Aerodynamic Performance of a Gliding Swallowtail Butterfly Wing Model

In the present study, we perform a wind-tunnel experiment to investigate the aerodynamic performance of a gliding swallowtail-butterfly wing model having a low aspect ratio. The drag, lift and pitching moment are directly measured using a 6-axis force/torque sensor. The lift coefficient increases rapidly at attack angles less than 10° and then slowly at larger attack angles. The lift coefficient does not fall off rapidly even at quite high angles of attack, showing the characteristics of low-aspect-ratio wings. On the other hand, the drag coefficient increases more rapidly at higher angles of attack due to the increase in the effective area responsible for the drag. The maximum lift-to-drag ratio of the present modeled swallowtail butterfly wing is larger than those of wings of fruitfly and bumblebee, and even comparable to those of wings of birds such as the petrel and starling. From the measurement of pitching moment, we show that the modeled swallowtail butterfly wing has a longitudinal static stability. Flow visualization shows that the flow separated from the leading edge reattaches on the wing surface at α < 15°, forming a small separation bubble, and full separation occurs at α ≥ 15°. On the other hand, strong wing-tip vortices are observed in the wake at α ≥ 5° and they are an important source of the lift as well as the main reason for broad stall. Finally, in the absence of long hind-wing tails, the lift and longitudinal static stability are reduced, indicating that the hind-wing tails play an important role in enhancing the aerodynamic performance.

[1]  Andrei K. Brodsky The Evolution of Insect Flight , 1997 .

[2]  R. Wootton Leading edge section and asymmetric twisting in the wings of flying butterflies (Insecta, Papilionoidea) , 1993 .

[3]  William H. Rae,et al.  Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing , 1966 .

[4]  J. Graham,et al.  Flow Around Circular Cylinders. Vol. 2: Applications , 2003 .

[5]  R. Dudley The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution , 1999 .

[6]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Leading-edge vortices in insect flight , 1996, Nature.

[7]  W. Rodi,et al.  Ensemble-averaged measurements in the turbulent near wake of two side-by-side square cylinders , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  R. B. Srygley,et al.  Unconventional lift-generating mechanisms in free-flying butterflies , 2002, Nature.

[9]  S. Vogel Flight in Drosophila , 1967 .

[10]  Sangmo Kang Characteristics of flow over two circular cylinders in a side-by-side arrangement at low Reynolds numbers , 2003 .

[11]  S. Vogel Flight in Drosophila : III. Aerodynamic Characteristics of Fly Wing Sand Wing Models , 1967 .

[12]  G. Tudor,et al.  Butterflies of the East Coast: An Observer's Guide , 2005 .

[13]  G. Taylor,et al.  Animal flight dynamics I. Stability in gliding flight. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  P. Withers An Aerodynamic Analysis of Bird Wings as Fixed Aerofoils , 1981 .

[15]  J. Wakeling,et al.  Dragonfly flight. I. Gliding flight and steady-state aerodynamic forces. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  R. H. Buckholz,et al.  The Functional Role of Wing Corrugations in Living Systems , 1986 .

[17]  M. Jensen Biology and physics of locust flight. III. The aerodynamics of locust flight , 1956, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[18]  David L. Gibo,et al.  Soaring flight of monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Danaidae), during the late summer migration in southern Ontario , 1979 .

[19]  A. Brodsky Vortex Formation in the Tethered Flight of the Peacock Butterfly Inachis io L. (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) and some Aspects of Insect Flight Evolution , 1991 .

[20]  J. Brackenbury Insects in Flight , 1992 .

[21]  R. Wootton,et al.  WING SHAPE AND FLIGHT BEHAVIOUR IN BUTTERFLIES (LEPIDOPTERA: PAPILIONOIDEA AND HESPERIOIDEA): A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS , 1988 .

[22]  S. Hoerner Fluid-Dynamic Lift , 1985 .

[23]  P. Aerts,et al.  Does flight morphology relate to flight performance? An experimental test with the butterfly **Pararge aegeria** , 2002 .

[24]  S. Vogel,et al.  Life in Moving Fluids , 2020 .

[25]  R. Dudley,et al.  Mechanics of Forward Flight in Bumblebees: II. QUASI-STEADY LIFT AND POWER REQUIREMENTS , 1990 .

[26]  Thomas J. Mueller,et al.  Aerodynamic Characteristics of Low Aspect Ratio Wings at Low Reynolds Numbers , 2001 .

[27]  T. Mueller,et al.  AERODYNAMICS OF SMALL VEHICLES , 2003 .

[28]  Yu Zhou,et al.  The turbulent wake of two side-by-side circular cylinders , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[29]  C. Ellington,et al.  The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. II. Aerodynamic consequences of kinematic and morphological variation. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[30]  Thomas J. Mueller,et al.  Fixed and Flapping Wing Aerodynamics for Micro Air Vehicle Applications , 2001 .

[31]  C. Williamson Evolution of a single wake behind a pair of bluff bodies , 1985, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[32]  W. Shyy,et al.  Aerodynamics of Low Reynolds Number Flyers , 2007 .

[33]  Yongsheng Lian,et al.  Three-Dimensional Fluid-Structure Interactions of a Membrane Wing for Micro Air Vehicle Applications , 2003 .

[34]  M. P. Païdoussis,et al.  FLUID BEHAVIOUR OF SIDE-BY-SIDE CIRCULAR CYLINDERS IN STEADY CROSS-FLOW , 1999 .