Computer-mediated communication and social networking tools at work

Purpose – Advances in information technology (IT) have resulted in the development of various computer‐mediated communication (CMC) and social networking tools. However, quantifying the benefits of utilizing these tools in the organizational context remains a challenge. In this study, the authors aim to investigate the effects of three specific tools, viz. instant messenger, email and knowledge forum, on facilitating the communication and social network at work, and their subsequent influence on individuals’ work performance. Together with a social network diagram, the proposed model is validated by a survey of 59 employees of a company which embeds these three CMC and social networking tools in the work process. The key findings, implications and future research are discussed. Design/methodology/approach – The authors verify the research model with data from the Hong Kong office of an international bank headquartered in London, UK. They also collected the data on the social networks of 59 employees to draw a network diagram of the respondents using the social network analysis software UCINET. Findings – The research model is fully supported by the survey data. Meanwhile, the social networks analysis also suggests the linkage of using IM at work and the high level of degree and high level of closeness. Originality/value – This study provided an empirical verification of media performance theories, evidenced by interactive tools such as IM and email. This research also directly linked the elements of social network, viz. degree, closeness and betweenness, with the CMC and social network tools, the communication, interactivity, relationship, and work performance.

[1]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Interactive or interruptive? Instant messaging at work , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  Nassim Belbaly,et al.  Corporate Portal: A Tool for Knowledge Management Synchronization , 2004, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[3]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  Understanding Individual Adoption of Instant Messaging: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Sven C. Voelpel,et al.  Managing knowledge sharing in China: the case of Siemens ShareNet , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[5]  Allen S. Lee Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation , 1994, MIS Q..

[6]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[7]  Paul Benjamin Lowry,et al.  The CMC Interactivity Model: How Interactivity Enhances Communication Quality and Process Satisfaction in Lean-Media Groups , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Yi Liang,et al.  Empowering employees through instant messaging , 2010, Inf. Technol. People.

[9]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity , 2008, MIS Q..

[10]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Technology: The New Media in Society , 1986 .

[11]  Tanja A. Börzel,et al.  Organizing Babylon ‐ On the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks , 1998 .

[12]  M. Shadur,et al.  The relationship among work-related perceptions, employee attitudes, and employee performance: The integral role of communications , 1998 .

[13]  Jakki J. Mohr,et al.  Communication Flows in Distribution Channels: Impact on Assessments of Communication Quality and Satisfaction , 1995 .

[14]  Yifeng Hu,et al.  Friendships through IM: Examining the Relationship between Instant Messaging and Intimacy , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[15]  S. D. Berkowitz,et al.  Social Structures: A Network Approach , 1989 .

[16]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action , 2000, CSCW '00.

[17]  Jane Webster,et al.  Unintended consequences of emerging communication technologies: Instant Messaging in the workplace , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Matthias Trier,et al.  The Use of Instant Messaging in Working Relationship Development: A Case Study , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[19]  Yuping Liu,et al.  Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.

[20]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[22]  John Scott Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[23]  P. Buckley,et al.  Cultural Awareness in Knowledge Transfer to China — The Role of Guanxi and Mianzi , 2006 .

[24]  M. Markus Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[25]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Instant Messaging for Collaboration: A Case Study of a High-Tech Firm , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[26]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[27]  Donald L. Amoroso,et al.  Testing a Causal Model of End-User Application Effectiveness , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  An empirical study of the effects of interactivity on web user attitude , 2003 .

[29]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[30]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[31]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[32]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[33]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.