Cu(In,Ga)Se2 superstrate solar cells: prospects and limitations

Superstrate solar cells were prepared by thermal evaporation of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 onto ZnO coated glass substrates. For the first time, photo-conversion efficiencies above 11% were reached without the necessity of additional light soaking or forward biasing of the solar cell. This was achieved by modifying the deposition process as well as the sodium doping. Limitations of the superstrate device configuration and possible ways to overcome these were investigated by analyzing the hetero-interface with electron microscopy and X-ray photoemission spectroscopy measurements, combined with capacitance spectroscopy and device simulations. A device model was derived that explains how on the one hand the GaOx, which forms at the CIGSe/ZnO interface, reduces the interface recombination. On the other hand how it limits the efficiency by acting as an electron barrier at the hetero-interface presumably because of a high density of negatively charged acceptor states like CuGa. The addition of sodium enhances the p-type doping of the absorber but also increases the net doping within the GaOx. Hence, a trade-off between these two effects is required. The conversion efficiency was found to decrease over time, which can be explained in our model by field-induced diffusion of sodium cations out from the GaOx layer. The proposed device model is able to explain various effects frequently observed upon light soaking and forward biasing of superstrate devices. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Hideo Hosono,et al.  Chemical Design and Thin Film Preparation of p-Type Conductive Transparent Oxides , 2000 .

[2]  Joel B. Varley,et al.  Oxygen vacancies and donor impurities in β-Ga2O3 , 2010 .

[3]  M. Tovar,et al.  Investigation of structural anomaly and metal ordering in the solid solution 2ZnS–CuInS2 by neutron diffraction , 2004 .

[4]  N. Barreau,et al.  Atom probe study of sodium distribution in polycrystalline Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin film , 2010 .

[5]  H. Schock,et al.  Generation-dependent charge carrier transport in Cu(In,Ga)Se2/CdS/ZnO thin-film solar-cells , 2013 .

[6]  L. M. Foster,et al.  Phase Diagram of the System Na2O·Ga2O3‐Ga2O3 and its Relation to the System Na2O·Al2O3‐Al2O3 , 1980 .

[7]  T. Nakada,et al.  Novel device structure for Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin film solar cells using transparent conducting oxide back and front contacts , 2004 .

[8]  Zhiyong Fan,et al.  β-Ga2O3 nanowires: Synthesis, characterization, and p-channel field-effect transistor , 2005 .

[9]  H. Schock,et al.  Effect of Zn incorporation into CuInS2 solar cell absorbers on microstructural and electrical properties , 2011 .

[10]  W. Shafarman,et al.  Bulk and metastable defects in CuIn1−xGaxSe2 thin films using drive-level capacitance profiling , 2004 .

[11]  A. Seitsonen,et al.  Effect of sodium incorporation into CuInSe2 from first principles , 2013 .

[12]  H. Zogg,et al.  Light soaking effects in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 superstrate solar cells , 2003 .

[13]  J. Larsen,et al.  Formation of Ga2O3 barrier layer in Cu (InGa) Se2 superstrate devices with ZnO buffer layer , 2013 .

[14]  H. Zogg,et al.  11% efficiency on CIGS superstrate solar cells without sodium precursor , 2002, Conference Record of the Twenty-Ninth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2002..

[15]  R. Fornari,et al.  Schottky barrier height of Au on the transparent semiconducting oxide β-Ga2O3 , 2012 .

[16]  T. Miyata,et al.  Work function of transparent conducting multicomponent oxide thin films prepared by magnetron sputtering , 1998 .

[17]  Akito Kuramata,et al.  Gallium oxide (Ga2O3) metal-semiconductor field-effect transistors on single-crystal β-Ga2O3 (010) substrates , 2012 .

[18]  A. Zunger,et al.  n -type doping of CuIn Se 2 and CuGa Se 2 , 2005 .

[19]  Akio Kunioka,et al.  Effects of Sodium on Cu(In, Ga)Se2-Based Thin Films and Solar Cells , 1997 .

[20]  Jürgen H. Werner,et al.  Alternative back contact materials for thin film Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells , 2003 .

[21]  T. Wada,et al.  Tandem solar cells with Cu(In,Ga)S2 top cells on ZnO coated substrates , 2010 .

[22]  H. Zogg,et al.  Characterization of CuGaxSey/ZnO for superstrate solar cells , 2000 .

[23]  David Cahen,et al.  Effects of Sodium on Polycrystalline Cu(In,Ga)Se2 and Its Solar Cell Performance , 1998 .

[24]  M. Burgelman,et al.  Advanced electrical simulation of thin film solar cells , 2013 .

[25]  M. Edoff,et al.  Temperature‐dependent current‐voltage and lightsoaking measurements on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with ALD‐Zn1‐xMgxO buffer layers , 2009 .

[26]  T. Wada,et al.  Preparation of wide gap Cu(In,Ga)S2 films on ZnO coated substrates , 2009 .

[27]  R. Klenk,et al.  Influence of damp heat on the optical and electrical properties of Al-doped zinc oxide , 2009 .

[28]  H. Takakura,et al.  Cu(In,Ga)Se2 superstrate-type solar cells with Zn1−xMgxO buffer layers , 2012 .

[29]  G. Eriksson,et al.  ChemSage—A computer program for the calculation of complex chemical equilibria , 1990 .

[30]  Superstrate-type CuInSe2-based thin film solar cells by a low-temperature process using sodium compounds , 1998 .

[31]  R. Klenk,et al.  Progress in CuGaSe/sub 2/ based thin film solar cells , 1991, The Conference Record of the Twenty-Second IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1991.

[32]  I. Repins,et al.  19·9%‐efficient ZnO/CdS/CuInGaSe2 solar cell with 81·2% fill factor , 2008 .

[33]  Bernd Rech,et al.  Improved electrical transport in Al-doped zinc oxide by thermal treatment , 2010 .