In vivo and in vitro random mutagenesis techniques in plants

Abstract Mutations are changes in the genetic material that may be transmitted to subsequent generations. Mutations appear spontaneously in nature and are one of the underlying driving forces of evolution. In plants, in vivo and in vitro random mutagenesis relies on the application of physical and chemical mutagens to increase the frequency of mutations thus accelerating the selection of varieties with important agronomic traits. The European Commission has requested EFSA to provide a more detailed description of in vivo and in vitro random mutagenesis techniques and the types of mutations and mechanisms involved, to be able to conclude on whether in vivo and in vitro random mutagenesis techniques are to be considered different techniques. To address the European Commission request, a literature search was conducted to collect information on the random mutagenesis techniques used in plants both in vivo and in vitro, on the type of mutations generated by such techniques and on the molecular mechanisms underlying formation of those mutations. The GMO Panel concludes that most physical and chemical mutagenesis techniques have been applied both in vivo and in vitro; the mutation process and the repair mechanisms act at cellular level and thus there is no difference between application of the mutagen in vivo or in vitro; and the type of mutations induced by a specific mutagen are expected to be the same, regardless of whether such mutagen is applied in vivo or in vitro. Indeed, the same mutation and the derived trait in a given plant species can be potentially obtained using both in vivo and in vitro random mutagenesis and the resulting mutants would be indistinguishable. Therefore, the GMO Panel concludes that the distinction between plants obtained by in vitro or in vivo approaches is not justified.

[1]  S. Singer,et al.  Genetic Variation and Unintended Risk in the Context of Old and New Breeding Techniques , 2021 .

[2]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Mutation breeding , 2021, Plant Breeding and Cultivar Development.

[3]  H. Naegeli,et al.  Applicability of the EFSA Opinion on site‐directed nucleases type 3 for the safety assessment of plants developed using site‐directed nucleases type 1 and 2 and oligonucleotide‐directed mutagenesis , 2020, EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority.

[4]  Elisa Aiassa,et al.  Draft framework for protocol development for EFSA's scientific assessments , 2020 .

[5]  V. E. Viana,et al.  Mutagenesis in Rice: The Basis for Breeding a New Super Plant , 2019, Front. Plant Sci..

[6]  A. Sakamoto Translesion Synthesis in Plants: Ultraviolet Resistance and Beyond , 2019, Front. Plant Sci..

[7]  R. Deshmukh,et al.  Expanding Avenue of Fast Neutron Mediated Mutagenesis for Crop Improvement , 2019, Plants.

[8]  Colegio de Postgraduados,et al.  Mutagenesis in the improvement of ornamental plants , 2019, Revista Chapingo Serie Horticultura.

[9]  R. Ibrahim,et al.  Mutation Breeding in Ornamentals , 2018 .

[10]  Rujin Chen,et al.  Physical Mutagenesis in Medicago truncatula Using Fast Neutron Bombardment (FNB) for Symbiosis and Developmental Biology Studies. , 2018, Methods in molecular biology.

[11]  B. Till,et al.  TILLING: The Next Generation. , 2018, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[12]  G. Walker,et al.  Mechanisms of DNA damage, repair, and mutagenesis , 2017, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[13]  Chikelu,et al.  Mutagenesis for Crop Breeding and Functional Genomics , 2017 .

[14]  B. Till,et al.  Chemical Mutagenesis and Chimera Dissolution in Vegetatively Propagated Banana , 2017 .

[15]  Xianmin Diao,et al.  Foxtail Millet Breeding in China , 2017 .

[16]  J. Kumlehn,et al.  Biotechnologies for Plant Mutation Breeding: Protocols , 2017 .

[17]  A. D’Andrea,et al.  Repair Pathway Choices and Consequences at the Double-Strand Break. , 2016, Trends in cell biology.

[18]  M. Laimer,et al.  Plant Mutation Breeding: Current Progress and Future Assessment , 2015 .

[19]  V. Manova,et al.  DNA damage and repair in plants – from models to crops , 2015, Front. Plant Sci..

[20]  G. Pan,et al.  Haploid Strategies for Functional Validation of Plant Genes. , 2015, Trends in biotechnology.

[21]  B. Till,et al.  Forward and Reverse Genetics in Crop Breeding , 2015 .

[22]  Khalid Rehman Hakeem Crop Production and Global Environmental Issues , 2015, Springer International Publishing.

[23]  B. Bahadur Plant diversity, organization, function and improvement , 2015 .

[24]  F. Sarsu,et al.  Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture , 2015 .

[25]  U. Lundqvist Scandinavian mutation research in barley - a historical review. , 2014, Hereditas.

[26]  S. Datta 5. Induced mutagenesis: basic knowledge for technological success , 2014 .

[27]  P. Suprasanna,et al.  Induced mutagenesis for improving plant abiotic stress tolerance , 2014 .

