Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method

This paper proposes a method for adaptive testing that is less complicated than the commonly used transformed up-down methods (1 up 2 down, 1 up 3 down, etc.). In addition, the weighted up-down method can converge to any desired point of the psychometric function. The rule is very simple: Each correct response leads to a decrease in signal level, each incorrect response to an increase. The only difference from the simple up-down method (1 up 1 down) is that the steps upward and the steps downward are of a different size. The straightforward construction of the novel procedure pays off in efficiency and stability: A Monte Carlo simulation reveals a definite advantage, though small, of the weighted up-down method over the 1-up-2-down rule.

[1]  C Kaernbach,et al.  A single-interval adjustment-matrix (SIAM) procedure for unbiased adaptive testing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  A. Gorea,et al.  Different encoding mechanisms for phase and contrast , 1986, Vision Research.

[4]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Adaptive staircase techniques in psychoacoustics: a comparison of human data and a mathematical model. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions , 1967 .