On a sorting rule to improve computational efficiency of connection admission control algorithms for ATM networks

It is well known that the cell loss probability suffered by different connections offered to the same ATM network link is, in general, different. Therefore, most of the connection admission control (CAC) schemes proposed for ATM networks have a computational complexity depending on the number of connections offered to a link. We propose to reduce this complexity by adopting a sorting rule among connections. In particular, we compare the expected cell loss probability of a pair of different traffic sources, when they are offered to a bufferless network node along with an arbitrary background traffic. We find a necessary and sufficient condition on the source parameters which, when satisfied, guarantees that the cell loss suffered by one source always bounds the one suffered by the other, for any distribution of the background traffic. This condition defines a partial sorting on the set of traffic sources offered to a node, according to which a small set of 'bounding' connections can be defined. The CAC scheme may be then implemented to monitor only the connections belonging to this set. We show that, assuming random traffic parameters, the resulting computational complexity of the CAC scheme depends only on the logarithm of the number of connections offered to each network link.

[1]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[2]  Andreas D. Bovopoulos,et al.  Real-time admission control algorithms with delay and loss guarantees in ATM networks , 1994, Proceedings of INFOCOM '94 Conference on Computer Communications.

[3]  H. Esaki Call admission control method in ATM networks , 1992, [Conference Record] SUPERCOMM/ICC '92 Discovering a New World of Communications.

[4]  Moshe Zukerman,et al.  Connection admission control in ATM networks , 1994, 1994 IEEE GLOBECOM. Communications: The Global Bridge.

[5]  Giuseppe Bianchi,et al.  Simple bandwidth management scheme for multiservice ATM networks , 1994, 1994 IEEE GLOBECOM. Communications: The Global Bridge.

[6]  David M. Lucantoni,et al.  Meeting the challenge: congestion and flow control strategies for broadband information transport , 1989, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 1989, and Exhibition. 'Communications Technology for the 1990s and Beyond.

[7]  J. Sole-Pareta,et al.  Bandwidth allocation based on real time calculations using the convolution approach , 1994, 1994 IEEE GLOBECOM. Communications: The Global Bridge.

[8]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[9]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[10]  J.S. Turner,et al.  Managing bandwidth in ATM networks with bursty traffic , 1992, IEEE Network.

[11]  Andreas D. Bovopoulos,et al.  Design of real-time admission control algorithms with priority support , 1995, Proceedings of INFOCOM'95.

[12]  Jonathan S. Turner Bandwidth Management in ATM Networks Using Fast Buffer Reservation , 1994 .

[13]  Giuseppe Bianchi,et al.  A simple bandwidth management scheme for multiservice ATM networks , 1994 .

[14]  Peter Key,et al.  Connection Admission Control in ATM networks , 1995 .

[15]  Yasuhiro Miyao,et al.  A call admission control scheme in ATM networks , 1991, ICC 91 International Conference on Communications Conference Record.