Chapter 11 – Production of Wine Starter Cultures

Publisher Summary The effectiveness of starter cultures in the wine industry is based largely on the microbiological control that can be achieved during winemaking. Good manufacturing practices favor the development of the inoculated microorganisms and reduce the microbial competition that they encounter, given that both musts and wine are non-sterile substrates. The implementation of quality-control systems for hygiene such as the hazard analysis critical control point approach is by far the best guarantee of success when using starter cultures in the wine industry. The use of starter cultures may not meet expectations if the goals are not first understood in terms of measurable characteristics. Consequently, the first step in any wine production process is to clearly define the type of wine to be produced. This step is more important than usually considered since it guides both the preparation and choice of the starter culture.

[1]  G. C. Johnston,et al.  Stationary phase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1993 .

[2]  N. Desroche,et al.  A new approach for selection of Oenococcus oeni strains in order to produce malolactic starters. , 2005, International journal of food microbiology.

[3]  S. W. King,et al.  Metabolic Interactions BetweenSaccharomyces cerevisiaeandLeuconostoc oenosin a Model Grape Juice/Wine System , 1986, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[4]  W. A. Scheffers,et al.  Enzymic analysis of the crabtree effect in glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1989, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[5]  A. Delgado,et al.  In Situ Determination of the Intracellular pH of Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus plantarum during Pressure Treatment , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[6]  C. Delfini,et al.  Metabolic and technological factors affecting acetic acid production by yeasts during alcoholic fermentation , 1991 .

[7]  P. Henschke,et al.  Interaction of pH, ethanol concentration and wine matrix on induction of malolactic fermentation with commercial ‘direct inoculation’ starter cultures , 2003 .

[8]  R. Linforth,et al.  The oxidative stress response of a lager brewing yeast strain during industrial propagation and fermentation. , 2008, FEMS yeast research.

[9]  Amparo Querol,et al.  Molecular characterization of a chromosomal rearrangement involved in the adaptive evolution of yeast strains. , 2002, Genome research.

[10]  J. Guillamón,et al.  Changes in wine yeast storage carbohydrate levels during preadaptation, rehydration and low temperature fermentations. , 2003, International journal of food microbiology.

[11]  Sergi Maicas,et al.  Production of Oenococcus oeni biomass to induce malolactic fermentation in wine by control of pH and substrate addition , 1999, Biotechnology Letters.

[12]  J. François,et al.  Reserve carbohydrates metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2001, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[13]  Natacha Le Moan,et al.  The system biology of thiol redox system in Escherichia coli and yeast: Differential functions in oxidative stress, iron metabolism and DNA synthesis , 2007, FEBS letters.

[14]  Tracy Nevitt,et al.  Yeast activator proteins and stress response: an overview , 2004, FEBS letters.

[15]  C. Champagne,et al.  Production of Leuconostoc oenos Biomass under pH Control , 1989, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[16]  S. Maicas,et al.  The effects of freezing and freeze-drying of Oenococcus oeni upon induction of malolactic fermentation in red wine , 2000 .

[17]  A. S. Carvalho,et al.  Survival of freeze-dried Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus rhamnosus during storage in the presence of protectants , 2002, Biotechnology Letters.

[18]  M. Olmo,et al.  Analysis of the expression of some stress induced genes in several commercial wine yeast strains at the beginning of vinification , 2005, Journal of applied microbiology.

[19]  T. Rossignol,et al.  Analysis of the genomic response of a wine yeast to rehydration and inoculation , 2006, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[20]  A. Querol,et al.  Analysis of the stress resistance of commercial wine yeast strains , 2001, Archives of Microbiology.

[21]  M. Jobin,et al.  Expression of the Oenococcus oeni trxA gene is induced by hydrogen peroxide and heat shock. , 1999, Microbiology.

[22]  F. Gardini,et al.  Effects of pH, Temperature, Ethanol, and Malate Concentration onLactobacillus plantarumandLeuconostoc oenos:Modelling of the Malolactic Activity , 1995, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[23]  Naren Ramakrishnan,et al.  Transcriptional Response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Desiccation and Rehydration , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[24]  J. Pronk,et al.  Pyruvate Metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1996, Yeast.

[25]  L. Bisson,et al.  MET17 and Hydrogen Sulfide Formation inSaccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[26]  Toshio Mori,et al.  Cloning of a gene suppressing hydrogen sulfide production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its expression in a brewing yeast , 1992 .

[27]  J. Guillamón,et al.  Vitality enhancement of the rehydrated active dry wine yeast. , 2008, International journal of food microbiology.

[28]  J. Gil,et al.  Improvement of volatile composition of wines by controlled addition of malolactic bacteria , 1999 .

[29]  A. Costantini,et al.  Application of real-time RT-PCR to study gene expression in active dry yeast (ADY) during the rehydration phase. , 2009, International journal of food microbiology.

[30]  K. Takahashi,et al.  Genetic engineering of a sake yeast producing no urea by successive disruption of arginase gene , 1991, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[31]  M. Jobin,et al.  The Oenococcus oeni clpX Homologue Is a Heat Shock Gene Preferentially Expressed in Exponential Growth Phase , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[32]  S Nagai,et al.  Fed batch culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A perspective of computer control to enhance the productivity in baker's yeast cultivation , 1976, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[33]  G. Suzzi,et al.  Sulfur dioxide and wine microorganisms , 1993 .

[34]  Guoqun Zhao,et al.  Influences of protectants, rehydration media and storage on the viability of freeze-dried Oenococcus oeni for malolactic fermentation , 2009 .

