Putting Biomedical Ontologies to Work

OBJECTIVES Biomedical ontologies exist to serve integration of clinical and experimental data, and it is critical to their success that they be put to widespread use in the annotation of data. How, then, can ontologies achieve the sort of user-friendliness, reliability, cost-effectiveness, and breadth of coverage that is necessary to ensure extensive usage? METHODS Our focus here is on two different sets of answers to these questions that have been proposed, on the one hand in medicine, by the SNOMED CT community, and on the other hand in biology, by the OBO Foundry. We address more specifically the issue as to how adherence to certain development principles can advance the usability and effectiveness of an ontology or terminology resource, for example by allowing more accurate maintenance, more reliable application, and more efficient interoperation with other ontologies and information resources. RESULTS SNOMED CT and the OBO Foundry differ considerably in their general approach. Nevertheless, a general trend towards more formal rigor and cross-domain interoperability can be seen in both and we argue that this trend should be accepted by all similar initiatives in the future. CONCLUSIONS Future efforts in ontology development have to address the need for harmonization and integration of ontologies across disciplinary borders, and for this, coherent formalization of ontologies is a pre-requisite.

[1]  Barry Smith,et al.  From concepts to clinical reality: An essay on the benchmarking of biomedical terminologies , 2006, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[2]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  OBO to OWL: a protégé OWL tab to read/save OBO ontologies , 2007, Bioinform..

[3]  Olivier Bodenreider,et al.  The Ontology-Epistemology Divide: A Case Study in Medical Terminology. , 2004, Formal ontology in information systems : proceedings of the ... International Conference. FOIS.

[4]  Barry Smith,et al.  On the Application of Formal Principles to Life Science Data: a Case Study in the Gene Ontology , 2004, DILS.

[5]  Jeffrey P. Krischer,et al.  Research Paper: Variation of SNOMED CT Coding of Clinical Research Concepts among Coding Experts , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  Kei-Hoi Cheung,et al.  Advancing translational research with the Semantic Web , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[7]  M. Ashburner,et al.  The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  A. Rector,et al.  Relations in biomedical ontologies , 2005, Genome Biology.

[9]  Barry Smith,et al.  Biodynamic ontology: applying BFO in the biomedical domain. , 2004, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[10]  Christopher G. Chute,et al.  The National Center for Biomedical Ontology , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[11]  James J. Cimino,et al.  Reliability of SNOMED-CT Coding by Three Physicians using Two Terminology Browsers , 2006, AMIA.

[12]  Gene Ontology Consortium The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource , 2003 .

[13]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  Would SNOMED CT benefit from Realism-Based Ontology Evolution? , 2007, AMIA.

[14]  B Marshall,et al.  Gene Ontology Consortium: The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  J. Cimino Desiderata for Controlled Medical Vocabularies in the Twenty-First Century , 1998, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[16]  Steven Weber,et al.  The Success of Open Source , 2004 .

[17]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  Toward an Ontological Treatment of Disease and Diagnosis , 2009, Summit on translational bioinformatics.

[18]  Barry Smith Ontology (Science) , 2008, FOIS.

[19]  M. Brochhausen,et al.  Establishing and Harmonising Ontologies in an Interdisciplinary Health Care and Clinical Research Environment * , 2008 .

[20]  Franz Baader,et al.  SNOMED CT's Problem List: Ontologists' and Logicians' Therapy Suggestions , 2007, MedInfo.

[21]  Theo Tryfonas,et al.  Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications , 2009 .

[22]  W Ceusters,et al.  A Terminological and Ontological Analysis of the NCI Thesaurus , 2005, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[23]  Steffen Schulze-Kremer,et al.  The Ontology of the Gene Ontology , 2003, AMIA.

[24]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  Towards a Reference Terminology for Ontology Research and Development in the Biomedical Domain , 2006, KR-MED.

[25]  José L. V. Mejino,et al.  A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy , 2003, J. Biomed. Informatics.