Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC): Chronic care model — Information for chronic disease management

During the last decade, many countries have been reorient their health systems in order to progressively include integrated management of chronic disease, where diabetes mellitus (DM) is also included. The Chronic Care Model (CCM) has often been the theoretical framework supporting the action accordingly and the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) the most used instrument in measuring their level of implementation. Thus, the present study aims to contribute to improving information systems and clinical decision support in the management of diabetes as a Chronic Disease. Also aimed to make the translation and validation of the ACIC 3.5 and assess what level CCM is applied. The ACIC was applied to 175 doctors and nurses in primary care, belonging to a group of health centers. We defined the level of significance of 5%. In terms of results, it is observed that the ACIC Version 3.5 achieved a Cronbach's alpha of 0.958, indicating a high reliability and a coefficient of Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin of 0.918, demonstrating that our data show excellent suitability for factor analysis. The group of health centers studied only guarantees a basic support to people with diabetes. In terms of applicability of the results of the CCM used in the care provision of the diabetic person and the family, let predict a long journey to make in this area.

[1]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC): a practical tool to measure quality improvement. , 2002, Health services research.

[2]  P. Bazeley,et al.  What distinguishes clinicians who better support patients for chronic disease self-management? , 2012, Australian journal of primary health.

[3]  Assessment of Chronic Illness Care with the German version of the ACIC in different primary care settings in Switzerland , 2010, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[4]  Melanie J. Cowan,et al.  Noncommunicable diseases country profiles 2011. , 2011 .

[5]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[6]  G. Andrews,et al.  The potential of public health to enhance chronic disease management. , 2005, Public health.

[7]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Recommendations for the Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the DASH & QuickDASH Outcome Measures , 2007 .

[8]  Pedro Lopes Ferreira,et al.  Avaliação psicométrica e adaptação cultural e linguística de instrumentos de medição em saúde: princípios metodológicos gerais , 1998 .

[9]  J. Car,et al.  Systematic review of the methodological quality of clinical guideline development for the management of chronic disease in Europe. , 2012, Health policy.

[10]  T. Payne Computer decision support systems. , 2000, Chest.

[11]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. , 2000, Spine.

[12]  J. Marôco,et al.  Qual a fiabilidade do alfa de Cronbach? Questões antigas e soluções modernas? , 2013 .

[13]  Reinhard Busse,et al.  Tackling Chronic Disease in Europe: Strategies, Interventions and Challenges , 2010 .

[14]  R. Brislin Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research , 1970 .

[15]  Howard Rosenbaum,et al.  Effects of reading proficiency on embedded stem priming in primary school children , 2021 .

[16]  Brian T. Austin,et al.  Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. , 2001, Health affairs.

[17]  R. Osborne,et al.  A systematic review of outcomes of chronic disease self-management interventions , 2013, Quality of Life Research.

[18]  J. Cramm,et al.  Development and validation of a short version of the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) in Dutch Disease Management Programs , 2011, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[19]  G. Verbeke,et al.  Effectiveness of the introduction of a Chronic Care Model-based program for type 2 diabetes in Belgium , 2010, BMC health services research.