Downscaling patterns of complementarity to a finer resolution and its implications for conservation prioritization

Abstract Given species inventories of all sites in a planning area, integer programming or heuristic algorithms can prioritize sites in terms of the site's complementary value, that is, the ability of the site to complement (add unrepresented species to) other sites prioritized for conservation. The utility of these procedures is limited because distributions of species are typically available only as coarse atlases or range maps, whereas conservation planners need to prioritize relatively small sites. If such coarse‐resolution information can be used to identify small sites that efficiently represent species (i.e., downscaled), then such data can be useful for conservation planning. We develop and test a new type of surrogate for biodiversity, which we call downscaled complementarity. In this approach, complementarity values from large cells are downscaled to small cells, using statistical methods or simple map overlays. We illustrate our approach for birds in Spain by building models at coarse scale (50 × 50 km atlas of European birds, and global range maps of birds interpreted at the same 50 × 50 km grid size), using this model to predict complementary value for 10 × 10 km cells in Spain, and testing how well‐prioritized cells represented bird distributions in an independent bird atlas of those 10 × 10 km cells. Downscaled complementarity was about 63–77% as effective as having full knowledge of the 10‐km atlas data in its ability to improve on random selection of sites. Downscaled complementarity has relatively low data acquisition cost and meets representation goals well compared with other surrogates currently in use. Our study justifies additional tests to determine whether downscaled complementarity is an effective surrogate for other regions and taxa, and at spatial resolution finer than 10 × 10 km cells. Until such tests have been completed, we caution against assuming that any surrogate can reliably prioritize sites for species representation.

[1]  Robert J. Whittaker,et al.  Conservation Biogeography: Ladle/Conservation Biogeography , 2011 .

[2]  Ramón Martí,et al.  Atlas de las aves reproductoras de España , 2004 .

[3]  Sandro Azaele,et al.  Downscaling species occupancy from coarse spatial scales. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[4]  Liana N. Joseph,et al.  Targeting Global Protected Area Expansion for Imperiled Biodiversity , 2014, PLoS biology.

[5]  W. Hagemeijer,et al.  The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds , 1997 .

[6]  P. Clifford,et al.  Modifying the t test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes , 1993 .

[7]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Downscaling of species distribution models: a hierarchical approach , 2013 .

[8]  P. Beier,et al.  Environmental diversity as a surrogate for species representation , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[9]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[10]  H. Kaiser The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[11]  Thorsten M. Buzug,et al.  IR-04-067 Adaptive Speciation : Introduction , 2004 .

[12]  Sandro Azaele,et al.  Can coarse‐grain patterns in insect atlas data predict local occupancy? , 2014 .

[13]  P. Beier,et al.  Using abiotic variables to predict importance of sites for species representation , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[14]  Ana S. L. Rodrigues,et al.  Shortcuts for Biodiversity Conservation Planning: The Effectiveness of Surrogates , 2007 .

[15]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  A Comparison of Richness Hotspots, Rarity Hotspots, and Complementary Areas for Conserving Diversity of British Birds , 1996 .

[16]  B. Benito,et al.  The impact of modelling choices in the predictive performance of richness maps derived from species‐distribution models: guidelines to build better diversity models , 2013 .

[17]  Robert G. Haight,et al.  Integer programming methods for reserve selection and design , 2009 .

[18]  P. Beier,et al.  Global patterns and environmental correlates of high‐priority conservation areas for vertebrates , 2015 .

[19]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[20]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[21]  Manuela M. P. Huso,et al.  A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon , 1997 .

[22]  Jonathan S. Adams,et al.  Precious heritage : the status of biodiversity in the United States , 2000 .

[23]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Zonation: Spatial conservation planning framework and software version 3.0 user manual , 2011 .

[24]  Antonio Trabucco,et al.  Climate change mitigation: a spatial analysis of global land suitability for Clean Development Mechanism afforestation and reforestation , 2008 .

[25]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Downscaling European species atlas distributions to a finer resolution: implications for conservation planning , 2005 .

[26]  Ethan P. White,et al.  Disparity between range map- and survey-based analyses of species richness: patterns, processes and implications , 2005 .

[27]  Paul Beier,et al.  Rarity-Weighted Richness: A Simple and Reliable Alternative to Integer Programming and Heuristic Algorithms for Minimum Set and Maximum Coverage Problems in Conservation Planning , 2015, PloS one.

[28]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  A mathematical classification of conservation prioritization problems , 2009 .

[29]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Marxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritization , 2009 .

[30]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Species richness, hotspots, and the scale dependence of range maps in ecology and conservation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  D. P. Faith,et al.  Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas , 1996, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[32]  A. Tsoar,et al.  Predicting Regional Patterns of Similarity in Species Composition for Conservation Planning , 2005 .

[33]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .