Role of Sectoral Transformation in the Evolution of Water Management Norms in Agricultural Catchments: A Sociohydrologic Modeling Analysis

This study is focused on the water‐agriculture‐environment nexus as it played out in the Murrumbidgee River Basin, eastern Australia, and how coevolution of society and water management actually transpired. Over 100 years of agricultural development the Murrumbidgee Basin experienced a “pendulum swing” in terms of water allocation, initially exclusively for agriculture production changing over to reallocation back to the environment. In this paper, we hypothesize that in the competition for water between economic livelihood and environmental wellbeing, economic diversification was the key to swinging community sentiment in favor of environmental protection, and triggering policy action that resulted in more water allocation to the environment. To test this hypothesis, we developed a sociohydrology model to link the dynamics of the whole economy (both agriculture and industry composed of manufacturing and services) to the community's sensitivity toward the environment. Changing community sensitivity influenced how water was allocated and governed and how the agricultural sector grew relative to the industrial sector (composed of manufacturing and services sectors). In this way, we show that economic diversification played a key role in influencing the community's values and preferences with respect to the environment and economic growth. Without diversification, model simulations show that the community would not have been sufficiently sensitive and willing enough to act to restore the environment, highlighting the key role of sectoral transformation in achieving the goal of sustainable agricultural development.

[1]  P. Douglas,et al.  A theory of production , 1928 .

[2]  M. Stone Cross‐Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions , 1976 .

[3]  Aroop K. Mahanty,et al.  THEORY OF PRODUCTION , 1980 .

[4]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[5]  D. Pannell Dryland salinity: economic, scientific, social and policy dimensions , 2001 .

[6]  Elisabetta Magnani,et al.  The Environmental Kuznets Curve: development path or policy result? , 2001, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  D. Gollin Getting Income Shares Right , 2002, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  C. Pissarides,et al.  Structural Change in a Multi-Sector Model of Growth , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[9]  Rajinder Singh,et al.  Farming Systems in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area of NSW: An Economic Analysis , 2005 .

[10]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[11]  S. Guner United Nations World Water Assessment Programme , 2011 .

[12]  R. Kreutzwiser,et al.  Sharing Water with Nature: Insights on Environmental Water Allocation from a Case Study of the Murrumbidgee Catchment, Australia , 2011 .

[13]  Robert Clewley,et al.  Hybrid Models and Biological Model Reduction with PyDSTool , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[14]  E. O’Gorman Growing rice on the Murrumbidgee River: cultures, politics, and practices of food production and water use, 1900 to 2012 , 2013 .

[15]  Lutz Breuer,et al.  Monte Carlo-based calibration and uncertainty analysis of a coupled plant growth and hydrological model , 2013 .

[16]  G. Di Baldassarre,et al.  Towards understanding the dynamic behaviour of floodplains as human-water systems , 2013 .

[17]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Socio-hydrologic perspectives of the co-evolution of humans and water in the Tarim River basin, Western China: the Taiji-Tire model , 2013 .

[18]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Socio-hydrologic drivers of the pendulum swing between agricultural development and environmental health: a case study from Murrumbidgee River basin, Australia , 2014 .

[19]  Sujan Koirala,et al.  Illustrating a new global-scale approach to estimating potential reduction in fish species richness due to flow alteration , 2014 .

[20]  N. Crossman,et al.  Water allocation reform to meet environmental uses while sustaining irrigation: a case study of the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia , 2014 .

[21]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Socio-hydrologic modeling to understand and mediate the competition for water between agriculture development and environmental health : Murrumbidgee River Basin, Australia , 2014 .

[22]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  A prototype framework for models of socio-hydrology: identification of key feedback loops and parameterisation approach , 2014 .

[23]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Time scale interactions and the coevolution of humans and water , 2015 .

[24]  Janaine Z. Coletti,et al.  A model of the socio‐hydrologic dynamics in a semiarid catchment: Isolating feedbacks in the coupled human‐hydrology system , 2015 .

[25]  Tom P. Evans,et al.  Debates—Perspectives on socio‐hydrology: Socio‐hydrologic modeling: Tradeoffs, hypothesis testing, and validation , 2015 .

[26]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  From channelization to restoration: Sociohydrologic modeling with changing community preferences in the Kissimmee River Basin, Florida , 2016 .

[27]  Andrew W. Western,et al.  Evolution of the societal value of water resources for economic development versus environmental sustainability in Australia from 1843 to 2011 , 2017 .

[28]  Venkatesh Merwade,et al.  Incorporating institutions and collective action into a sociohydrological model of flood resilience , 2017 .

[29]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Progress in socio‐hydrology: a meta‐analysis of challenges and opportunities , 2017 .

[30]  S. Vigneswaran,et al.  Allocating Environmental Water and Impact on Basin Unemployment: Role of A Diversified Economy , 2017 .