[28]  B. K. Banerji,et al.  Chapter 15 - Mutation breeding and mutants of ornamental plants: the role of NBRI for economic gains , 2014 .

[29]  A. Sheena Chapter 6 - Novel trends and achievements in breeding of tropical ornamental crops especially orchids and anthuriums: the mutation breeding approach , 2014 .

[30]  D. Ilchovska Chapter 8 - Chemical mutagenesis, mutation breeding and quantitative genetic analyses of maize mutants: from theory to practice , 2014 .

[31]  P. Ahmad,et al.  Mutation Breeding: A Novel Technique for Genetic Improvement of Pulse Crops Particularly Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) , 2014 .

[32]  L. Lee,et al.  Mutation and mutation screening. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[33]  A. Furtado,et al.  Cereal Genomics , 2014, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[34]  Kai Rothkamm,et al.  The shape of the radiation dose response for DNA double-strand break induction and repair , 2013, Genome Integrity.

[35]  C. Mba Induced Mutations Unleash the Potentials of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture , 2013 .

[36]  B. Forster,et al.  Plant Mutation Breeding and Biotechnology , 2012 .

[37]  T. Anai Potential of a mutant-based reverse genetic approach for functional genomics and molecular breeding in soybean , 2012, Breeding science.

[38]  B. Forster,et al.  A brief history of plant mutagenesis. , 2012 .

[39]  D. Leung,et al.  Chemical mutagenesis for improving potential of plants to remediate environments with heavy metal contaminants. , 2012 .

[40]  S. Henikoff,et al.  A protocol for TILLING and eco-TILLING. , 2012 .

[41]  B. Forster,et al.  Methodology for physical and chemical mutagenic treatments. , 2012 .

[42]  A. Figueira,et al.  In Vivo and in Vitro Mutation Breeding of Citrus , 2012 .

[43]  Patade Vikas Yadav,et al.  In Vitro Mutagenesis and Selection in Plant Tissue Cultures and their Prospects for Crop Improvement , 2012 .

[44]  B. Mou Mutations in Lettuce Improvement , 2012, International journal of plant genomics.

[45]  M. C. Pagariya,et al.  Biotechnological Developments in Sugarcane Improvement: An Overview , 2011, Sugar Tech.

[46]  R. Pathirana Plant mutation breeding in agriculture. , 2011 .

[47]  A. Aremu,et al.  Somaclonal variation in plants: causes and detection methods , 2011, Plant Growth Regulation.

[48]  A. Tanaka,et al.  Applications to Biotechnology: Ion-Beam Breeding of Plants , 2010 .

[49]  M. Kawaguchi,et al.  Physically induced mutation: ion beam mutagenesis. , 2010 .

[50]  Chikelu,et al.  Induced Mutagenesis in Plants Using Physical and Chemical Agents , 2010 .

[51]  Chikelu,et al.  TILLING for Mutations in Model Plants and Crops , 2010 .

[52]  N. Tuteja,et al.  Genotoxic stress in plants: shedding light on DNA damage, repair and DNA repair helicases. , 2009, Mutation research.

[53]  D. Chakrabarty,et al.  Management of chimera and in vitro mutagenesis for development of new flower color/shape and chlorophyll variegated mutants in chrysanthemum. , 2009 .

[54]  Q. Shu,et al.  Creation and evaluation of induced mutants and valuable tools for pepper breeding programmes. , 2009 .

[55]  H. Nakagawa Induced Mutations in Plant Breeding and Biological Researches in Japan , 2009 .

[56]  P. Larkin,et al.  Somaclonal variation — a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement , 1981, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[57]  A. Mozumder,et al.  Charged Particle and Photon Interactions with Matter : Chemical, Physicochemical, and Biological Consequences with Applications , 2003 .

[58]  D. Brar,et al.  Developing blast-resistant lines in rice through tissue culture methods. , 2003 .

[59]  S. Epstein,et al.  Chemical Mutagenesis , 1971, Nature.

[60]  A. Ando Mutation induction in rice by radiation combined with chemical protectants and mutagens. , 1968 .

[61]  T. Matsuo Review of research on use of radiation-induced mutations in crop breeding with special reference to rice in Japan , 1962 .

[62]  L. Ehrenberg Induced mutation in plants: mechanisms and principles. , 1960 .

[63]  E. A. Favret Induced mutations for resistance to diseases. , 1960 .

[64]  C. Konzak III. Genetic Effects of Radiation on Higher Plants , 1957, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[65]  J. M. Key Mutation breeding in Europe. , 1956 .

[66]  L. Stadler,et al.  MUTATIONS IN BARLEY INDUCED BY X-RAYS AND RADIUM. , 1928, Science.

[67]  H J Muller,et al.  ARTIFICIAL TRANSMUTATION OF THE GENE. , 1927, Science.