open-source framework openPASS and can simulate results for different active safety system setups and facilitates the prediction of system capabilities to decrease the relative impact velocities and collision configurations such as the point of impact. A demonstration case was performed where the scenario catalog was derived and used to evaluate pedestrian collisions with and without a generic autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system. The AEB system aims to intervene in the event of an impending collision and might affect the outcome of a baseline scenario. The study indicated a change in the collision configuration and identified conflict situations less affected by the system. A particularly interesting finding was that some scenarios even led to a higher number of collisions (at lower impact) for the AEB intervention in comparison to the baseline cases.

[1]  Harald Kolk Prospective evaluation of the collision severity of L7e vehicles considering a Collision Mitigation System , 2016 .

[2]  Yun-Pang Flötteröd,et al.  Microscopic Traffic Simulation using SUMO , 2018, 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[3]  Wolfgang Sinz,et al.  Method for future pedestrian accident scenario prediction , 2014 .

[4]  Oliver Bartels,et al.  An Open Simulation Approach to Identify Chances and Limitations for Vulnerable Road User (VRU) Active Safety , 2013, Traffic injury prevention.

[5]  Robert Anderson,et al.  Issues and challenges for pedestrian active safety systems based on real world accidents. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Fabian Schuldt,et al.  Defining and Substantiating the Terms Scene, Situation, and Scenario for Automated Driving , 2015, 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  Peter Vortisch,et al.  Microscopic Traffic Flow Simulator VISSIM , 2010 .

[8]  J M Wille,et al.  rateEFFECT - Effectiveness evaluation of active safety systems , 2013 .

[9]  Martin Fränzle,et al.  A comprehensive and harmonized method for assessing the effectiveness of advanced driver assistance systems by virtual simulation: The P.E.A.R.S , 2015 .

[10]  Julius Ziegler,et al.  Lanelets: Efficient map representation for autonomous driving , 2014, 2014 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings.

[11]  C Erbsmehl,et al.  Standardized pre-crash-scenarios in digital format on the basis of the VUFO simulation , 2013 .

[12]  Andreas Eidehall,et al.  Benefit estimation model for pedestrian auto brake functionality , 2010 .

[13]  Nidhi Kalra,et al.  The Enemy of Good , 2017 .

[14]  Thomas F. Fugger,et al.  Pedestrian Behavior at Signal-Controlled Crosswalks , 2001 .

[15]  David R. Large,et al.  IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ACTIVE SAFETY SYSTEMS TO SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE ACCIDENTS WITH VULNERABLE ROAD USERS , 2019 .

[16]  Thomas Nguyen That,et al.  Toward a standard: RoadXML, the road network database format , 2010 .

[17]  Helbing,et al.  Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[18]  Ulrich Sander,et al.  Pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Paolo Scognamiglio,et al.  Toward harmonizing prospective effectiveness assessment for road safety: Comparing tools in standard test case simulations , 2019, Traffic injury prevention.

[20]  Hanna Jeppsson,et al.  Real life safety benefits of increasing brake deceleration in car-to-pedestrian accidents: Simulation of Vacuum Emergency Braking. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Joerg Bakker,et al.  The Eclipse working group openPASS: an open source approach to safety impact assessment via simulation , 2017 .

[22]  Gordon D. B. Cameron,et al.  PARAMICS—Parallel microscopic simulation of road traffic , 1996, The Journal of Supercomputing.

[23]  Hermann Steffan,et al.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of Volvo‘s pedestrian detection system based on selected real-life fatal pedestrian accidents , 2016 .

[24]  Jordanka Kovaceva,et al.  Safety benefit assessment of autonomous emergency braking and steering systems for the protection of cyclists and pedestrians based on a combination of computer simulation and real-world test results. , 2020, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  George Yannis,et al.  Pedestrian gap acceptance for mid-block street crossing , 2013 .

[26]  Lei Wang,et al.  Multi-functional open-source simulation platform for development and functional validation of ADAS and automated driving , 2018 .

[27]  Germán Ros,et al.  CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulator , 2017, CoRL.

[28]  Thomas Robert,et al.  Observations on pedestrian pre-crash reactions during simulated accidents. , 2013, Stapp car crash journal.

[29]  Kip Smith,et al.  Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  Ernst Tomasch,et al.  The Effect of P-AEB System Parameters on the Effectiveness for Real World Pedestrian Accidents , 2019 .

[31]  Richard W. Bohannon Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. , 1997, Age and ageing.

[32]  Lotta Jakobsson,et al.  Pedestrians interacting with a passenger car; A study of real world accidents , 2011 .

[33]  Dariu Gavrila,et al.  Context-Based Pedestrian Path Prediction , 2014, ECCV.

[34]  Philippe Nitsche,et al.  A novel, modular validation framework for collision avoidance of automated vehicles at road junctions , 2018, 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[35]  Martin Strobl,et al.  OpenDRIVE 2010 and Beyond -Status and future of the de facto standard for the description of road networks , 2010 .

[36]  Mervyn Edwards,et al.  European project AsPeCSS - interim result: development of test scenarios based on identified accident scenarios , 2013 .

[37]  Shengwu Xiong,et al.  Pedestrian Crossing Speed Patterns and running frequency analysis at a non-signalized marked crosswalk: Quantitative and qualitative approaches , 2017 .

[38]  Yi Wen,et al.  Injured probability assessment in frontal pedestrian-vehicle collision counting uncertainties in pedestrian movement , 2018, Safety Science.

[39]  Markus Maurer,et al.  Scenarios for Development, Test and Validation of Automated Vehicles , 2018, 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[40]  Wolfgang Hirschberg,et al.  Tire model TMeasy , 2007 .