Limiting factors of the response time of the magnetorheological damper

Magnetorheological dampers seem to be suitable for the adaptive car suspension systems. For proper operation of the semi-active algorithms (skyhook, groundhook), the force response of the damper must be fast enough. In this paper, the response time of the Delphi vehicle MR damper is examined and the sources of the overall force time response on the control voltage are discussed. One of the main sources of the response time seems to be electro-magnetic circuit of the MR damper. A principle of an optimal controller for reducing response of the coil's current on the control voltage is designed. However, the measured overall force time response with fast current controller was not reduced as expected. Therefore, a FEM simulation of the magnetic circuit was made. It shows that after an optimization of the current controller, eddy currents in the coil's core cause long time response and therefore they are the limiting factor of the response time of the MR damper. These simulations were verified by the measurements and some recommendations about improving the pistons construction are given at the end.

[1]  Dean Karnopp,et al.  Vibration Control Using Semi-Active Force Generators , 1974 .

[2]  Waleed Fekry Faris,et al.  Analysis of Semi‐Active and Passive Suspensions System for Off‐Road Vehicles , 2009 .

[3]  Longlei Dong,et al.  Magnetic circuit FEM analysis and optimum design for MR damper , 2010 .

[4]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Dynamic Modeling of Large-Scale Magnetorheological Damper Systems for Civil Engineering Applications , 2004 .

[5]  Myeong-Kwan Park,et al.  Electromagnetic design for performance improvement of an MR valve , 2012 .

[6]  Seung-Bok Choi,et al.  Vibration control of an MR vehicle suspension system considering both hysteretic behavior and parameter variation , 2009 .

[7]  Keum-Shik Hong,et al.  Skyhook control using a full-vehicle model and four Relative Displacement Sensors , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems.

[8]  O. Sename,et al.  Survey and performance evaluation on some automotive semi-active suspension control methods: A comparative study on a single-corner model , 2012, Annu. Rev. Control..

[9]  Mehdi Ahmadian,et al.  Investigating the magnetorheological effect at high flow velocities , 2006 .

[10]  G. Temple Static and Dynamic Electricity , 1940, Nature.

[11]  Mehdi Ahmadian,et al.  An experimental analysis of suitability of various semiactive control methods for magneto-rheological vehicle suspensions , 2005, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[12]  J. Maas,et al.  Experimental Investigation of the Transient Behavior of MR Fluids , 2011 .

[13]  Xiaohua Zhu,et al.  Design and performance analysis of a magnetorheological fluid damper for drillstring , 2012 .

[14]  V. Pavlínek,et al.  THE ROLE OF PARTICLES ANNEALING TEMPERATURE ON MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL EFFECT , 2011 .

[15]  Michael J. Brennan,et al.  A comparison of semi-active damping control strategies for vibration isolation of harmonic disturbances , 2005 .

[16]  Jeong-Hoi Koo,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of the response time of MR dampers , 2006 .