Modelling the Interpretation of Discourse Connectives by Bayesian Pragmatics

We propose a framework to model human comprehension of discourse connectives. Following the Bayesian pragmatic paradigm, we advocate that discourse connectives are interpreted based on a simulation of the production process by the speaker, who, in turn, considers the ease of interpretation for the listener when choosing connectives. Evaluation against the sense annotation of the Penn Discourse Treebank confirms the superiority of the model over literal comprehension. A further experiment demonstrates that the proposed model also improves automatic discourse parsing.

[1]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Probabilistic Semantics and Pragmatics: Uncertainty in Language and Thought , 2015 .

[2]  Henk Zeevat,et al.  Perspectives on Bayesian Natural Language Semantics and Pragmatics , 2015 .

[3]  付伶俐 打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[4]  M. Pickering,et al.  An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[5]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Embedded Implicatures as Pragmatic Inferences under Compositional Lexical Uncertainty , 2015, J. Semant..

[6]  Christopher Potts,et al.  Learning in the Rational Speech Acts Model , 2015, ArXiv.

[7]  Michael L. Geis,et al.  Syntax and Semantics. Volume 3 : Speech Acts , 1976 .

[8]  Livio Robaldo,et al.  The Penn Discourse TreeBank 2.0. , 2008, LREC.

[9]  T. A. Dijk Teun A. Van Dijk the Semantics and Pragmatics of Functional Coherence in Discourse , 2004 .

[10]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Bayesian brain : probabilistic approaches to neural coding , 2006 .

[11]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Predicting Pragmatic Reasoning in Language Games , 2012, Science.

[12]  H. Grice Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[13]  Gerhard Jäger,et al.  Game theory in semantics and pragmatics , 2012 .

[14]  M. Pickering,et al.  Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  N. Chater,et al.  Précis of Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning , 2009, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Adjectival vagueness in a Bayesian model of interpretation , 2015, Synthese.

[17]  Henk Zeevat Bayesian interpretation and Optimality Theory , 2011 .

[18]  Hwee Tou Ng,et al.  The CoNLL-2015 Shared Task on Shallow Discourse Parsing , 2015, CoNLL.

[19]  M. Turvey,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception reviewed , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[21]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[22]  Roger Levy,et al.  Pragmatic reasoning through semantic inference , 2016, Semantics and Pragmatics.

[23]  Naomi Feldman,et al.  Why discourse affects speakers’ choice of referring expressions , 2015, ACL.

[24]  Mihai Surdeanu,et al.  The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit , 2014, ACL.

[25]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Nonliteral understanding of number words , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Knowledge and implicature: Modeling language understanding as social cognition , 2012, CogSci.

[27]  L. Vogt Game Theory And Pragmatics , 2016 .

[28]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Context, scale structure, and statistics in the interpretation of positive-form adjectives , 2013 .