Performance and prospects of payments for ecosystem services programs: evidence from China.

Systematic evaluation of the environmental and socioeconomic effects of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) programs is crucial for guiding policy design and implementation. We evaluated the performance of the Natural Forest Conservation Program (NFCP), a national PES program of China, in the Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas. The environmental effects of the NFCP were evaluated through a historical trend (1965-2001) analysis of forest cover to estimate a counter-factual (i.e., without-PES) forest cover baseline for 2007. The socioeconomic effects of the NFCP were evaluated using data collected through household interviews carried out before and after NFCP implementation in 2001. Our results suggest that the NFCP was not only significantly associated with increases in forest cover, but also had both positive (e.g., labor reduction for fuelwood collection) and negative (e.g., economic losses due to crop raiding by wildlife) effects on local households. Results from this study emphasize the importance of integrating local conditions and understanding underlying mechanisms to enhance the performance of PES programs. Our findings are useful for the design and implementation of successful conservation policies not only in our study area but also in similar places around the world.

[1]  Zhiyun Ouyang,et al.  Protecting China's Biodiversity , 2003, Science.

[2]  Li An,et al.  Temporal changes in giant panda habitat connectivity across boundaries of Wolong Nature Reserve, China. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[3]  Li An,et al.  Negotiation Analysis: An Introduction , 2002 .

[4]  Li Zhang,et al.  An initial study on habitat conservation of Asian elephant (Elephas maximus), with a focus on human elephant conflict in Simao, China , 2003 .

[5]  A. Viña,et al.  Improving the efficiency of conservation policies with the use of surrogates derived from remotely sensed and ancillary data , 2013 .

[6]  M. Kalacska,et al.  Baseline assessment for environmental services payments from satellite imagery: a case study from Costa Rica and Mexico. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  J. Swenson,et al.  Reference scenarios for deforestation and forest degradation in support of REDD: a review of data and methods , 2008 .

[8]  S. Wunder.  The Efficiency of Payments for Environmental Services in Tropical Conservation , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[9]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Going beyond panaceas , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Sven Wunder,et al.  Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: A tool for boosting conservation benefits , 2008 .

[11]  Yan Zeng,et al.  Factors affecting crop damage by wild boar and methods of mitigation in a giant panda reserve , 2008, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[12]  S. Rozelle,et al.  Conservation Payments, Liquidity Constraints, and Off‐Farm Labor: Impact of the Grain‐For‐Green Program on Rural Households in China , 2008 .

[13]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  A. Viña,et al.  Evaluating MODIS data for mapping wildlife habitat distribution , 2008 .

[15]  Craig W. Thomas,et al.  Evaluating the environmental impact of payments for ecosystem services in Coatepec (Mexico) using remote sensing and on-site interviews , 2011, Environmental Conservation.

[16]  J. Liu,et al.  Ecological Degradation in Protected Areas: The Case of Wolong Nature Reserve for Giant Pandas , 2001, Science.

[17]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Factors affecting land reconversion plans following a payment for ecosystem service program , 2009 .

[18]  S. Herrero.  The Giant Pandas of Wolong, George B. Schaller, Hu Jinchu, Pan Wenshi, Zhu Jing. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1985), xix, +298. Price $25.00 , 1986 .

[19]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Encyclopedia of Biodiversity , 2000 .

[20]  A. Viña,et al.  Effects of Natural Disasters on Conservation Policies: The Case of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake, China , 2011, AMBIO.

[21]  E. Ostrom.  A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems , 2009, Science.

[22]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Changes in Human Population Structure: Implications for Biodiversity Conservation , 1999 .

[23]  S. Wunder.  Payments for environmental services : Some nuts and bolts , 2022 .

[24]  R. Yin,et al.  An integrated assessment of China's ecological restoration programs , 2009 .

[25]  A. Janvry,et al.  The role of deforestation risk and calibrated compensation in designing payments for environmental services , 2008, Environment and Development Economics.

[26]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[27]  G. Sánchez‐Azofeifa,et al.  Costa Rica's Payment for Environmental Services Program: Intention, Implementation, and Impact , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[28]  A. Coral,et al.  Lessons learned for REDD+ from PES and conservation incentive programs : examples from Costa Rica, Mexico, and Ecuador , 2012 .

[29]  John R. Jensen,et al.  Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective , 1986 .

[30]  S. Rozelle,et al.  Grain for Green: Cost-Effectiveness and Sustainability of China’s Conservation Set-Aside Program , 2005, Land Economics.

[31]  A. Daniels,et al.  Understanding the impacts of Costa Rica's PES: Are we asking the right questions? , 2010 .

[32]  G. Daily,et al.  Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity , 2003, Nature.

[33]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Nonlinear effects of group size on collective action and resource outcomes , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  S. Bajpai,et al.  Cretaceous extinctions: evidence overlooked. , 2010, Science.

[35]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Evaluate Participation in Costa Rica's Program of Payments for Environmental Services , 2009 .

[36]  K. Frank,et al.  Drivers and Socioeconomic Impacts of Tourism Participation in Protected Areas , 2012, PloS one.

[37]  Ying Ge,et al.  Ecosystem service value assessment for constructed wetlands: A case study in Hangzhou, China , 2008 .

[38]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Distribution of Economic Benefits from Ecotourism: A Case Study of Wolong Nature Reserve for Giant Pandas in China , 2008, Environmental management.

[39]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  China's Road to Sustainability , 2010, Science.

[40]  Xiaodong Chen,et al.  Going Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: An Index System of Human Well-Being , 2013, PloS one.

[41]  Li An,et al.  Simulating demographic and socioeconomic processes on household level and implications for giant panda habitats , 2001 .

[42]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources , 1994 .

[43]  Wu Yang,et al.  Evaluation of Ecosystem Service Policies from Biophysical and Social Perspectives: The Case of China , 2013 .

[44]  J. Diamond,et al.  China's environment in a globalizing world , 2005, Nature.

[45]  Fonafifo,et al.  Lessons Learned for REDD+ from PES and Conservation Incentive Programs , 2012 .

[46]  William W. Taylor,et al.  A Framework for Evaluating the Effects of Human Factors on Wildlife Habitat: the Case of Giant Pandas , 1999 .

[47]  Sven Wunder,et al.  Decentralized payments for environmental services: The cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador , 2008 .

[48]  Wei Liu,et al.  Going Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: An Index System of Human Dependence on Ecosystem Services , 2013, PloS one.

[49]  Adrian Martin,et al.  Payments for ecosystem services in an African protected area: exploring issues of legitimacy, fairness, equity and effectiveness , 2012, Oryx.

[50]  G. Brady.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[51]  Li An,et al.  Agent-based modeling of the effects of social norms on enrollment in payments for ecosystem services. , 2012, Ecological modelling.

[52]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Forest commons and local enforcement , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. , 1999, Science.

[54]  Katharine R. E. Sims,et al.  Designing payments for ecosystem services: Lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Adolescents Leaving Parental Home: Psychosocial Correlates and Implications for Conservation , 2003 .

[56]  A. Viña,et al.  Using Cost‐Effective Targeting to Enhance the Efficiency of Conservation Investments in Payments for Ecosystem Services , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[57]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Effects of fuelwood collection and timber harvesting on giant panda habitat use , 2008 .