Level effects in psychophysical two-tone suppression.

Measurements of psychophysical two-tone suppression in a number of subjects are described. Levels of the stimulus components (suppressee, L1, and suppressor, L2) were the primary experimental variables. In all experiments the pulsation threshold was used with the probe frequency fr fixed at the suppressee frequency f1. In an initial experiment f1 was fixed at 1 kHz. The suppressor frequency f2 ranged from 0.2 to 1.4 kHz. At appropriate levels all subjects showed significant suppression. Suppression was found to decrease to zero as f2 approached f1. The amount of suppression depended on both L1 and L2 in a way not accounted for by any of the current theories of two-tone suppression. At higher overall levels suppression became increasingly prominent. The amount of two-tone suppression in a given stimulus condition depended strongly on the subject. The maximum amount of suppression measured was about 35 dB. In a second experiment it was verified that suppression follows the same pattern at other frequencies f1 (0.5, 2, and 4 kHz). Data for equal f2/f1 ratios were quite similar. The two-tone suppression effect decreased in a noisy environment. Within a 20-dB range of signal-to-noise ratios the effect of noise changed from negligible to the virtually complete elimination of two-tone suppression.

[1]  B C Moore.  "Suppression" effects in forward masking. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  P. Abbas.  Effects of stimulus frequency on two-tone suppression: a comparison of physiological and psychophysical results. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  J J Zwislocki,et al.  Tectorial membrane: a possible effect on frequency analysis in the cochlea. , 1979, Science.

[4]  J. L. Hall.  Two-tone suppression in a nonlinear model of the basilar membrane. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  N Suga,et al.  Properties of ‘two‐tone inhibition’ in primary auditory neurones , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  N. Suga,et al.  DISCHARGE PATTERN AND INHIBITION OF PRIMARY AUDITORY NERVE FIBERS IN THE MONKEY. , 1964, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  T. Houtgast.  Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Effects of stimulus frequency on two‐tone suppression: A comparison of physiological and psychophysical results , 1978 .

[9]  C. D. Geisler,et al.  Two-tone suppression in auditory nerve of the cat: rate-intensity and temporal analyses. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  R. Shannon.  Two-tone unmasking and suppression in a forward-masking situation. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  L. Vogten.  Pure-Tone Masking: A New Result from a New Method , 1974 .

[12]  D. L. Weber,et al.  Suppression effects in backward and forward masking. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  L. Feth,et al.  Relationship between auditory frequency selectivity and two‐tone suppression , 1978 .

[14]  H. Duifhuis.  Consequences of peripheral frequency selectivity for nonsimultaneous masking. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  Neuro-Mechanical Frequency Analysis in the Cochlea , 1974 .

[16]  R. R. Pfeiffer,et al.  A model for two-tone inhibition of single cochlear-nerve fibers. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  E. Zwicker.  On a Psychoacoustical Equivalent of Tuning Curves , 1974 .

[18]  P J Abbas,et al.  Two-tone suppression in auditory-nerve fibers: extension of a stimulus-response relationship. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  M. Sachs,et al.  Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  P. Sellick,et al.  Tuning properties of cochlear hair cells , 1977, Nature.

[21]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  Phenomenological model for two‐tone suppression , 1976 .

[22]  A M Engebretson,et al.  Model for the nonlinear characteristics of cochlear potentials. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  E. J. Kletsky,et al.  The tectorial membrane may sharpen the cochlear frequency selectivity , 1978 .

[24]  B. Moore.  Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  H. Fastl.  Pulsation patterns of sinusoids vs. critical band noise , 1975 .

[26]  D. L. Weber.  Suppression and critical bands in band-limiting experiments. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  D L Weber,et al.  Temporal factors and suppression effects in backward and forward masking. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  B. Leshowitz,et al.  Measurement of nonlinearities in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss , 1977 .

[29]  H. Duifhuis,et al.  Cochlear nonlinearity and second filter: possible mechanism and implications. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  H. Duifhuis.  Cochlear nonlinearity and second filter : a psychophysical evaluation , 1977 .

[31]  L. Vogten,et al.  Simultaneous pure-tone masking: the dependence of masking asymmetries on intensity. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  R D Patterson,et al.  Stimulus variability and auditory filter shape. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  H. Greenbaum,et al.  Interference and two-tone inhibition. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  R. L. Wegel,et al.  The Auditory Masking of One Pure Tone by Another and its Probable Relation to the Dynamics of the Inner Ear , 1924 .