‘Sticky’ Learning: Assembling Bodies, Objects and Affects at the Museum and Beyond

This chapter contributes to current debates in school and museum education concerning the role and contribution of affect to learning. Taken to be the transmission of force or intensity across bodies, and to precede processes of cognition, affect serves to challenge currently established cognitivist, constructivist and representationalist forms of learning and knowledge in education. Guided by Deleuzian philosophy and drawing on case data collected over the course of a project investigating the potentialities of affective learning at the museum, it is argued that museum learning is ‘sticky’: it becomes attached through particular affects and has the capacity to leave a lasting impression. An outcome of encounters involving bodies, objects and affects, it brings forth new capacities for thinking, doing and being. The empirical material worked shows that bodies are a chief site of securing the circulation of affects, and that affective capacities of bodies are central to learning and can travel from one learning location (museum) to another (classroom). Importantly, these capacities can be highly political and ethical; they can activate learners’ ethical and political imaginations and induce attentiveness to otherness. Altogether, I propose that better understanding the phenomenon of learning and how it can be made to stick is a significant project in education. It affords consideration of the complex distributed agency (and pedagogic responsibility) that emerges from the breaking down of the subject-object and mind-body binaries and provides significant insights into and possibilities for a renewed practice of school and museum education.

[1]  B. Massumi Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation , 2002 .

[2]  Moira Gatens Feminism as “Password”: Re-thinking the “Possible” with Spinoza and Deleuze , 2000, Hypatia.

[3]  Michalinos Zembylas,et al.  WITNESSING IN THE CLASSROOM: THE ETHICS AND POLITICS OF AFFECT , 2006 .

[4]  E. S. St. Pierre,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis After Coding , 2014 .

[5]  Peter H. Sawchuk,et al.  Emerging Approaches to Educational Research: Tracing the Socio-Material , 2011 .

[6]  Valerie Walkerdine Using the Work of Felix Guattari to Understand Space, Place, Social Justice, and Education , 2013 .

[7]  B. Latour How to Talk About the Body? the Normative Dimension of Science Studies , 2004 .

[8]  Dianne Mulcahy,et al.  Affective assemblages: body matters in the pedagogic practices of contemporary school classrooms , 2012 .

[9]  Karin Hultman,et al.  Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: a relational materialist methodological approach to educational research , 2010 .

[10]  D. Mulcahy Body Matters: The Critical Contribution of Affect in School Classrooms and Beyond , 2015 .

[11]  Jane Bennett Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things , 2010 .

[12]  B. Latour Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[13]  Inna Semetsky Learning with Bodymind , 2013 .

[14]  Leila Dawney The motor of being: a response to Steve Pile’s ‘Emotions and affect in recent human geography’ , 2011 .

[15]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[16]  T. Roberts,et al.  From Things to Events: Whitehead and the Materiality of Process , 2014 .

[17]  M. Watkins Desiring Recognition, Accumulating Affect , 2009 .

[18]  N. Fox,et al.  The Sexuality-Assemblage: Desire, Affect, Anti-Humanism , 2013 .

[19]  G. Noble,et al.  Disposed to Learn: Schooling, Ethnicity and the Scholarly Habitus , 2013 .

[20]  J. Skattebol Affect: a tool to support pedagogical change , 2010 .

[21]  A. Witcomb Understanding the role of affect in producing a critical pedagogy for history museums , 2013 .

[22]  C. Duff Towards a developmental ethology: Exploring Deleuze’s contribution to the study of health and human development , 2010, Health.

[23]  Graham D. Burchell,et al.  What Is Philosophy , 1996 .

[24]  N. Fox,et al.  New materialist social inquiry: designs, methods and the research-assemblage , 2015 .

[25]  J. Law Actor-network theory and material semiotics , 2009 .

[26]  Ronald Bogue,et al.  Search, Swim and See: Deleuze's apprenticeship in signs and pedagogy of images , 2004 .

[27]  B. Davies Reading Anger in Early Childhood Intra-Actions , 2014 .

[28]  Gilles Deleuze,et al.  Difference and Repetition , 1968 .

[29]  Alecia Youngblood Jackson,et al.  Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research: Viewing Data Across Multiple Perspectives , 2011 .

[30]  M. Warin Material Feminism, Obesity Science and the Limits of Discursive Critique , 2015 .

[31]  A. Hickey-Moody Affect as Method: Feelings, Aesthetics and Affective Pedagogy , 2013 .

[32]  Diana H. Coole,et al.  New materialisms : ontology, agency, and politics , 2010 .

[33]  Hillevi Lenz Taguchi A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysing interview data , 2012 .

[34]  F. Guattari,et al.  A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia , 1980 .

[35]  Karen Barad Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning , 2007 .

[36]  C. Smith,et al.  Recreating place: Little Lon , 2010 .

[37]  M. Wetherell Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding , 2012 .

[38]  D. Lacapra Trauma, Absence, Loss , 1999, Critical Inquiry.

[39]  N. Lykke The Timeliness of Post-Constructionism , 2010 .

[40]  Leila Dawney The Interruption: Investigating Subjectivation and Affect , 2013 .