Networks of Inventors and the Location of University Research: An Exploration of Italian Data

University-industry knowledge transfer is nowadays a very fashionable research subject, both in economics, and in management and policy studies. "Distance" between the two realms of academic and industrial research has been increasingly called in to explain the extent at which the academic research benefits (or should benefit) the industrial R&D. In particular, empirical research has focussed on two concepts of "distance": geographical and cognitive. However, both kinds of proximity favour industrial R&D performance insofar they are facilitating factors for reducing social distance between academic and industrial researchers, which result in the exchange of knowledge through codified means or the mobility of researchers. We suggest that both classic and more recent contributions to the economics of knowledge, as well as most of the empirical research on the contribution of universities to commercial innovation, imply or openly suggest a number of propositions on social networks, both of corporate researchers and academic scientists, as well as of researchers from both communities. We also suggest that testing those propositions requires the identification of social links among corporate researchers, which in turn calls for data on personal acquaintances and the application of tools taken from social network analysis. We then describe the results of our data collection efforts in that direction (the EPO-INV and EPO-INV-DOC databases), and a few exploratory findings.

[1]  M. Meeus,et al.  Regional systems of innovation from within.An empirical specification of the relation between technological dynamics and interaction between multiple actors in a Dutch region , 1999 .

[2]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[3]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[4]  A. Jaffe Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[5]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Patenting and Licensing University Inventions: Lessons from the History of the Research Corporation , 2001 .

[6]  Paul A. David,et al.  The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness , 2000 .

[7]  Leon A.G. Oerlemans,et al.  Regional systems of innovation from within , 1999 .

[8]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[9]  L. Bottazzi,et al.  Innovation and Spillovers in Regions: Evidence from European Patent Data , 2002 .

[10]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[11]  W. Edward Steinmueller,et al.  Will New Information and Communication Technologies Improve the 'Codification' of Knowledge? , 2000 .

[12]  Michel Callon,et al.  Is Science a Public Good? Fifth Mullins Lecture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 23 March 1993 , 1994 .

[13]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[14]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific , 1996 .

[15]  A. Jaffe The U.S. patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process , 2000 .

[16]  Robin Cowan,et al.  The dynamics of collective invention , 2003 .

[17]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers And Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey , 2001 .

[18]  R. Nelson The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  Localised knowledge spillovers vs. innovative milieux: Knowledge “tacitness” reconsidered , 2001 .

[20]  R. Merton Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. , 1957 .

[21]  David C. Mowery,et al.  University Patents and Patent Policy Debates in the USA, 1925–1980 , 2001 .

[22]  D. Hicks Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/Private Character of Knowledge , 1995 .

[23]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Geographic Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations , 1993 .

[24]  Todd Sandler,et al.  The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods: Alternative mechanisms for provision of public goods , 1996 .

[25]  E. Mansfield Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations , 1995 .

[26]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2004 .

[27]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Does Proximity Matter for Knowledge Transfer from Public Institutes and Universities to Firms , 2001 .

[28]  M. Feldman The New Economics Of Innovation, Spillovers And Agglomeration: Areview Of Empirical Studies , 1999 .

[29]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[30]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[31]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .