Talker and Contextual Effects On Identifying Fragmented Mandarin Tones

This study investigated identification of fragmented Mandarin tones produced by single versus multiple speakers. Six minimal pairs, including all six Mandarin tonal contrasts, were digitally processed to generate intact, silent-center, centeronly, and onset-only syllables. The syllables were produced either in isolation or with a carrier phrase qing3 shuo3 __ (“Please say __”). The stimuli were presented in four blocks: (1) single speaker, isolated syllables; (2) single speaker, syllables with the carrier; (3) multiple speakers, isolated syllables; and (4) multiple speakers, syllables with the carrier. Forty native listeners and 55 non-native listeners were put under time pressure to identify the tones of the syllables and both response accuracy and reaction time were measured. Overall, the results showed higher accuracy for the single-speaker stimuli and when the syllables were presented with the carrier. For the native listeners, context facilitated identification of multiple-speaker stimuli more than single-speaker stimuli. For the non-native listeners, in contrast, context did not interact with the speaker effect. Identification of Tone 4 was consistently most accurate and least compromised by acoustic modification among the four tones. The results indicate different processing strategies for native and non-native listeners when dealing with incomplete acoustic input.

[1]  Matthias J. Sjerps,et al.  Speaker Normalization in Speech Perception , 2008, The Handbook of Speech Perception.

[2]  Núria Sebastián-Gallés,et al.  Cross‐Language Speech Perception , 2008 .

[3]  Y Xu,et al.  Production and perception of coarticulated tones. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Liang Tao,et al.  Identification of acoustically modified Mandarin tones by native listeners , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[5]  Corinne B. Moore,et al.  Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese tones. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Steven H. Weinberger,et al.  Interlanguage phonology : the acquisition of a second language sound system , 1987 .

[8]  J. Leather,et al.  Speaker normalization in perception of lexical tone , 1983 .

[9]  A. Jongman,et al.  Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  W. Ganong Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Information Conveyed by Vowels , 1957 .

[12]  D. Pisoni,et al.  The Handbook of Speech Perception , 2004 .

[13]  C M Connine,et al.  Effects of Lexical Stress on Phonetic Categorization , 1987, Phonetica.

[14]  T. Gottfried,et al.  Effect of linguistic experience on the identification of Mandarin Chinese vowels and tones , 1997 .

[15]  Patrick C M Wong,et al.  Perceptual normalization for inter- and intratalker variation in Cantonese level tones. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[16]  Chao-Yang Lee,et al.  Identification of Acoustically Modified Mandarin Tones by Non-native Listeners , 2010 .

[17]  J. McQueen The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: stimulus quality in word-final ambiguity. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.