A novel strategy of transcription regulation by intragenic nucleosome ordering.

Numerous studies of chromatin structure showed that nucleosome free regions (NFRs) located at 5' gene ends contribute to transcription initiation regulation. Here, we determine the role of intragenic chromatin structure on gene expression regulation. We show that, along Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes, nucleosomes are highly organized following two types of architecture that depend only on the distance between the NFRs located at the 5' and 3' gene ends. In the first type, this distance constrains in vivo the positioning of n nucleosomes regularly organized in a "crystal-like" array. In the second type, this distance is such that the corresponding genes can accommodate either n or (n + 1) nucleosomes, thereby displaying two possible crystal-like arrays of n weakly compacted or n + 1 highly compacted nucleosomes. This adaptability confers "bi-stable" properties to chromatin and is a key to its dynamics. Compared to crystal-like genes, bi-stable genes present higher transcriptional plasticity, higher sensitivity to chromatin regulators, higher H3 turnover rate, and lower H2A.Z enrichment. The results strongly suggest that transcription elongation is facilitated by higher chromatin compaction. The data allow us to propose a new paradigm of transcriptional control mediated by the stability and the level of compaction of the intragenic chromatin architecture and open new ways for investigating eukaryotic gene expression regulation.

[1]  B. Cairns,et al.  Genome-Wide Dynamics of Htz1, a Histone H2A Variant that Poises Repressed/Basal Promoters for Activation through Histone Loss , 2005, Cell.

[2]  R. Morse.  Transcription factor access to promoter elements , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[3]  J. Lieb,et al.  Evidence for nucleosome depletion at active regulatory regions genome-wide , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Yaniv Lubling,et al.  Distinct Modes of Regulation by Chromatin Encoded through Nucleosome Positioning Signals , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  A. Lesne,et al.  Chromatin fiber functional organization: Some plausible models , 2006, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[6]  Jerome Percus,et al.  Equilibrium state of a classical fluid of hard rods in an external field , 1976 .

[7]  Jun S. Song,et al.  High-throughput mapping of the chromatin structure of human promoters , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Bryan J Venters,et al.  A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. , 2008, Genome research.

[9]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Global nucleosome occupancy in yeast , 2004, Genome Biology.

[10]  I. Albert,et al.  Translational and rotational settings of H2A.Z nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2007, Nature.

[11]  Bryan J Venters,et al.  How eukaryotic genes are transcribed , 2009, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[12]  A. Kornblihtt.  Chromatin, transcript elongation and alternative splicing , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[13]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Chromatin decouples promoter threshold from dynamic range , 2008, Nature.

[14]  Ron Shamir,et al.  A genome-wide analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae demonstrates the influence of chromatin modifiers on transcription , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[15]  C. Lavelle,et al.  Chromatin Polymorphism and the Nucleosome Superfamily: A Genealogy , 2007, Cell cycle.

[16]  L. Stryer,et al.  Statistical distributions of nucleosomes: nonrandom locations by a stochastic mechanism. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  Christopher L. Warren,et al.  Genome-wide distribution of yeast RNA polymerase II and its control by Sen1 helicase. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[18]  Guo-Cheng Yuan,et al.  Genomic Sequence Is Highly Predictive of Local Nucleosome Depletion , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  J. Widom,et al.  Nucleosome packaging and nucleosome positioning of genomic DNA. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  N. Barkai,et al.  Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes. , 2008, Genome research.

[21]  Bing Li,et al.  The Role of Chromatin during Transcription , 2007, Cell.

[22]  Roger D. Kornberg,et al.  Nucleosome Retention and the Stochastic Nature of Promoter Chromatin Remodeling for Transcription , 2008, Cell.

[23]  C. Muchardt,et al.  Splicing, transcription, and chromatin: a ménage à trois. , 2008, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[24]  Vincent Miele,et al.  DNA physical properties determine nucleosome occupancy from yeast to fly , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  B. Suter,et al.  Poly(dA.dT) sequences exist as rigid DNA structures in nucleosome-free yeast promoters in vivo. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  Davis,et al.  Solution of Percus's equation for the density of hard rods in an external field. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[27]  Kami Ahmad,et al.  Rules and regulation in the primary structure of chromatin. , 2007, Current opinion in cell biology.

[28]  Karolin Luger,et al.  Nucleosome core particles containing a poly(dA.dT) sequence element exhibit a locally distorted DNA structure. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Oliver J. Rando,et al.  Chromatin remodelling at promoters suppresses antisense transcription , 2007, Nature.

[30]  E. Segal,et al.  What controls nucleosome positions? , 2009, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[31]  V. Iyer,et al.  Poly(dA:dT), a ubiquitous promoter element that stimulates transcription via its intrinsic DNA structure. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[32]  G. Hartzog,et al.  Transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II. , 2003, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[33]  L. Mouawad,et al.  Nucleosome chiral transition under positive torsional stress in single chromatin fibers. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[34]  Steven M. Johnson,et al.  A high-resolution, nucleosome position map of C. elegans reveals a lack of universal sequence-dictated positioning. , 2008, Genome research.

[35]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[36]  S. Véronneau,et al.  Deletion of Many Yeast Introns Reveals a Minority of Genes That Require Splicing for Function Strains and Plasmids Direct Introns Displacement Strategy Growth Assays Fitness Test , 2022 .

[37]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Genome-Scale Identification of Nucleosome Positions in S. cerevisiae , 2005, Science.

[38]  I. Albert,et al.  Nucleosome positions predicted through comparative genomics , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[39]  O. Rando,et al.  Nucleosome positioning: how is it established, and why does it matter? , 2010, Developmental biology.

[40]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Nucleosome positioning signals in genomic DNA. , 2007, Genome research.

[41]  K. Struhl,et al.  Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[42]  A. Arneodo,et al.  Experiments confirm the influence of genome long-range correlations on nucleosome positioning. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[43]  Wolfgang Huber,et al.  A high-resolution map of transcription in the yeast genome. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Dynamic Remodeling of Individual Nucleosomes Across a Eukaryotic Genome in Response to Transcriptional Perturbation , 2007, PLoS biology.

[45]  R. Kornberg,et al.  Twenty-Five Years of the Nucleosome, Fundamental Particle of the Eukaryote Chromosome , 1999, Cell.

[46]  Irene K. Moore,et al.  The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome , 2009, Nature.

[47]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Dynamics of Replication-Independent Histone Turnover in Budding Yeast , 2007, Science.