[35]  Dagmar Ringe,et al.  “Sleeping Beauty”: Quiescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[36]  A. Zuzuarregui,et al.  Analyses of stress resistance under laboratory conditions constitute a suitable criterion for wine yeast selection , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[37]  C. Torres,et al.  High tolerance of wild Lactobacillus plantarum and Oenococcus oeni strains to lyophilisation and stress environmental conditions of acid pH and ethanol. , 2004, FEMS microbiology letters.

[38]  M. Jobin,et al.  A small heat shock protein from Leuconostoc oenos induced by multiple stresses and during stationary growth phase , 1997, Letters in applied microbiology.

[39]  H. Buckenhüskes Selection criteria for lactic acid bacteria to be used as starter cultures for various food commodities , 1993 .

[40]  W. P. Hammes,et al.  Bacterial starter cultures in food production , 1990 .

[41]  M. Gerloni,et al.  Yeast killer systems , 1997, Clinical microbiology reviews.

[42]  J. Pérez-Ortín,et al.  An inverse correlation between stress resistance and stuck fermentations in wine yeasts. A molecular study. , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[43]  Yves Roméo,et al.  La réponse au stress osmotique des bactéries lactiques lactococcus lactis et Lactobacillus plantarum (mini-revue) , 2001 .

[44]  S. Lindquist The heat-shock response. , 1986, Annual review of biochemistry.

[45]  M. Díaz,et al.  Taking advantage of the flow cytometry technique for improving malolactic starters production , 2009 .

[46]  J. Crowe,et al.  Trehalose lowers membrane phase transitions in dry yeast cells. , 1994, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[47]  I. Altosaar,et al.  Pilot scale production and preservation of a new malolactic culture Leuconostoc oenos 44.40 For use in secondary wine fermentation , 1982, Biotechnology Letters.

[48]  C. Larsson,et al.  Fermentative capacity of dry active wine yeast requires a specific oxidative stress response during industrial biomass growth , 2009, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[49]  J. François,et al.  Early transcriptional response of wine yeast after rehydration: osmotic shock and metabolic activation. , 2007, FEMS yeast research.

[50]  J. Sablayrolles,et al.  Nitrogen demand of different yeast strains during alcoholic fermentation. Importance of the stationary phase , 1998 .

[51]  M. Wise,et al.  The continuing conundrum of the LEA proteins , 2007, Naturwissenschaften.

[52]  A. S. Carvalho,et al.  Effect of various growth media upon survival during storage of freeze‐dried Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus durans , 2003, Journal of applied microbiology.

[53]  M. Hayakawa,et al.  Distribution of the sulfite resistance gene SSU1-R and the variation in its promoter region in wine yeasts. , 2004, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[54]  S. H. Lillie,et al.  Reserve carbohydrate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: responses to nutrient limitation , 1980, Journal of bacteriology.

[55]  Maarten van de Guchte,et al.  Stress responses in lactic acid bacteria , 2002 .

[56]  Wyeth W Wasserman,et al.  Dynamics of the yeast transcriptome during wine fermentation reveals a novel fermentation stress response. , 2008, FEMS yeast research.

[57]  M. Jebbar,et al.  Potential osmoprotectants for the lactic acid bacteria Pediococcus pentosaceus and Tetragenococcus halophila. , 2003, International journal of food microbiology.

[58]  C L Cooney,et al.  Computer‐aided material balancing for prediction of fermentation parameters , 1977, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[59]  A. Lonvaud,et al.  Metabolic Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Minimize the Production of Ethyl Carbamate in Wine , 2006, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[60]  Guoqun Zhao,et al.  Influence of freeze-drying conditions on survival of Oenococcus oeni for malolactic fermentation. , 2009, International journal of food microbiology.

[61]  M. Jobin,et al.  Regulation of stress response in Oenococcus oeni as a function of environmental changes and growth phase. , 2000, International journal of food microbiology.

[62]  G. Fleet,et al.  Occurrence and Growth of Killer Yeasts during Wine Fermentation , 1987, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[63]  M. Jobin,et al.  Molecular characterization of the gene encoding an 18-kilodalton small heat shock protein associated with the membrane of Leuconostoc oenos , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[64]  A. Arnaud,et al.  Optimization of the conditions for preparing bacterial cultures for malolactic bioconversion , 1989 .

[65]  Henry Y. Wang,et al.  Computer‐aided baker's yeast fermentations , 1977, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[66]  J. Bourdineaud,et al.  The ftsH Gene of the Wine Bacterium Oenococcus oeni Is Involved in Protection against Environmental Stress , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[67]  A. Zuzuarregui,et al.  Expression of stress response genes in wine strains with different fermentative behavior. , 2004, FEMS yeast research.

[68]  A. Tunnacliffe,et al.  Intracellular trehalose is neither necessary nor sufficient for desiccation tolerance in yeast. , 2006, FEMS yeast research.

[69]  J. Thevelein Regulation of trehalose mobilization in fungi. , 1984, Microbiological reviews.

[70]  E. Craig,et al.  The Heat Shock Respons , 1985 .

[71]  A. Bos,et al.  Modelling the effect of sublethal injury on the distribution of the lag times of individual cells of Lactobacillus plantarum. , 2002, International journal of food microbiology.

[72]  M. Sola-Penna,et al.  Protection against thermal denaturation by trehalose on the plasma membrane H+-ATPase from yeast. Synergetic effect between trehalose and phospholipid environment. , 1999, European journal of biochemistry.

[73]  M. Snyder,et al.  Glucose induces cAMP-independent growth-related changes in stationary-phase cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  A. Lonvaud-Funel,et al.  Malolactic Fermentation in Wine by Direct Inoculation with Freeze-Dried Leuconostoc oenos Cultures , 1996, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.