The Japanese guideline for cervical cancer screening.

Cervical cancer is the 11th leading cause of death from cancer for females in Japan. In 2005, there were 2486 deaths from cervical cancer, accounting for 1.8% of the total number of cancer deaths in Japan. Cervical cancer screening using conventional cytology has been conducted worldwide. The guideline for cervical cancer screening was developed based on the established method. The efficacies of conventional and liquid-based cytology, human papillomavirus testing alone and two combination methods were evaluated. On the basis of the balance of the benefits and harms, recommendations for population-based and opportunistic screening were formulated. Five methods of cervical cancer screening were evaluated. On the basis of the analytic framework involving key questions, 3450 articles published from January 1985 to October 2007 were selected using MEDLINE and other methods. After the systematic literature review, 66 articles were confirmed. The results of 33 studies were consistent, and the evidence was sufficient to evaluate the effect of conventional cytology screening. The accuracy of liquid-based cytology was almost equal to that of conventional cytology. Although human papillomavirus testing and combination methods showed high sensitivity, no study has evaluated the reduction in mortality from cervical cancer. Except for the possibility of overdiagnosis, no serious adverse effects of cervical cancer screening were found. Cervical cancer screening using conventional and liquid-based cytology is recommended for population-based and opportunistic screening due to sufficient evidence. Cervical cancer screening using either human papillomavirus testing alone or two combination methods is not recommended for population-based screening due to insufficient evidence.

[1]  C. Trimble,et al.  New technologies for cervical cancer screening. , 2012, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[2]  N. Segnan,et al.  European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Second Edition—Summary Document , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[3]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Effectiveness of cervical screening with age: population based case-control study of prospectively recorded data , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  K. Lakshmaiah,et al.  HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Henry C Kitchener,et al.  HPV testing in combination with liquid-based cytology in primary cervical screening (ARTISTIC): a randomised controlled trial. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  H. Yoshikawa,et al.  Human papillomavirus infections among Japanese women: age‐related prevalence and type‐specific risk for cervical cancer , 2009, Cancer science.

[7]  A. Miller,et al.  Defining a strategy to evaluate cervical cancer prevention and early detection in the era of HPV vaccination. , 2009, Preventive medicine.

[8]  J. Dillner,et al.  Efficacy of HPV DNA testing with cytology triage and/or repeat HPV DNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening. , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  P. van Damme,et al.  Country recommendations on the inclusion of HPV vaccines in national immunization programmes among high-income countries, June 2006-January 2008. , 2008, Vaccine.

[10]  Habbema Jd,et al.  Insufficient basis for the inclusion of Human papillomavirus vaccination in the National Immunisation Programme in The Netherlands , 2008 .

[11]  O. Leo,et al.  Immune response to human papillomavirus after prophylactic vaccination with AS04-adjuvanted HPV-16/18 vaccine: improving upon nature. , 2008, Gynecologic oncology.

[12]  A. Schuchat,et al.  Early experience with human papillomavirus vaccine introduction in the United States, Canada and Australia. , 2008, Vaccine.

[13]  S. Garland,et al.  Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer in Australasia and Oceania: risk-factors, epidemiology and prevention. , 2008, Vaccine.

[14]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Long‐term follow‐up of cervical abnormalities among women screened by HPV testing and cytology—Results from the Hammersmith study , 2008, International journal of cancer.

[15]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Results at recruitment from a randomized controlled trial comparing human papillomavirus testing alone with conventional cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  C. Hamashima,et al.  The standardized development method of the Japanese guidelines for cancer screening. , 2008, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[17]  M. Hakama,et al.  Screening with a primary human papillomavirus test does not increase detection of cervical cancer and intraepithelial neoplasia 3. , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[18]  D. Roder,et al.  A case–control study of the protective benefit of cervical screening against invasive cervical cancer in NSW women , 2008, Cancer Causes & Control.

[19]  L. Elit,et al.  Human papillomavirus DNA versus papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  M. van der Aa,et al.  Mass screening programmes and trends in cervical cancer in Finland and the Netherlands , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[21]  J. Berkhof,et al.  Human papillomavirus DNA testing for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer: 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled implementation trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[22]  Stephen D Walter,et al.  Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  J. Dillner,et al.  Human Papillomavirus and Papanicolaou Tests to Screen for Cervical Cancer , 2008 .

[24]  Diane Solomon,et al.  2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. , 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  A. Herbert,et al.  European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for cervical cytology terminology , 2007, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[26]  J. Berkhof,et al.  Risk of high‐grade cervical intra‐epithelial neoplasia based on cytology and high‐risk HPV testing at baseline and at 6‐months , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[27]  M. Lehtinen,et al.  Induction of immune memory following administration of a prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6/11/16/18 L1 virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine. , 2007, Vaccine.

