Making Engineering StudentsMaking Women: The Discursive Context of Engineering Education

Using a contemporary feminist framework, professional engineering education is located in the intersection of three discoursesÐthe scientific discourse, the managerial discourse and the liberal education discourse. Within each of these discourses, ways of understanding engineering are articulated. This articulation occurs through practices, values, pedagogy and available knowledge(s) of engineering education. Centred in these discourses are particular normalised ways of understanding the engineerÐthese are the engineering identities of the scientist, servant and citizen. These are successful identities available to women (albeit with some restrictions). A number of practices, contexts and interactions, which create identities for women `outside' engineeringÐthe almost guys, helpmate and power-puff girlsÐare also identified. While advocacy can `learn' from both the strategic compliance, at times, and the relative ease of some women's `fit' into `normal' engineering identities, in the women's experiences there remains a prevalent theme of `not belonging' in the engineering community `as of right'. It is argued that for full and effective participation in the engineering community we need to begin to explore how this asymmetrical relationship between men and women continues to be reiterated through the context of engineering education, particularly in engineering knowledge(s). In view of this, feminist advocacy needs to forge new partnerships with men in engineering, to ensure together that they achieve their intended goal of equity and equality for women in engineering.

[1]  Sue Dockett,et al.  Australian association for research in education , 1989 .

[2]  J. Scott,et al.  Deconstructing Equality-Versus-Difference : or, The Uses of Poststructuralist Theory for Feminism , 1988 .

[3]  Flis Henwood,et al.  Engineering Difference: Discourses on gender, sexuality and work in a college of technology , 1998 .

[4]  Jane Copeland,et al.  Working with Men to Change the Culture of Engineering Education , 1998 .

[5]  Kathleen Lennon,et al.  The Man of Reason , 1985 .

[6]  Donna Harawy Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective , 2022, Philosophical Literary Journal Logos.

[7]  D. Haraway Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature , 1990 .

[8]  Sue Lewis,et al.  Masculinity and the culture of engineering , 1997 .

[9]  Jean Lave,et al.  Situating learning in communities of practice , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[10]  B. Davies,et al.  The Discursive Production of the Male/Female Dualism in School Settings , 1989 .

[11]  Paul T. Durbin Broad and narrow interpretations of philosophy of technology , 1990 .

[12]  Karen L. Tonso,et al.  ENGINEERING GENDER−GENDERING ENGINEERING: A CULTURAL MODEL FOR BELONGING , 1999 .

[13]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Critical Mass and Pedagogic Continuity: studies in academic habitus , 1997 .

[14]  Alison M. Lee,et al.  The dilemma of obedience: A feminist perspective on the making of engineers , 1996 .

[15]  L. Grant,et al.  Women in Engineering: Gender, Power, and Work Place Culture. , 1993 .

[16]  Alison Lee,et al.  Engineering as Captive Discourse , 1996 .

[17]  N. Brickhouse,et al.  What Kind of a Girl Does Science? The Construction of School Science Identities , 2000 .

[18]  Ronald Barnett,et al.  Linking Teaching and Research: A Critical Inquiry. , 1992 .

[19]  K. Tonso The Impact of Cultural Norms on Women , 1996 .

[20]  F. Haug,et al.  Female Sexualization : A Collective Work of Memory , 1987 .

[21]  Michel Pêcheux,et al.  Language, semantics and ideology : stating the obvious , 1982 .