Evaluation in academic discourse: Managing criticism in Japanese and English book reviews

Abstract Evaluative language features prominently in academic discourse, especially in book reviews. Previous studies have suggested that the use of criticism and its mitigation devices may be culturally bound. However, so far, there has been no study which explicitly compares the use of criticism in Japanese and English book reviews. This paper investigates how criticism is managed in English and Japanese book reviews. An analysis of a corpus of twenty English and twenty Japanese book reviews in the field of linguistics shows that while there are similarities, there are distinctive differences. At the global level, praise is more prominently used in English book reviews to establish solidarity and rapport while apology and self-denigration are used in Japanese reviews. At the local level, ‘rhetorical questions’, ‘self-denigration’, ‘recasting problems as potential for future research’ and ‘attributing problems to the next generation’ are used only in Japanese reviews. The study explores the importance of taking into account both ethnic culture and small cultures in interpreting empirical data from two languages.

[1]  Kenneth C. C Kong.  Linguistic resources as evaluators in English and Chinese research articles , 2006 .

[2]  J P Vandenbroucke,et al.  Alternative Medicine: A Mirror Image for Scientific Reasoning in Conventional Medicine , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  Jacob L. Mey,et al.  Between culture and pragmatics: Scylla and Charybdis? The precarious condition of intercultural pragmatics , 2004 .

[4]  M. Hyde,et al.  Intercultural communication : an advanced resource book , 2004 .

[5]  Ron Scollon,et al.  Topic confusion in English-Asian discourse , 1991 .

[6]  G. Hofstede.  Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[7]  Masako K. Hiraga,et al.  Differing perceptions of face in British and Japanese academic settings , 1996 .

[8]  J. Holmes.  Apologies in New Zealand English , 1990, Language in Society.

[9]  D. Roen,et al.  Complimenting and involvement in peer reviews: Gender variation , 1992, Language in Society.

[10]  A. Sniderman.  Clinical trials, consensus conferences, and clinical practice , 1999, The Lancet.

[11]  Criticisms in English and Japanese in Academic Writing , 2009 .

[12]  Rodney H. Jones,et al.  Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach , 1994 .

[13]  K. Turner,et al.  Language in Life, and a Life in Language: Jacob Mey, a Festschrift , 2009 .

[14]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[15]  Maurizio Gotti,et al.  Intercultural aspects of specialized communication , 2004 .

[16]  Geoffrey Leech,et al.  Politeness: Is there an East-West divide? , 2007 .

[17]  Michael Haugh.  Emic conceptualisations of (im)politeness and face in Japanese: Implications for the discursive negotiation of second language learner identities , 2007 .

[18]  Ulla Connor,et al.  Intercultural Rhetoric Research: Beyond Texts. , 2004 .

[19]  Kenneth R. Rose,et al.  American English, Japanese, and Directness: More Than Stereotypes 1 , 1996 .

[20]  Donna M. Johnson.  Compliments and Politeness in Peer-review Texts , 1992 .

[21]  K. Hyland,et al.  Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing , 2001 .

[22]  Complimenting others: the case of English-written medical books reviews , 2009 .

[23]  Greg Myers,et al.  The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles , 1989 .

[24]  A. Holliday.  The role of culture in English language education: key challenges , 2009 .

[25]  U. Connor,et al.  Tertium Comparationis: A vital component in contrastive research methodology , 2005 .

[26]  Philip Shaw.  How do we recognise implicit evaluation in academic book reviews , 2004 .

[27]  Jeannett Martin.  Introduction, special issue on Appraisal , 2003 .

[28]  Hiroko Tanaka,et al.  Turn-taking in Japanese conversation : a study in grammar and interaction , 2000 .

[29]  J. Hagge,et al.  Linguistic Politeness in Professional Prose , 1989 .

[30]  Maryelis Pabón Berbesí,et al.  Collegiality, critique and the construction of scientific argumentation in medical book reviews: A diachronic approach , 2007 .

[31]  Y. Matsumoto.  Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese , 1988 .

[32]  R. Ide.  'Sorry for your kindness' : Japanese interactional ritual in public discourse , 1998 .

[33]  R. Cherry.  Politeness in written persuasion , 1988 .