[28]  M. Cruickshank,et al.  Precancerous changes in the cervix and risk of subsequent preterm birth , 2007, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[29]  K. Frederiksen,et al.  Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and the subsequent risk of preterm delivery , 2007, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[30]  I. Vistad,et al.  Pregnancy outcome after cervical cone excision: a case‐control study , 2007, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[31]  J. Green,et al.  Comparison of risk factors for invasive squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix: Collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 8,097 women with squamous cell carcinoma and 1,374 women with adenocarcinoma from 12 epidemiological studies , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[32]  M. Gissler,et al.  Preterm Delivery After Surgical Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[33]  M. Hakama,et al.  Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial , 2006, BMC public health.

[34]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[35]  T. Miki,et al.  Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening over cervical cancer mortality among Japanese women. , 2006, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[36]  Martial Guillaud,et al.  DNA ploidy compared with human papilloma virus testing (Hybrid Capture II) and conventional cervical cytology as a primary screening test for cervical high‐grade lesions and cancer in 1555 patients with biopsy confirmation , 2006, Cancer.

[37]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Human papillomavirus testing and liquid-based cytology in primary screening of women younger than 35 years: results at recruitment for a randomised controlled trial. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[38]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Human papillomavirus testing and liquid-based cytology: results at recruitment from the new technologies for cervical cancer randomized controlled trial. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[39]  M. Ziol,et al.  Cost‐effectiveness of liquid‐based cytology with or without hybrid‐capture II HPV test compared with conventional Pap smears: A study by the French society of clinical cytology , 2005, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[40]  H. Sigvaldason,et al.  Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in Iceland, 1964–2002: a study on trends in incidence and mortality and the effect of risk factors , 2006, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[41]  Thomas C Wright,et al.  Direct comparison of liquid‐based and conventional cytology in a South African screening trial , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[42]  H. Kitchener,et al.  A report on the current status of European research on the use of human papillomavirus testing for primary cervical cancer screening , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[43]  M Arbyn,et al.  Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2006, The Lancet.

[44]  D. Parkin,et al.  A cluster randomized controlled trial of visual, cytology and human papillomavirus screening for cancer of the cervix in rural India , 2005, International journal of cancer.

[45]  A. Oshima,et al.  Influence of age on cervical cancer survival in Japan. , 2005, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[46]  R. Zanetti,et al.  Impact of the introduction of organised screening for cervical cancer in Turin, Italy: cancer incidence by screening history 1992–98 , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[47]  A. Gavin,et al.  Recent trends in cervical cancer mortality in Britain and Ireland: the case for population-based cervical cancer screening , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[48]  D. Seigneurin,et al.  Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening of cervical neoplasia: Results from a multicenter study in India , 2004, International journal of cancer.

[49]  J. T. Cox,et al.  Interim Guidance for the Use of Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing as an Adjunct to Cervical Cytology for Screening , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[50]  U. P. S. T. Force,et al.  Screening for cervical cancer: recommendations and rationale. , 2003, American family physician.

[51]  R. Verheijen,et al.  Incidence and survival rate of women with cervical cancer in the Greater Amsterdam area , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[52]  D. Sherer,et al.  Performance of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative survey. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.

[53]  S. Feig IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention , 2003 .

[54]  A. Moscicki,et al.  American Cancer Society Guideline for the Early Detection of Cervical Neoplasia and Cancer , 2002, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[55]  Y. Qiao,et al.  Primary Screening with Liquid-Based Cytology in an Unscreened Population in Rural China, with an Emphasis on Reprocessing Unsatisfactory Samples , 2002, Acta Cytologica.

[56]  R. Taylor,et al.  NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EXCELLENCE (NICE) , 2002, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[57]  Gynecologists ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 32, November 2001 (replaces Technical Bulletin Number 181, June 1993, and Committee Opinion Number 241, September 2000). Thyroid disease in pregnancy. , 2001, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[58]  Y. Nishino,et al.  Evaluating the Accuracy of Uterine Cancer Screening with the Regional Cancer Registration System , 2001, Acta Cytologica.

[59]  Johannes Haerting,et al.  Screening for high‐grade cervical intra‐epithelial neoplasia and cancer by testing for high‐risk HPV, routine cytology or colposcopy , 2000, International journal of cancer.

[60]  M. Hakama,et al.  Effect of organised screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Finland, 1963–1995: Recent increase in cervical cancer incidence , 1999, International journal of cancer.

[61]  M. Jiménez-Pérez,et al.  Has the use of pap smears reduced the risk of invasive cervical cancer in Guadalajara, Mexico? , 1999, International journal of cancer.

[62]  T. Waldhoer,et al.  Prevalence of self-reported cervical cancer screening and impact on cervical cancer mortality in Austria. , 1999, Wiener klinische Wochenschrift.

