Rethinking Trade Preferences: How Africa can Diversify its Exports

This paper argues that the contribution of trade preferences to economic development needs to be reappraised in light of the growth of globalized trade in manufactures. Trade preferences may be able to act as a catalyst for manufacturing exports, leading to rapid growth in exports and employment. To do so, preferences need to be designed to be consistent with international trade in fragmented 'tasks' (as opposed to complete products) and need to be open to countries with sufficient levels of complementary inputs such as skills and infrastructure. Recent experience with the African Growth and Opportunities Act shows that, in the right conditions, Sub-Saharan African countries have had large manufacturing export supply response to trade preferences.

[1]  A. Venables,et al.  Agglomeration and Economic Development: Import Substitution vs. Trade Liberalization , 1998 .

[2]  Peter Rodriguez.  Rules of Origin with Multistage Production , 2001 .

[3]  H. Kierzkowski,et al.  Fragmentation: New Production Patterns in the World Economy , 2001 .

[4]  D. Roy,et al.  Who Can Explain the Mauritian Miracle: Meade, Romer, Sachs or Rodrik? , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[5]  D. Roy,et al.  Who Can Explain The Mauritian Miracle , 2001 .

[6]  P. Bhattacharya.  Urbanisation in developing countries , 2002 .

[7]  D. Rodrik,et al.  Economic Development as Self-Discovery , 2002 .

[8]  A. Mattoo,et al.  The Africa Growth and Opportunity Act and its Rules of Origin: Generosity Undermined? , 2002 .

[9]  G. Duranton,et al.  Micro-Foundations of Urban Agglomeration Economies , 2003 .

[10]  Gordon H. Hanson.  What Has Happened to Wages in Mexico Since NAFTA? , 2003 .

[11]  S. Rosenthal,et al.  Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies , 2004 .

[12]  Lant Pritchett,et al.  Growth Accelerations , 2004 .

[13]  D. Rodrik.  Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century , 2004 .

[14]  S. Gupta,et al.  Sustaining Growth Accelerations and Pro-Poor Growth in Africa , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[15]  P. Low,et al.  Multilateral Solutions to the Erosion of Non-Reciprocal Preferences in Nama , 2005 .

[16]  M. Olarreaga,et al.  Agoa and Apparel: Who Captures the Tariff Rent in the Presence of Preferential Market Access? , 2005 .

[17]  P. Brenton,et al.  The value of trade preferences for Africa , 2005 .

[18]  Akiko Suwa-Eisenmann,et al.  The Origin of Goods , 2006 .

[19]  Gene M. Grossman,et al.  The rise of offshoring: it's not wine for cloth anymore , 2006 .

[20]  Anthony J. Venables,et al.  Shifts in Economic Geography and their Causes , 2006 .

[21]  W. Martin,et al.  PREFERENCE EROSION: THE TERMS OF THE DEBATE , 2006 .

[22]  Akiko Suwa-Eisenmann,et al.  The Origin of Goods: Rules of Origin in Regional Trade Agreements , 2006 .

[23]  Stephen N. Karingi,et al.  Could Extended Preferences Reward Sub‐Saharan Africa's Participation in the Doha Round Negotiations? , 2007 .

[24]  J. Markusen,et al.  Interacting factor endowments and trade costs: A multi-country, multi-good approach to trade theory , 2007 .

[25]  O. Cadot,et al.  Why OECD Countries Should Reform Rules of Origin , 2007 .

[26]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  The Anatomy of Start-Stop Growth , 2005, The Review of Economics and Statistics.