Magnitude Modelling of HRTF Using Principal Component Analysis Applied to Complex Values

Principal components analysis (PCA) is frequently used for modelling the magnitude of the headrelated transfer functions (HRTFs). Assuming that the HRTFs are minimum phase systems, the phase is obtained from the Hilbert transform of the log-magnitude. In recent years, the PCA applied to HRTFs is also used to model individual HRTFs relating the PCA weights with anthropometric measurements of the head, torso and pinnae. The HRTF log-magnitude is the most used format of input data to the PCA, but it has been shown that if the input data is HRTF linear magnitude, the cumulative variance converges faster, and the mean square error (MSE) is smaller. This study demonstrates that PCA applied directly on HRTF complex values is even better than the two formats mentioned above, that is, the MSE is the smallest and the cumulative variance converges faster after the 8th principal component. Different objective experiments around all the median plane put in evidence the differences which, although small, seem to be perceptually detectable. To elucidate this point, psychoacoustic discrimination tests are done between measured and reconstructed HRTFs from the three types of input data mentioned, in the median plane between −45◦ and +90◦.

[1]  Dadang Gunawan,et al.  The Effectiveness of Chosen Partial Anthropometric Measurements in Individualizing Head-Related Transfer Functions on Median Plane , 2011 .

[2]  H. Colburn,et al.  Sensitivity of human subjects to head-related transfer-function phase spectra. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Abhijit Kulkarni,et al.  Infinite-impulse-response models of the head-related transfer function. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Brian F. G. Katz,et al.  Variability in Perceptual Evaluation of HRTFs , 2010 .

[5]  J. Blauert Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization , 1983 .

[6]  J. Sodnik,et al.  Principal components of non-individualized head related transfer functions significant for azimuth perception , 2006 .

[7]  Dadang Gunawan,et al.  Enhanced Individualization of Head-Related Impulse Response Model in Horizontal Plane Based on Multiple Regression Analysis , 2010, 2010 Second International Conference on Computer Engineering and Applications.

[8]  Shu-Nung Yao,et al.  HRTF Adjustments with Audio Quality Assessments , 2013 .

[9]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Identification of Anthropometric Measurements for Individualization of Head-Related Transfer Functions , 2009 .

[10]  V. Mellert,et al.  Transformation characteristics of the external human ear. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Zhenyang Wu,et al.  HRTF personalization based on artificial neural network in individual virtual auditory space , 2008 .

[12]  Dadang Gunawan,et al.  Effective Preprocessing in Modeling Head-Related Impulse Responses Based on Principal Components Analysis , 2010 .

[13]  Jeroen Breebaart,et al.  Effect of perceptually irrelevant variance in head-related transfer functions on principal component analysis. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.  Discrete-Time Signal Pro-cessing , 1989 .

[15]  F. Wightman,et al.  A model of head-related transfer functions based on principal components analysis and minimum-phase reconstruction. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  C. Avendano,et al.  The CIPIC HRTF database , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Workshop on the Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (Cat. No.01TH8575).

[17]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Individualization of Head-Related Transfer Function for Three-Dimensional Virtual Auditory Display: A Review , 2007, HCI.

[18]  R. A. Kennedy,et al.  Statistical method to identify key anthropometric parameters in hrtf individualization , 2011, 2011 Joint Workshop on Hands-free Speech Communication and Microphone Arrays.

[19]  F L Wightman,et al.  Headphone simulation of free-field listening. II: Psychophysical validation. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.