Between the Social and the Technical: Negotiation of Human-Centered Robotics Design in a Middle School Classroom

This paper presents a middle school human-centered robotics (HCR) learning experience and the ways in which it supported students’ orientation to technical and social aspects of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). The interdisciplinary project associated with this analysis aims to engage diverse students in authentic STEM practices by creating robotic technologies that can assist people in their school, and connect with remote peers. The goal of this project is to increase student interest in and knowledge of STEM topics, and to help students recognize STEM as relevant to their daily lives and broader societal issues. The human-centered focus of the curriculum encouraged thinking from multiple perspectives (e.g. design, social science, programming) and allowed for diverse STEM exploration. We present samples from student work and classroom interactions. These samples show challenges and successes in engaging students with STEM as a combination of social and technical questions and skills. We trace the trajectory of one group’s work to highlight moments in which students navigated an engineering design cycle, analyzed and designed social environments, and crossed disciplinary domains through HCR design—using a phenomena, mechanisms, components framework (PMC) to explore systems thinking. Phenomena refers to attention to the function of the robotic technology in the classroom environment. Components included a focus on single parts of the robot, while mechanism addressed how parts of the robot worked together. This qualitative case study demonstrates the capacity social robotics and inquiry-based learning experiences hold for broadening notions of STEM as a social and multidisciplinary learning domain.

[1]  Jerry B. Weinberg,et al.  The Impact of Robot Projects on Girl's Attitudes Toward Science and Engineering , 2007 .

[2]  J. Kolodner.  Facilitating the Learning of Design Practices: Lessons Learned from an Inquiry into Science Education. , 2002 .

[3]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Robots in Society, Society in Robots , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[4]  Judith L. Green,et al.  Limits to Certainty in Interpreting Video Data: Interactional Ethnography and Disciplinary Knowledge , 2007 .

[5]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Wicked Problems in Design Thinking , 1992 .

[6]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by Design(tm) Into Practice , 2003 .

[7]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Dragons, Ladybugs, and Softballs: Girls’ STEM Engagement with Human-Centered Robotics , 2016 .

[8]  C. Hmelo‐Silver.  Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? , 2004 .

[9]  Dale R. Baker,et al.  Letting girls speak out about science , 1995 .

[10]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Collaborative group engagement in a computer-supported inquiry learning environment , 2015, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[11]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .

[12]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Designing to Learn About Complex Systems , 2000 .

[13]  B. Scassellati,et al.  Robots for use in autism research. , 2012, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[14]  Douglas Williams,et al.  A Preliminary Study Exploring the Use of Fictional Narrative in Robotics Activities , 2010 .

[15]  C. Maher,et al.  An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data☆ , 2003 .

[16]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  The Neighborhood Networks project: a case study of critical engagement and creative expression through participatory design , 2008, PDC.

[17]  Uvais Qidwai.  A LAMP-LEGO experience of motivating minority students to study engineering , 2007, SGCS.

[18]  C. Hmelo‐Silver,et al.  Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) , 2007 .

[19]  Stefan Schaal,et al.  The New Robotics—towards Human-centered Machines , 2007 .

[20]  Bradley S. Barker,et al.  Robotics as Means to Increase Achievement Scores in an Informal Learning Environment , 2007 .

[21]  S. Turkle,et al.  Epistemological Pluralism and the Revaluation of the Concrete. , 1992 .

[22]  Judith L. Green,et al.  Investigating Inclusive Practices: An Interactional Ethnographic Approach , 2009 .

[23]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[24]  M. Robinson,et al.  Teaching Evolution to Non-English Proficient Students by Using Lego Robotics , 2007 .

[25]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Materials for Enabling Hands-On Robotics and STEM Education , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Semantic Scientific Knowledge Integration.

[26]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  Robot Diaries: Broadening Participation in the Computer Science Pipeline through Social Technical Exploration , 2008, AAAI Spring Symposium: Using AI to Motivate Greater Participation in Computer Science.

[27]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  All I really need to know (about creative thinking) I learned (by studying how children learn) in kindergarten , 2007, C&C '07.