[63]  A. Miller,et al.  Natural history of dysplasia of the uterine cervix. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[64]  J. Daling,et al.  Effect of cervical carcinoma in situ and its management on pregnancy outcome. , 1999, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[65]  P. A. de Ruíz,et al.  Evaluation of the cervical cancer screening programme in Mexico: a population-based case-control study. , 1998, International journal of epidemiology.

[66]  G. Matsunaga,et al.  Mass Screening for Cancer of the Uterine Cervix in Miyagi Prefecture, Japan , 1998, Acta Cytologica.

[67]  S. Sato,et al.  Cervical cancer screening in Japan. A case-control study. , 1997, Acta cytologica.

[68]  S. Sato,et al.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: a case-control study in Miyagi, Japan. , 1995, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[69]  C. la Vecchia,et al.  Incidence, mortality and survival from invasive cervical cancer in Vaud, Switzerland, 1974-1991. , 1994, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[70]  J. Macgregor,et al.  Screening for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in north east Scotland shows fall in incidence and mortality from invasive cancer with concomitant rise in preinvasive disease , 1994, BMJ.

[71]  L. Brinton,et al.  Screening for cervical cancer in Latin America: a case-control study. , 1992, International journal of epidemiology.

[72]  K. Tajima,et al.  [An epidemiological evaluation of the efficacy of mass screening for uterine cancer in Japan. The relationship between coverage rate of mass screening and reduction in death rate from uterine cancer]. , 1992, [Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health.

[73]  R. Bourne,et al.  Cancer of the cervix--old and young, now and then. , 1991, Gynecologic oncology.

[74]  D. Eddy Screening for cervical cancer. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[75]  D. Palli,et al.  A centralised cytology screening programme for cervical cancer in Florence. , 1990, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[76]  D. Celentano,et al.  Duration of relative protection of screening for cervical cancer. , 1989, Preventive medicine.

[77]  S. Cecchini,et al.  Sensitivity of the screening program for cervical cancer in the Florence District. , 1989, Gynecologic oncology.

[78]  T. Sobue,et al.  A Case‐Control Study of the Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening in Osaka, Japan , 1988, Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann.

[79]  Alwyn Smith,et al.  Cervical cytology screening , 1988, British medical journal.

[80]  J. L. Benedet,et al.  Organisation and results of the cervical cytology screening programme in British Columbia, 1955-85 , 1988, British medical journal.

[81]  N. Day,et al.  TRENDS IN MORTALITY FROM CERVICAL CANCER IN THE NORDIC COUNTRIES: ASSOCIATION WITH ORGANISED SCREENING PROGRAMMES , 1987, The Lancet.

[82]  A. Andersen,et al.  Mass screening for cervical cancer in øtfold county of norway 1959‐77 , 1987, International journal of cancer.

[83]  F. Pettersson,et al.  Evaluation of screening for cervical cancer in Sweden: trends in incidence and mortality 1958-1980. , 1985, International journal of epidemiology.

[84]  I. Duncan,et al.  SCREENING FOR CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA IN DUNDEE AND ANGUS 1962-81 AND ITS RELATION WITH INVASIVE CERVICAL CANCER , 1985, The Lancet.

[85]  N. Day,et al.  A case-control study of cervical cancer screening in north east Scotland. , 1985, British medical journal.

[86]  A. Berget Influence of population screening on morbidity and mortality of cancer of the uterine cervix in Maribo Amt. , 1979, Danish medical bulletin.

[87]  N. Day,et al.  The effect of mass screening in iceland, 1965–74, on the incidence and mortality of cervical carcinoma , 1978, International journal of cancer.

[88]  A. Miller,et al.  Mortality from cancer of the uterus in canada and its relationship to screening for cancer of the cervix , 1976, International journal of cancer.

[89]  J. Dankert,et al.  PHAGOCYTOSIS IN CHRONIC GRANULOMATOUS DISEASE , 1975, The Lancet.

[90]  M. Hakama,et al.  Mass screenings for cervical cancer in Finland 1963-71. Organization, extent, and epidemiological implications. , 1975, Annals of clinical research.

[91]  D. Mattingly,et al.  AGE AND SLEEP. , 1964, Lancet.

[92]  O. Brawley,et al.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening , 2009, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[93]  J. Stockman Human papillomavirus DNA testing for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer: 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled implementation trial , 2009 .

[94]  J. Habbema,et al.  [Insufficient basis for the inclusion of Human papillomavirus vaccination in the National Immunisation Programme in The Netherlands]. , 2008, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[95]  S. Akamatsu,et al.  The propriety of the gynecological mass screening-Comparison of the liquid based method and the conventional method- , 2005 .

[96]  M. Hakama,et al.  Cervical cancer incidence and mortality trends in Finland and Estonia: a screened vs. an unscreened population. , 1993, European journal of cancer.