Growth and energetics of Leuconostoc oenos during cometabolism of glucose with citrate or fructose

The metabolic and energetic characterization of the growth of Leuconostoc oenos on glucose-citrate or glucose-fructose mixtures enables the potential role of this bacterium in the wine-making process to be ascertained. Moreover, mixotrophic conditions remain a suitable means for improving biomass productivities of malolactic starter cultures. When the malolactic bacterium L. oenos was grown in batch cultures on complex medium at pH 5.0 with glucose-citrate or glucose-fructose mixtures, enhancement of both the specific growth rate and biomass production yields was observed. While growth was possible on fructose as the sole source of energy, citrate alone did not allow subsequent biomass production. The metabolic interactions between the catabolic pathways of the glucose cosubstrates and the heterofermentation of hexoses led to an increased acetate yield as a result of modified NADH oxidation. However, the calculated global coenzyme regeneration showed that the reducing equivalent balance was never equilibrated. The stimulatory effects of these glucose cosubstrates on growth resulted from increased ATP synthesis by substrate-level phosphorylation via acetate kinase. While the energetic efficiency remained close to 10 g of biomass produced per mol of ATP, the increase in the specific growth rate and biomass production yields was directly related to the rate and yield of ATP generation.

[1]  R. Kunkee,et al.  Characterization and Energetics of Leuconostoc Oenos ml 34 , 1972 .

[2]  G. Mead,et al.  Anaerobic bacteria in habitats other than man. , 1986, Society for Applied Bacteriology symposium series.

[3]  P. Schmitt,et al.  Co-metabolism of citrate and lactose by Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. cremoris , 1991 .

[4]  T. Cogan Co‐metabolism of citrate and glucose by Leuconostoc spp.: effects on growth, substrates and products , 1987 .

[5]  M. Clayton,et al.  Characterization of Wine Lactic Acid Bacteria: Single Broth Culture for Tests of Heterofermentation, Mannitol from Fructose, and Ammonia from Arginine , 1991, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[6]  H. Santos,et al.  Pathway and regulation of erythritol formation in Leuconostoc oenos , 1993, Journal of bacteriology.

[7]  S. Pirt The maintenance energy of bacteria in growing cultures , 1965, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[8]  T. H. Lee,et al.  Practical Implications of Malolactic Fermentation: A Review , 1985, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[9]  M. Veiga-da-Cunha,et al.  Application of 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance To Elucidate the Unexpected Biosynthesis of Erythritol by Leuconostoc oenos , 1992, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[10]  Y. H. Lee,et al.  A model for energy‐sufficient culture growth , 1990, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  S. Condon,et al.  Active Role of Oxygen and NADH Oxidase in Growth and Energy Metabolism of Leuconostoc , 1986 .

[12]  W. Donachie,et al.  Growth of the Bacterial Cell , 1970, Nature.

[13]  P. Loubière,et al.  Electrogenic malate uptake and improved growth energetics of the malolactic bacterium Leuconostoc oenos grown on glucose-malate mixtures , 1992, Journal of bacteriology.

[14]  S. Sugimoto,et al.  Effects of Carbon Source Sugars on the Yield of Amino Acid Production and Sucrose Metabolism in Brevibacterium flavum , 1990 .

[15]  Jeroen Hugenholtz,et al.  Citrate Fermentation by Lactococcus and Leuconostoc spp , 1991, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[16]  T. V. Rooyen,et al.  Utilization of glucose, fructose and malic acid by malolactic bacteria: effect of ethanol and formation of mannitol and volatile acids , 1988 .