Finding the Other 5%: Understanding the Role of Social Networking Technologies in Building Personal Networks for Young Adults with Cancer

In this paper we explore the ways in which young adults with cancer (aged 17-24) build support networks through computer mediated personal networks. The support networks are influenced by technological affordances and the ongoing experiences of living with the illness and treatment regimes. We report a single, in-depth case study of one young adult with cancer and her use of mobile telephony and web based social networking sites in building support networks. Three important themes emerge from this case. First, in this context computer mediated communications (CMC) are not exclusive to the maintenance of online relationships, but mediate networks of “core”, “significant,” and new ties (primarily online) over time. Second, the social engagement between the subject and members of their social networks is dynamic with different modes of communication predominant at different points in time and different relationships significant at different points in time depending on state of illness, treatment and context. Finally, the interplay between CMC and different ties influence the characteristics of the networks, which is characterized by bridging and segmenting networks.

[1]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[3]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[4]  R. Ettinger,et al.  Cancer in adolescents and young adults. Psychosocial concerns, coping strategies, and interventions , 1993, Cancer.

[5]  S. Heiney,et al.  Cancer in Adolescents and Young Adults , 1993 .

[6]  G. Reaman,et al.  Cancer in adolescents and young adults , 1993, Cancer.

[7]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Network Analysis and Computer-Mediated Communication Systems , 1994 .

[8]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 1994 .

[9]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[10]  Magid Igbaria Proceedings of the 1996 ACM SIGCPR/SIGMIS Conference on Computer personnel Research, Denver, CO, USA, April 11-13, 1996 , 1996, SIGCPR.

[11]  Barry Wellman,et al.  For a social network analysis of computer networks: a sociological perspective on collaborative work and virtual community , 1996, SIGCPR '96.

[12]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) , 1997, BMJ.

[13]  T. Landauer,et al.  Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction , 1997 .

[14]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) , 1997 .

[15]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Adolescents' perspectives of chronic illness: "it's hard". , 1998, Journal of pediatric nursing.

[16]  B. Nardi,et al.  It's Not What You Know, It's Who You Know: Work in the Information Age , 2000, First Monday.

[17]  M. Castells Die Internet-Galaxie , 2001 .

[18]  B. Wellman Physical Place and Cyberplace: The Rise of Personalized Networking , 2001 .

[19]  Manuel Castells,et al.  The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society , 2001 .

[20]  J. Preece,et al.  Online communities: focusing on sociability and usability , 2002 .

[21]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[22]  P. Kollock,et al.  Communities in Cyberspace , 2002 .

[23]  W. Bleyer Cancer in older adolescents and young adults: epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, survival, and importance of clinical trials. , 2002, Medical and pediatric oncology.

[24]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[25]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Network Communities: Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed ... , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[26]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[27]  M. T. Høybye,et al.  Online interaction. Effects of storytelling in an internet breast cancer support group , 2005, Psycho-oncology.

[28]  Zbigniew Smoreda,et al.  Are social networks technologically embedded?: How networks are changing today with changes in communication technology , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[29]  D. Ashley,et al.  Adolescent and young adult cancer: a revolution in evolution? , 2006, Internal medicine journal.

[30]  A. Bleyer,et al.  Cancer epidemiology in older adolescents and young adults 15 to 29 years of age, including SEER incidence and survival: 1975-2000. , 2006 .

[31]  B. Wellman,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships: Personal Relationships: On and Off the Internet , 2006 .

[32]  Viv Wright It's hard. , 2006, Journal of perioperative practice.

[33]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Local Groups Online: Political Learning and Participation , 2006, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[34]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The network is personal: Introduction to a special issue of Social Networks , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[35]  S. Holland Remote Relationships in a Small World , 2007 .

[36]  G. Hearn,et al.  Networked Individualism of Urban Residents: Discovering the communicative ecology in inner-city apartment buildings , 2007 .

[37]  Gunnar Ellingsen,et al.  Common Information Spaces along the illness trajectories of chronic patients , 2007, ECSCW.

[38]  David Thomas,et al.  Towards social connection for young people with cancer , 2008, OZCHI '08.

[39]  N. Bowker Participating in the world (wide web): Social connections for people with disabilities. , 2008 .

[40]  Nicolas Ducheneaut,et al.  The 'Out-of-Avatar Experience': Object Focused Collaboration in Second Life , 2009, ECSCW.

[41]  Xianghua Ding,et al.  Status on Display: a Field Trial of Nomatic*Viz , 2009, ECSCW.

[42]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Asking for the Moon or Model-based Coordination in Distributed Design , 2009, ECSCW.

[43]  Clint Heyer High-Octane Work: The Oil and Gas Workplace , 2009, ECSCW.