Processing-in-Memory Development Strategy for AI Computing Using Main-Path and Doc2Vec Analyses

Processing-in-Memory (PiM), which combines a memory device with a Processing Unit (PU) into an integrated chip, has drawn special attention in the field of Artificial Intelligence semiconductors. Currently, in the development and commercialization of PiM’s technology, there are challenges in the hegemony competition between the PU and memory device industries. In addition, there are challenges in finding strategic partnerships rather than independent development due to the complexity of technological development caused by heterogeneous chips. In this study, patent Main Path Analysis (MPA) is used to identify the majority and complementary groups between PU and memory devices for PiM. Subsequently, Document-to-Vector (Doc2Vec) and similarity-scoring analyses are used to determine the potential partners for technical cooperation required for PiM technology development for the majority group identified. According to the empirical results, PiM core technology is evolving from PU to memory device with an ‘architecture-operation-architecture’ design pattern. The ten ASIC candidates are identified for strategic partnerships with memory device suppliers. Those partnership candidates include several mobile AP firms, implying PiM’s opportunities in the field of mobile applications. It suggests that memory device suppliers should prepare for different technology strategies for PiM technology development. This study contributes to the literature and high-tech industry via the proposed quantitative technology partnership model.

[1]  Joo-Young Kim,et al.  South Korea's Nationwide Effort for AI Semiconductor Industry , 2023, Communications of the ACM.

[2]  Aaron R. Young,et al.  A survey on processing-in-memory techniques: Advances and challenges , 2022, Memories - Materials, Devices, Circuits and Systems.

[3]  Samuli Laato,et al.  Trends and Trajectories in the Software Industry: implications for the future of work , 2022, Information Systems Frontiers.

[4]  F. J. Ramírez,et al.  Measuring open innovation under uncertainty: A fuzzy logic approach , 2022, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management.

[5]  Guy E. Blelloch,et al.  The Processing-in-Memory Model , 2021, SPAA.

[6]  Lili Wang,et al.  Mapping technological trajectories and exploring knowledge sources: A case study of 3D printing technologies , 2020 .

[7]  Hui Yang,et al.  Chiplet Heterogeneous Integration Technology—Status and Challenges , 2020, Electronics.

[8]  Ming Cao,et al.  Tracing Knowledge Development Trajectories of the Internet of Things Domain: A Main Path Analysis , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[9]  Fang-Mei Tseng,et al.  Developmental trajectories of new energy vehicle research in economic management: Main path analysis , 2018, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[10]  Juneseuk Shin,et al.  Mapping extended technological trajectories: integration of main path, derivative paths, and technology junctures , 2018, Scientometrics.

[11]  Tim Hwang,et al.  Computational Power and the Social Impact of Artificial Intelligence , 2018, ArXiv.

[12]  Ramyad Hadidi,et al.  CAIRO , 2017, ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim..

[13]  So Young Sohn,et al.  Firms’ Negative Perceptions on Patents, Technology Management Strategies, and Subsequent Performance , 2017 .

[14]  Yu Wang,et al.  PRIME: A Novel Processing-in-Memory Architecture for Neural Network Computation in ReRAM-Based Main Memory , 2016, 2016 ACM/IEEE 43rd Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA).

[15]  Yu Xiao,et al.  Knowledge diffusion path analysis of data quality literature: A main path analysis , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[16]  F. Strozzi,et al.  Supply chain risk management: a new methodology for a systematic literature review , 2012 .

[17]  Jeffrey Cummings,et al.  Best-fit Alliance Partners: The Use of Critical Success Factors in a Comprehensive Partner Selection Process , 2012 .

[18]  Mu-Hsuan Huang,et al.  Evolution of Technology Dependence among Leading Semiconductor Companies , 2011, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[19]  Wann-Yih Wu,et al.  The analytic network process for partner selection criteria in strategic alliances , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Pek-Hooi Soh,et al.  Technology alliances and networks: an external link to research capability , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[21]  B. Nielsen An Empirical Investigation of the Drivers of International Strategic Alliance Formation , 2003 .

[22]  Thomas A. Hemphill,et al.  Strategic Research Partnerships: A Managerial Perspective , 2003, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[23]  Frank T. Rothaermel,et al.  Technological discontinuities and interfirm cooperation: what determines a startup's attractiveness as alliance partner? , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[24]  Judy C. Shetler,et al.  Building Cooperation in a Competitive Industry: Sematech and the Semiconductor Industry , 1995 .

[25]  J. M. Geringer,et al.  Strategic Determinants of Partner Selection Criteria in International Joint Ventures , 1991 .

[26]  Norman P. Hummon,et al.  Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory☆ , 1989 .

[27]  N. Gerdsri,et al.  Positioning academic partners to align with proper modes of university-industry collaboration , 2020, International Journal of Business Innovation and Research.

[28]  T. Bauernhansl,et al.  Managing complexity in supply chains: A discussion of current approaches on the example of the semiconductor industry , 2013 .